Relationships between taxonomic resolution and spatial scales of multivariate variation

Summary 1. We investigated the effects of changes in taxonomic resolution on analyses of patterns of multivariate variation at different spatial scales for the highly diverse fauna inhabiting holdfasts of the kelp Ecklonia radiata . 2. Multivariate analyses were performed using several transformations to examine differences in spatial patterns of variation from metres up to hundreds of kilometres for composition vs. relative abundance in assemblages. 3. The greatest variability in assemblages occurred at the smallest spatial scale, from plant to plant, pointing to the existence of important small-scale processes. The proportional amount of variation at the smallest spatial scale decreased with decreasing taxonomic resolution (i.e. from species through to phyla). For composition, the next-greatest source of variation was at the largest spatial scale (hundreds of kilometres), while for relative abundance, the next-greatest source of variation was at the level of sites (hundreds of metres to kilometres). 4. For abundance data, location-level variation became less important and site-level variation became more important with decreasing taxonomic resolution, while for compositional data, the opposite pattern occurred. This suggests that variation in the presence of species or taxa at a particular location along the coast is driven by large-scale processes, while variation in relative abundances within locations is driven by mediumscale processes. 5. The lack of significant variation in the proportional abundances of phyla at large spatial scales suggests that some consistency of pattern may emerge at larger scales (spatial and/or taxonomic), even in the presence of high small-scale variability. These findings strengthen the idea that substantial local variation need not preclude the existence of broad-scale organization in ecological patterns and biodiversity.

[1]  K. M. Norderhaug,et al.  Colonisation of kelp imitations by epiphyte and holdfast fauna; a study of mobility patterns , 2002 .

[2]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[3]  E. Bourget,et al.  Importance of physical and biological settlement cues used at different spatial scales by the larvae of Semibalanus balanoides , 1988 .

[4]  Stephen Widdicombe,et al.  Small scale patterns in the structure of macrofaunal assemblages of shallow soft sediments , 1999 .

[5]  M. Thiel,et al.  Are kelp holdfasts islands on the ocean floor? — indication for temporarily closed aggregations of peracarid crustaceans , 2000 .

[6]  M. Chapman,et al.  Scales of spatial patterns of distribution of intertidal invertebrates , 1996, Oecologia.

[7]  T. Ward,et al.  Effect of reducing taxonomic resolution on ordinations to detect pollution-induced gradients in macrobenthic infaunal assemblages , 1996 .

[8]  J. Connell The Influence of Interspecific Competition and Other Factors on the Distribution of the Barnacle Chthamalus Stellatus , 1961 .

[9]  S. Connell,et al.  Opposing states of subtidal habitat across temperate Australia: consistency and predictability in kelp canopy-benthic associations , 2002 .

[10]  M. Thiel,et al.  Are kelp holdfasts islands on the ocean floor? – indication for temporarily closed aggregations of peracarid crustaceans , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[11]  L. Benedetti-Cecchi,et al.  Variability in abundance of algae and invertebrates at different spatial scales on rocky sea shores , 2001 .

[12]  Stephen D. A. Smith,et al.  Recovery of benthic communities at Macquarie Island (sub-Antarctic) following a small oil spill , 1998 .

[13]  L. Goldwasser,et al.  THE ROLE OF DISPERSAL AND DISTURBANCE IN DETERMINING SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY IN SEDENTARY ORGANISMS , 2000 .

[14]  SCALE-DEPENDENT RECOLONIZATION: THE ROLE OF SEDIMENT , 1996 .

[15]  R. Macarthur The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture , 2005 .

[16]  B. Gillanders,et al.  Variations in the configuration of algae in subtidal forests: Implications for invertebrate assemblages , 2004 .

[17]  P.,et al.  Invertebrate communities in holdfasts of the kelp Macrocystis pyrifera from southern Chile , 2006 .

[18]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance in ecology , 2001 .

[19]  M. Chapman Relationships between spatial patterns of benthic assemblages in a mangrove forest using different levels of taxonomic resolution , 1998 .

[20]  T. Glasby Estimating spatial variability in developing assemblages of epibiota on subtidal hard substrata , 1998 .

[21]  S. Fraschetti,et al.  Spatial variability and human disturbance in shallow subtidal hard substrate assemblages: a regional approach , 2001 .

[22]  P. Somerfield,et al.  Taxonomic levels, in marine community studies, revisited , 1995 .

[23]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance , 2003 .

[24]  Luigi Salmaso,et al.  Permutation Tests for Univariate and Multivariate Ordered Categorical Data , 2006 .

[25]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[26]  S. Connell,et al.  Can habitat loss be treated independently of habitat configuration? Implications for rare and common taxa in fragmented landscapes , 2002 .

[27]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Statistical Design And Analysis For A Biological Effects Study , 1988 .

[28]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[29]  D. Srivastava Using local–regional richness plots to test for species saturation: pitfalls and potentials , 1999 .

[30]  Jennifer L. Dungan,et al.  A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis , 2002 .

[31]  S. Frontier,et al.  Utilisation d'une cotation d'abondance fondée sur une progression géométrique, pour l'analyse des composantes principales en écologie planctonique , 1974 .

[32]  D. Schiel Macroalgal assemblages in New Zealand: structure, interactions and demography , 1990, Hydrobiologia.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variance Components , 2003 .

[34]  J. Lawton,et al.  Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities : a theoretical perspective , 1992 .

[35]  A. Balmford,et al.  Using higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness: II. Local applications , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  P. Archambault,et al.  Scales of coastal heterogeneity and benthic intertidal species richness, diversity and abundance , 1996 .

[37]  W. Sousa Disturbance in Marine Intertidal Boulder Fields: The Nonequilibrium Maintenance of Species Diversity , 1979 .

[38]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[39]  P. Somerfield,et al.  Surrogates in marine benthic investigations ‐ which taxonomic unit to target? , 2000 .

[40]  Paul J. Somerfield,et al.  Relationships between taxonomic resolution macrobenthic community patterns and disturbance , 1998 .

[41]  A. Edwards Ecological studies of the kelp, Laminaria hyperborea, and its associated fauna in South-West Ireland , 1980 .

[42]  A. Koukouras,et al.  The macrofaunal community of Ecklonia radiata holdfasts: description of the faunal assemblage and variation associated with differences in holdfast volume , 1996 .

[43]  P. Moore The kelp fauna of northeast Britain. III. Qualitative and quantitative ordinations, and the utility of a multivariate approach , 1974 .

[44]  M. Chapman Variability in trail-following and aggregation in Nodilittorina unifasciata Gray , 1998 .

[45]  N. Andrew,et al.  Sampling and the description of spatial pattern in marine ecology , 1987 .

[46]  M. Riddle,et al.  Human impacts in soft-sediment assemblages at Casey Station, East Antarctica: Spatial variation, taxonomic resolution and data transformation , 2003 .

[47]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Spatial variation in larval concentrations as a cause of spatial variation in settlement for the barnacle, Balanus glandula , 1985, Oecologia.

[48]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Larval settlement rate: A leading determinant of structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  N. Stork,et al.  Assessing biodiversity 'sampling packages': how similar are arthropod assemblages in different tropical rainforests? , 2001, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[50]  K. Gaston,et al.  Mapping biodiversity using surrogates for species richness: macro-scales and New World birds , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression , 2001 .

[52]  Brian H. McArdle,et al.  FITTING MULTIVARIATE MODELS TO COMMUNITY DATA: A COMMENT ON DISTANCE‐BASED REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[53]  R. Warwick The level of taxonomic discrimination required to detect pollution effects on marine benthic communities , 1988 .

[54]  D. Jones Ecological studies on macroinvertebrate populations associated with polluted kelp forests in the North Sea , 1971, Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen.

[55]  M. Crawley,et al.  Scale dependence in plant biodiversity. , 2001, Science.

[56]  P. Sale,et al.  Persistence of community structure: what happens when you change taxonomic scale? , 1992, Coral Reefs.

[57]  Denis Marcotte,et al.  Variance and spatial scales in a tropical rain forest: changing the size of sampling units , 1997, Plant Ecology.

[58]  Miriam Fernández,et al.  Latitudinal trends of species diversity in rocky intertidal herbivore assemblages: spatial scale and the relationship between local and regional species richness , 2002 .

[59]  Underwood,et al.  Observations in ecology: you can't make progress on processes without understanding the patterns. , 2000, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology.

[60]  Pierre Dutilleul,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1993 .

[61]  R. Cole,et al.  Using spatial pattern analysis to distinguish causes of mortality: an example from kelp in north‐eastern New Zealand , 1999 .

[62]  R. Kitching,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in food webs in water-filled treeholes , 1987 .

[63]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy Perspectives for Ecological Complexity /T.F.H. Allen and Thomas B. Starr. --. -- , 1982 .

[64]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Study of the fauna inhabiting the holdfasts of Laminaria hyperborea (gunn.) fosl. along some environmental and geographical gradients , 1980 .

[65]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[66]  A. Underwood,et al.  11. Paradigms, Explanations, and Generalizations in Models for the Structure of Intertidal Communities on Rocky Shores , 1984 .

[67]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Spatial variation in soft-sediment benthos , 1992 .

[68]  H. Cornell,et al.  Species Richness of Reef-Building Corals Determined by Local and Regional Processes , 1996 .

[69]  D. Schiel,et al.  The structure of subtidal algal stands in temperature waters , 1986 .

[70]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Measuring more of biodiversity: Can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? , 1994 .