'Being' Versus 'Doing' Punk: On Achieving Authenticity as a Member

In this paper we examine some ways in which members of subcultures make comparisons between and within subcultural groups and one function served by such comparisons. Specifically, we illustrate how social comparisons are used to achieve authenticity for the subcultural group and for the self as a member of that group. Our analysis focuses on the language through which such comparisons are made in people's talk. The data come from a series of informal interviews with punks, gothics and hippies. We analyse three types of comparison: the comparison of one or more groups with an external standard; the comparison of the subculture's past and present character; and the comparison between older and newer members. The implications of our findings for social identity theory are considered. Finally, we discuss an interesting and recurrent device for emphasising authenticity which lay in the construction of the descriptions of members' motivations for joining. This was related to the distinction between 'being' a member, or having the correct grounds for affiliation, and merely 'doing' or performing, aspects of the subculture.

[1]  Michael Brake,et al.  Comparative Youth Culture: The Sociology of Youth Cultures and Youth Subcultures in America, Britain and Canada , 1985 .

[2]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[3]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[4]  H. Tajfel Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[5]  M. Wowk,et al.  Blame allocation, sex and gender in a murder interrogation , 1984 .

[6]  K. Yardley,et al.  Self and identity : psychosocial perspectives , 1987 .

[7]  Jeffrey Alexander,et al.  The Micro-macro link , 1987 .

[8]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour , 1975 .

[9]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[10]  Peter Bull,et al.  Conversation : an interdisciplinary perspective , 1989 .

[11]  D. Canter,et al.  The Research interview, uses and approaches , 1986 .

[12]  D. Smith `K is Mentally Ill' the Anatomy of a Factual Account , 1978 .

[13]  Anita M. Pomerantz Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims , 1986, Asking and Telling in Conversation.

[14]  H. Tajfel Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[15]  D. R. Watson,et al.  Interviews and the interactional construction of accounts of homosexual identity , 1982 .

[16]  A. Mummendey,et al.  ‘Different‘ just means ‘better’: Some obvious and some hidden pathways to in‐group favouritism , 1984 .

[17]  J. Potter,et al.  Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1987 .

[18]  M. Bornewasser,et al.  Individual, social group and intergroup behaviour. Some conceptual remarks on the social identity theory , 1987 .

[19]  K. Gergen,et al.  Texts of Identity , 1989 .

[20]  B. Simon,et al.  Better or different? III. The impact of importance of comparison dimension and relative in-group size upon intergroup discrimination. , 1989 .

[21]  W. Doise Individual and social identities in intergroup relations , 1988 .

[22]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Hard Sell: `Patter Merchanting' and the Strategic (Re)Production and Local Management of Economic Reasoning in the Sales Routines of Markt Pitchers , 1986 .

[23]  M. Billig The argumentative nature of holding strong views: a case study , 1989 .

[24]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[25]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter‐and intra‐group situations , 1988 .

[26]  H. Schreiber,et al.  Better or just different? Positive social identity by discrimination against, or by differentiation from outgroups , 1983 .

[27]  H. Tajfel Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[28]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[29]  M. Hogg,et al.  Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination , 1988 .

[30]  M. Mulkay,et al.  Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse , 1984 .

[31]  Jacob M. Rabbie,et al.  Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations , 1988 .

[32]  Charles Antaki,et al.  Analysing everyday explanation : a casebook of methods , 1989 .

[33]  van Knippenberg,et al.  The social dimension: Intergroup differences in group perceptions , 1984 .

[34]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification , 1988 .

[35]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Our masters' voices: The language and body language of politics , 1984 .

[36]  Cognitive aspects of prejudice. , 1969 .

[37]  J. M. Atkinson Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[38]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .