Estimation and efficient computation of the true probability of recurrence of short linear protein sequence motifs in unrelated proteins

BackgroundLarge datasets of protein interactions provide a rich resource for the discovery of Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs) that recur in unrelated proteins. However, existing methods for estimating the probability of motif recurrence may be biased by the size and composition of the search dataset, such that p- value estimates from different datasets, or from motifs containing different numbers of non-wildcard positions, are not strictly comparable. Here, we develop more exact methods and explore the potential biases of computationally efficient approximations.ResultsA widely used heuristic for the calculation of motif over-representation approximates motif probability by assuming that all proteins have the same length and composition. We introduce pv, which calculates the probability exactly. Secondly, the recently introduced SLiMFinder statistic Sig, accounts for multiple testing (across all possible motifs) in motif discovery. However, it approximates the probability of all other possible motifs, occurring with a score of p or less, as being equal to p. Here, we show that the exhaustive calculation of the probability of all possible motif occurrences that are as rare or rarer than the motif of interest, Sig', may be carried out efficiently by grouping motifs of a common probability (i.e. those which have permuted orders of the same residues). Sig'v, which corrects both approximations, is shown to be uniformly distributed in a random dataset when searching for non-ambiguous motifs, indicating that it is a robust significance measure.ConclusionsA method is presented to compute exactly the true probability of a non-ambiguous short protein sequence motif, and the utility of an approximate approach for novel motif discovery across a large number of datasets is demonstrated.

[1]  A. F. Neuwald,et al.  Detecting patterns in protein sequences. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  D. Higgins,et al.  Finding flexible patterns in unaligned protein sequences , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Leszek Rychlewski,et al.  ELM server: a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Amos Bairoch,et al.  Recent improvements to the PROSITE database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  T. Gibson,et al.  Systematic Discovery of New Recognition Peptides Mediating Protein Interaction Networks , 2005, PLoS biology.

[8]  R. Russell,et al.  Linear motifs: Evolutionary interaction switches , 2005, FEBS letters.

[9]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al.  IUPred: web server for the prediction of intrinsically unstructured regions of proteins based on estimated energy content , 2005, Bioinform..

[11]  Richard R Copley,et al.  The EH1 motif in metazoan transcription factors , 2005, BMC Genomics.

[12]  K. S. Deshpande,et al.  Human protein reference database—2006 update , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Richard J. Edwards,et al.  Absolute Net Charge and the Biological Activity of Oligopeptides , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[14]  J. H. Shinn,et al.  Minimotif Miner: a tool for investigating protein function , 2006, Nature Methods.

[15]  Robert B. Russell,et al.  DILIMOT: discovery of linear motifs in proteins , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  István Simon,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS ORIGINAL PAPER doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm035 Structural bioinformatics Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs , 2022 .

[17]  Richard J. Edwards,et al.  SLiMFinder: A Probabilistic Method for Identifying Over-Represented, Convergently Evolved, Short Linear Motifs in Proteins , 2007, PloS one.

[18]  Marc A. Martí-Renom,et al.  Characterization of Protein Hubs by Inferring Interacting Motifs from Protein Interactions , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  Alex Bateman,et al.  Reuse of structural domain–domain interactions in protein networks , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  Contextual Specificity in Peptide-Mediated Protein Interactions , 2008, PloS one.

[21]  T. Gibson,et al.  A careful disorderliness in the proteome: Sites for interaction and targets for future therapies , 2008, FEBS letters.

[22]  Niall J. Haslam,et al.  Understanding eukaryotic linear motifs and their role in cell signaling and regulation. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[23]  Toby J. Gibson,et al.  Discovery of candidate KEN-box motifs using Cell Cycle keyword enrichment combined with native disorder prediction and motif conservation , 2008, Bioinform..

[24]  Nicholas A. Hamilton,et al.  LOCATE: a mammalian protein subcellular localization database , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  Richard J. Edwards,et al.  Masking residues using context-specific evolutionary conservation significantly improves short linear motif discovery , 2009, Bioinform..

[26]  Allegra Via,et al.  Phospho.ELM: a database of phosphorylation sites—update 2008 , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..