Design and preliminary testing of a high performance antiproton trap (HiPAT)

Antimatter represents the pinnacle of energy density, offering the potential to enhance current fusion/fission concepts enabling various classes of deep space missions. Current production rates are sufficient to support proof-of-concept evaluation of many key technologies associated with antimatter-derived propulsion. Storage has been identified as a key enabling technology for all antimatter-related operations, and as such is the current focus of this NASA-MSFC effort to design and fabricate a portable device capable of holding up to 10 12 particles. Hardware has been assembled and initial tests are underway to evaluate the trap behavior using electron gun generated, positive hydrogen ions. Ions have been stored for tens of minutes, limited by observed interaction with background gas. Additionally, radio frequency manipulation is being tested to increase lifetime by stabilizing the stored particles, potentially reducing their interaction with background gas, easing requirements on ultimate trap vacuum and precision mechanical alignment.

[1]  Gerald A. Smith,et al.  Antimatter Requirements and Energy Costs for Near-Term Propulsion Applications , 2000 .

[2]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Confinement and manipulation of non-neutral plasmas using rotating wall electric fields , 2000 .

[3]  Robert H. Frisbee,et al.  Evaluation of propulsion options for interstellar missions , 1998 .

[4]  R. Lewis,et al.  AIMStar: Antimatter initiated microfusion for pre-cursor interstellar missions , 1998 .

[5]  L. Perkins Antiproton fast ignition for Inertial Confinement Fusion , 1997 .

[6]  W. Gibbs Low-energy antiproton interaction with helium , 1997, nucl-th/9705007.

[7]  T. H. Rider Fundamental Constraints on Large-Scale Antimatter Rocket Propulsion , 1997 .

[8]  E. Cardiff,et al.  ANTIPROTON-CATALYZED MICROFISSION/FUSION PROPULSION SYSTEMS FOR EXPLORATION OF THE OUTER SOLAR SYSTEM AND BEYOND , 1996 .

[9]  Lutz Schweikhard,et al.  ISOLTRAP: a tandem Penning trap system for accurate on-line mass determination of short-lived isotopes , 1996 .

[10]  T. Goldman,et al.  Are antiprotons forever , 1995, hep-ex/9506015.

[11]  T. Kammash Comparison of Fusion/Antiproton Propulsion Systems for Interplanetary Travel , 1995 .

[12]  Moore,et al.  Electrostatic modes of ion-trap plasmas. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[13]  D. Wineland,et al.  Electrostatic Modes of Ion-Trap Plasmas | NIST , 1993 .

[14]  D. L. Galbraith,et al.  Antimatter-driven fusion propulsion scheme for solar system exploration , 1992 .

[15]  Haas,et al.  Thousandfold improvement in the measured antiproton mass. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[16]  S. Howe,et al.  Portable Pbars, traps that travel , 1987 .

[17]  G. Vulpetti A propulsion-oriented synthesis of the antiproton-nucleon annihilation experimental results , 1984 .

[18]  D. L. Morgan Concepts for the design of an antimatter annihilation rocket , 1982 .

[19]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Long-Time Containment of a Pure Electron Plasma , 1980 .

[20]  V. Hughes,et al.  ATOMIC PROCESSES INVOLVED IN MATTER--ANTIMATTER ANNIHILATION. , 1970 .

[21]  L. Brillouin A Theorem of Larmor and Its Importance for Electrons in Magnetic Fields , 1945 .

[22]  P. H,et al.  Energy Costs for Near-term Propulsion Applications , 2022 .