Effect of primary emulsions on microsphere size and protein-loading in the double emulsion process.

Incorporation of a protein drug in microspheres made of a hydrophobic polymer is commonly achieved via double liquid-liquid emulsification (w/o/w) or by dispersing a powdered protein in a polymer solution followed by liquid-liquid emulsification (s/o/w). This study focused on the effect of the first operating step in both processes on the size and protein-loading of the microspheres. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as the model protein and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was used as the model polymer. The w/o emulsion was characterized based on the degree of emulsion fineness which was controlled using rotor/stator homogenization. The s/o emulsion was characterized based on protein powder size and shape. Protein powders of different sizes and shapes were produced using different powder preparation methods. In both emulsification processes, the second operating step which produced the microspheres was conducted in either a continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) or a static mixer. The size of the microspheres thus prepared was found to increase with increasing size of the protein powder in the s/o/w system but increase with decreasing size of the liquid emulsion droplets in the w/o/w system. Empirical correlations can accurately predict the size of the microspheres if the size of w/o emulsion droplets and protein powder is 10 x less than the microsphere size. Protein loading in the microspheres decreased with respect to increases in w/o emulsion droplet size or in protein powder size. We propose that these phenomena are attributed to two mechanisms, fragmentation along the weak routes in the w/o/w system and particle redistribution as the result of terminal velocity in the s/o/w system. The role of protein powder shape was not significant until the protein powder size exceeded 5 microns. Irregular-shaped protein powders resulted in lower encapsulation efficiency than spherical-shaped protein powders.

[1]  T. Kondo,et al.  Studies on microcapsules. VI. Effect of variations in polymerization condition on microcapsule size , 1970 .

[2]  D. Poncelet,et al.  Preparation of hemolysate-filled hexamethylene sebacamide microcapsules with controlled diameter , 1990 .

[3]  J. Nairn,et al.  Effect of viscosity and interfacial tension on particle size of cellulose acetate trimellitate microspheres. , 1992, Journal of microencapsulation.

[4]  Tracy Chen,et al.  Formulation concerns of protein drugs , 1992 .

[5]  Y. Maa,et al.  Liquid-liquid emulsification by static mixers for use in microencapsulation. , 1996, Journal of microencapsulation.

[6]  R. Bodmeier,et al.  Encapsulation of water-soluble drugs by a modified solvent evaporation method. I. Effect of process and formulation variables on drug entrapment. , 1990, Journal of microencapsulation.

[7]  Chung C. Hsu,et al.  Liquid-liquid emulsification by rotor/stator homogenization , 1996 .

[8]  R. Jerome,et al.  Effect of the emulsion stability on the morphology and porosity of semicrystalline poly l-lactide microparticles prepared by w/o/w double emulsion-evaporation , 1994 .

[9]  L. Brown,et al.  A Revolution in Therapy , 1995 .

[10]  T. Kissel,et al.  Factors influencing the release of peptides and proteins from biodegradable parenteral depot systems , 1992 .

[11]  Y. Maa,et al.  Microencapsulation reactor scale-up by dimensional analysis. , 1996, Journal of microencapsulation.

[12]  T Yashiki,et al.  A new technique to efficiently entrap leuprolide acetate into microcapsules of polylactic acid or copoly(lactic/glycolic) acid. , 1988, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin.