Responses to cued signals in Parkinson's disease. Distinguishing between disorders of cognition and of activation.

Impairment of movement execution in Parkinson's disease could be due to disorders of cognition and/or of activation. These two factors are hard to separate by measuring response times only. Therefore, in this study response force and event-related EEG potentials were measured continuously during tasks in which subjects had to respond to cued signals. Fifteen patients with Parkinson's disease and 15 healthy subjects were studied during two tasks: (i) the 'clock task', in which the signal's identity was fully precued but its presentation time was uncertain and (ii) the 'validity task' in which the cue did not always predict the response validly. Thus, the clock task required more sustained attention, and the validity task sometimes required fast switching. The patients generally responded slower than control subjects. In the clock task, the response times of both groups changed to the same extent with presentation time, whereas in the validity task the patients were additionally slower than the control group with invalidly cued signals. The patients generally had a weaker response force and a lower rate of force production. In the clock task, both force measures changed with presentation time in the control group only, whereas in the validity task, the two measures increased in both groups to the same extent with invalidly cued signals. The contingent negative variation amplitudes in the patients' event-related EEG potentials were reduced, reflecting reduced activation of movement preparation, whereas lateralization of the motor cortices (i.e. the lateralized readiness potential) did not differ significantly between groups, reflecting unimpaired response selection. Force and contingent negative variation were generally reduced in the patients showing that their general slowing is at least partially due to impaired activation. Task-specific problems added to the general activation deficit; the lack of modulation of response force by presentation time revealed pronounced deficits of activation in the monotonous clock task. The specific delay of responses with invalidly cued signals, unparalleled by activation measures, might suggest a problem of cognition. The task-specific deficits may reflect a basic dilemma for patients with Parkinson's disease: cognitive problems may arise in complex tasks but disorders of activation may become pronounced in more simple, monotonous tasks.

[1]  C D Marsden,et al.  Simple and choice reaction time and the use of advance information for motor preparation in Parkinson's disease. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  G. Geffen,et al.  Event-related potentials associated with covert orientation of visual attention in Parkinson's disease , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  J. Winn,et al.  Brain , 1878, The Lancet.

[4]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  The magnetic counterpart of the contingent negative variation. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  P. Jaśkowski,et al.  Impending Electrical Shock Can Affect Response Force in a Simple Reaction Task , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  C. Brunia,et al.  Is a stimulus conveying task-relevant information a sufficient condition to elicit a stimulus-preceding negativity? , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[7]  K. Pribram,et al.  Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention. , 1975, Psychological review.

[8]  L. Mulder,et al.  Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  A Kok,et al.  Selective processing of two-dimensional visual stimuli in young and old subjects: electrophysiological analysis. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[10]  W Ritter,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a verbal working memory deficit in multiple sclerosis. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  N Birbaumer,et al.  P3 and contingent negative variation in Parkinson's disease. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Slow cortical potentials in Parkinsonian patients during the course of an associative learning task , 1990 .

[13]  R. Passingham,et al.  Relation between cerebral activity and force in the motor areas of the human brain. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  E Wascher,et al.  The interaction of stimulus- and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  J Miller,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  H. Tachibana,et al.  Actively and passively evoked P3 latency of event-related potentials in Parkinson's disease , 1992, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[17]  Brian L. Day,et al.  Aspects of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease , 1990 .

[18]  James E. Skinner,et al.  Central Gating Mechanisms That Regulate Event-Related Potentials and Behavior , 1984 .

[19]  K. Hirayama,et al.  Covert orienting attention in Parkinson's disease. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[20]  S. L. Visser,et al.  Disturbed frontal regulation of attention in Parkinson's disease. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Klaus P. Ebmeier A quantitative method for the assessment of overall effects from a number of similar electrophysiological studies: description and application to event-related potentials in Parkinson's disease. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  C. Frith,et al.  Routes to action in reaction time tasks , 1986, Psychological research.

[23]  A. Kok,et al.  Arousal and effort: a review and theoretical synthesis of studies of age-related changes in event-related potentials. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[24]  J C Rothwell,et al.  The Bereitschaftspotential is abnormal in Parkinson's disease. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  K. Flowers,et al.  Programming and execution of movement in Parkinson's disease. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Does Immediate Arousal Enhance Response Force in Simple Reaction Time? , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[27]  S. Fahn Members of the UPDRS Development Committee. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale , 1987 .

[28]  F. Jaroszyk,et al.  The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans. , 1995, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[29]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behavior. , 1990, Physiological reviews.

[30]  C. Brunia,et al.  Motor and non-motor aspects of slow brain potentials , 1994, Biological Psychology.

[31]  István Czigler,et al.  Event-related potentials and aging: Identification of deviant visual stimuli , 1994 .

[32]  C. Marsden The mysterious motor function of the basal ganglia , 1982, Neurology.