Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening.

Seventeen hearing-impaired adults were fit with omnidirectional/directional hearing aids, which they wore during a four-week trial. For each listening situation encountered in daily living during a total of seven days, participants selected the preferred microphone mode and described the listening situation in terms of five environmental variables, using a paper and pencil form. Results indicated that hearing-impaired adults typically spend the majority of their active listening time in situations with background noise present and surrounding the listener, and the signal source located in front and relatively near. Microphone preferences were fairly evenly distributed across listening situations but differed depending on the characteristics of the listening environment. The omnidirectional mode tended to be preferred in relatively quiet listening situations or, in the presence of background noise, when the signal source was relatively far away. The directional mode tended to be preferred when background noise was present and the signal source was located in front of and relatively near the listener. Results suggest that knowing only signal location and distance and whether background noise is present or absent, omnidirectional/directional hearing aids can be set in the preferred mode in most everyday listening situations. These findings have relevance for counseling patients when to set manually switchable omnidirectional/directional hearing aids in each microphone mode, as well as for the development of automatic algorithms for selecting omnidirectional versus directional microphone processing.

[1]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  Sergei Kochkin Consumers Rate Improvements Sought in Hearing Instruments , 2002 .

[3]  T Ricketts,et al.  Predicting directional hearing aid benefit for individual listeners. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  A M Amlani,et al.  Efficacy of directional microphone hearing aids: a meta-analytic perspective. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  Paula P. Henry,et al.  Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid: Evaluación de un auxiliar auditivo de micrófono direccional adaptable , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[6]  C A Sammeth,et al.  Field trial evaluations of a switched directional/omnidirectional in-the-ear hearing instrument. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[7]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Advantages of directional hearing aid microphones related to room acoustics. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[8]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Mary T Cord,et al.  Influence of environmental factors on hearing aid microphone preference. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[10]  C Ludvigsen,et al.  Effect of hearing aids with directional microphones in different acoustic environments. , 1978, Scandinavian audiology.

[11]  T Ricketts,et al.  Impact of Noise Source Configuration on Directional Hearing Aid Benefit and Performance , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[12]  Mary T Cord,et al.  Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[13]  Gerald A. Studebaker,et al.  Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance , 1992 .

[14]  Mary T Cord,et al.  Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[15]  M Valente,et al.  Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[16]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[17]  J Jerger,et al.  Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. , 1970, Archives of otolaryngology.

[18]  T. Ricketts Directional Hearing Aids , 2001, Trends in amplification.

[20]  R K Surr,et al.  Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.