Compensation and profit distribution for cooperative green pickup and delivery problem

Cooperation is a powerful strategy to achieve the objective of the green pickup and delivery problem (GPDP) that minimizes carbon emissions of pickup and delivery service. However, the cooperative GPDP may not be accepted by all the partners, as the cost of cooperative GPDP may be higher than that of the non-cooperative minimum cost PDP. Therefore, a reasonable compensation mechanism is desired to form an acceptable cooperative GPDP, and a fair method of profit distribution, based on the mechanism, is needed to stabilize the cooperation. In this paper, we analyze the situations in which a compensation is needed and develop the lower bound of the compensation. Further, we propose an exact method to calculate the actual compensation and the profit distribution based on cooperative game theory. The proposed exact method can efficiently solve the largest scale instance in Li & Lim benchmarks, i.e., pdptw1000-LR1_10_1 with 1,054 customers and 19,306 products. The proposed compensation and profit distribution mechanism based on cooperative game theory is also applied to a real-world GPDP and achieve satisfactory performance. Some interesting and important managerial insights are found and discussed.

[1]  Jeroen Kuipers,et al.  Sharing costs in highways: A game theoretic approach , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  C. K. Y. Lin,et al.  A cooperative strategy for a vehicle routing problem with pickup and delivery time windows , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[3]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  A review of recent research on green road freight transportation , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  Geometric Properties of the Kernel, Nucleolus, and Related Solution Concepts , 1979, Math. Oper. Res..

[5]  Kanok Boriboonsomsin,et al.  Real-World Carbon Dioxide Impacts of Traffic Congestion , 2008 .

[6]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  The time-dependent pollution-routing problem , 2013 .

[7]  Yalin Lei,et al.  Decomposition analysis of energy-related carbon emissions from the transportation sector in Beijing , 2015, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[8]  Jean-François Cordeau,et al.  A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for the Dial-a-Ride Problem , 2006, Oper. Res..

[9]  Abdullah Konak,et al.  The heterogeneous green vehicle routing and scheduling problem with time-varying traffic congestion , 2016 .

[10]  L. Shapley A Value for n-person Games , 1988 .

[11]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  The Pollution-Routing Problem , 2011 .

[12]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Cooperative game theory approach to allocating benefits of horizontal cooperation , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  The fleet size and mix pollution-routing problem , 2014 .

[14]  Mikael Rönnqvist,et al.  Cost Allocation in Collaborative Forest Transportation , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  David Pisinger,et al.  An Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search Heuristic for the Pickup and Delivery Problem with Time Windows , 2006, Transp. Sci..

[16]  Yongjia Song,et al.  A Branch-Cut-and-Price Algorithm for the Energy Minimization Vehicle Routing Problem , 2016, Transp. Sci..

[17]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: request allocation and profit sharing , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  Matthew Barth,et al.  Development of a Heavy-Duty Diesel Modal Emissions and Fuel Consumption Model , 2005 .

[19]  Mauro Caputo,et al.  Internal, vertical and horizontal logistics integration in Italian grocery distribution , 1996 .

[20]  Tom Van Woensel,et al.  An Exact Approach for a Variant of the Pollution-Routing Problem , 2017, Transp. Sci..

[21]  G. Owen,et al.  A Simple Expression for the Shapley Value in a Special Case , 1973 .

[22]  Kanok Boriboonsomsin,et al.  Energy and emissions impacts of a freeway-based dynamic eco-driving system , 2009 .

[23]  Junwei Wang,et al.  Robustness Assessment of Urban Road Network with Consideration of Multiple Hazard Events , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  The bi-objective Pollution-Routing Problem , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Estela Sánchez-Rodríguez,et al.  A natural selection from the core of a TU game: the core-center , 2007, Int. J. Game Theory.

[26]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Equitable apportionment of railcars within a pooling agreement for shipping automobiles , 2011 .

[27]  Brian Caulfield,et al.  Estimating the environmental benefits of ride-sharing: A case study of Dublin , 2009 .

[28]  Junwei Wang,et al.  Reducing carbon emission of pickup and delivery using integrated scheduling , 2016 .

[29]  Qie He,et al.  A disjunctive convex programming approach to the pollution-routing problem , 2016 .