The real option value of mining operations using mean-reverting commodity prices

By determining the optimal price threshold of mining activation, this research aims at estimating a mine’s in situ value by incorporating its real option value (ROV). The traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) method, the standard tool for economic feasibility studies in mineral industry, can be problematic since it fails to address uncertainties and operational flexibilities (Trigeorgis Adv Futures Options Res 4:S1537164, 1990; Schwartz J Financ 3:923–973, 1997; Slade J Environ Econ Manag 41:193–233, 2001; Abdel Sabour and Dimitrakopoulos J Min Sci 47(2):191–201, 2011). DCF normally results in under-evaluation when significant price variability is present in commodity prices such as gold, silver, copper, and recently rare earths. A mining project is more valuable in expected value terms if it is activated following an appropriately chosen price threshold. In this work, the commodity price is modeled using a mean-reverting process, which is more relevant to commodity economics than the generally used Geometric Brownian motion process (Pindyck and Rubinfeld 1991). It is shown that the value of flexibility is significant and peaks when mining cost equals spot price; the exercising price threshold increases as average cost rises and probabilities of exercising the option are estimated. ROV method provides a tractable and realistic scheme to evaluate a mine’s in situ value and a strategy to manage mining activities.

[1]  James S. Dyer,et al.  A Discrete Time Approach for Modeling Two-Factor Mean-Reverting Stochastic Processes , 2011, Decis. Anal..

[2]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Evaluating Natural Resource Investments , 1985 .

[3]  J. Hull Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives , 1989 .

[4]  Valuation of Mining Projects Using Option Pricing Techniques , 2007 .

[5]  Roussos Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Evaluating mine plans under uncertainty: Can the real options make a difference? , 2007 .

[6]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[7]  Antonio Nieto,et al.  Cutoff grade economic strategy for byproduct mineral commodity operation: rare earth case study , 2013 .

[8]  J. Gould,et al.  Optimisation with options , 2011 .

[9]  R. Poulin,et al.  A flexible mine production model based on stochastic price simulations: application at Raglan mine, Canada , 2007 .

[10]  Vassilios Kazakidis,et al.  Decision Making in Flexible Mine Production System Design Using Real Options , 2007 .

[11]  Gillespie,et al.  Exact numerical simulation of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process and its integral. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[12]  G. Davis,et al.  Valuing uncertain asset cash flows when there are no options: A real options approach , 2005 .

[13]  Eduardo S. Schwartz The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: Implications for valuation and hedging , 1997 .

[14]  Peter Tufano,et al.  When are Real Options Exercised? An Empirical Study of Mine Closings , 2000 .

[15]  Francis A. Longstaff,et al.  Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach , 2001 .

[16]  To Open Or Not To Open-Or What To Do With A Closed Copper Mine , 2002 .

[17]  R. McDonald,et al.  The Value of Waiting to Invest , 1982 .

[18]  Gonzalo Cortazar,et al.  Optimal Timing of a Mine Expansion: Implementing a Real Options Model , 1998 .

[19]  R. Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Incorporating geological and market uncertainties and operational flexibility into open pit mine design , 2011 .

[20]  Jens Bengtsson,et al.  Manufacturing flexibility and real options: A review , 2001 .

[21]  D. Rubinfeld,et al.  Econometric models and economic forecasts , 2002 .

[22]  M. Slade Valuing Managerial Flexibility: An Application of Real-Option Theory to Mining Investments , 2001 .

[23]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach , 1999 .