The Use of Mini-Plates for the Treatment of a High-Angle, Dual Bite, Class II Malocclusion.

To present a case report of an orthodontic treatment of a high-angle, dual bite, Class II malocclusion without extractions and with the use of mini-plates. Class II malocclusion treatment protocols vary according to the morphological component of the malocclusion and the magnitude and direction of craniofacial growth. It is generally agreed that the cooperation of the patient and careful planning of anchorage are the key determinants of successful treatment. Protrusion of the upper and lower lip and a retrognathic mandible were the patient's chief concerns. The patient had learned to project her mandible forward to disguise the overjet. The patient's parents elected to correct the malocclusion with the use of bilateral infrazygomatic mini-plates. Pre-treatment condylar stabilization with an orthotic established a stable centric relation position, followed by mounting of the models on a semi-adjustable Panadent articulator. This allowed diagnosis and treatment planning from a stable condylar position and eliminated possible misdiagnosis due to the dual bite. Distal retraction and vertical control of the upper teeth enabled correction of the Class II malocclusion with minimal patient cooperation. Mini-plate-assisted treatment corrected the excessive overbite and overjet. The patient completed treatment with a stable occlusion and no longer postured her jaw forward. The parents and patient were completely satisfied with the positive treatment outcome. A 2-year follow-up confirmed the clinical stability.

[1]  M. Bayram,et al.  Treatment of a skeletal Class II malocclusion using fixed functional appliance with miniplate anchorage , 2014, European journal of dentistry.

[2]  Jeong-Yun Lee,et al.  Dentofacial characteristics in orthodontic patients with centric relation-maximum intercuspation discrepancy. , 2014, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  T. Ono,et al.  Asymmetrical distalization of maxillary molars with zygomatic anchorage, improved superelastic nickel-titanium alloy wires, and open-coil springs. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  M. Bayram,et al.  Effects of maxillary molar distalization with Zygoma-Gear Appliance. , 2012, The Angle orthodontist.

[5]  Xiao Deng,et al.  Correlation between centric relation–maximum intercuspation discrepancy and temporomandibular joint dysfunction , 2010, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[6]  Solange Mongelli de Fantini,et al.  Condylar displacement between centric relation and maximum intercuspation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  K. Takada,et al.  The difference in condylar position between centric relation and centric occlusion in pretreatment Japanese orthodontic patients. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  S D Crawford,et al.  Condylar axis position, as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[9]  Jorge Faber,et al.  Miniplacas permitem tratamento eficiente e eficaz da mordida aberta anterior , 2008 .

[10]  F. Cordray Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  S. Kandasamy,et al.  Centric relation: A historical and contemporary orthodontic perspective. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[12]  A. Afzal,et al.  Comparison of condylar positions in centric relation and centric occlusion in pre-treatment malocclusion cases. , 2005, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.

[13]  G. C. Dominguez,et al.  Increase of condylar displacement between centric relation and maximal habitual intercuspation after occlusal splint therapy. , 2005, Brazilian oral research.

[14]  R. N. Moore,et al.  Mandibular condyle position: comparison of articulator mountings and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  K. Igarashi,et al.  Nonextraction treatment with temporary skeletal anchorage devices to correct a Class II Division 2 malocclusion with excessive gingival display. , 2014, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  M. T. Sakima Ancoragem esquelética em Ortodontia - Parte I: miniplacas SAO (sistema de apoio ósseo para mecânica ortodôntica) , 2013 .

[17]  S. Padmanabhan,et al.  Comparative evaluation of condylar position in symptomatic (TMJ dysfunction) and asymptomatic individuals. , 2012, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[18]  R. R. Almeida-Pedrin,et al.  Prevalence of malocclusion in children aged 7 to 12 years , 2011 .

[19]  S T Hicks,et al.  Recording condylar movement with two facebow systems. , 1996, The Angle orthodontist.

[20]  W. S. Hunter,et al.  The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements. , 1994, The Angle orthodontist.