The Use of Higher-Level Constraints in Monitoring for a Change in Speaker Demonstrates Functionally Distinct Levels of Representation in Discourse Comprehension.

Abstract We test and disprove the common assumption that pragmatic probability facilitates the processing of lower linguistic levels. Two experiments show that detection of the acoustic properties that distinguish two speakers is harder in sentences that are pragmatically more probable. At the same time. detection of the same acoustic properties is easier at later points in a clause than at earlier points. The pragmatic inhibition in detecting acoustic properties suggests that different levels of linguistic processing compete for processing resources, while the within-sentence facilitation suggests limited interactions between processes at adjacent levels. The two results together demonstrate that discourse-level and sentence-level representations are functionally distinct during comprehension, and they force a modification of the view that linguistic processes at different levels of representation occur in architecturally segregated “modules” that do not share resources. We argue that two levels of repre...

[1]  A. Healy,et al.  Detection errors in a task with articulatory suppression: Phonological receding and reading , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Use of Cognitive Capacity in Reading: Effects of Some Content Features of Text. , 1983 .

[3]  N Cowan,et al.  Cross-modal, auditory-visual Stroop interference and possible implications for speech memory , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology , 1984 .

[5]  A. Samuel.  Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  R. Cole.  Listening for mispronunciations: A measure of what we hear during speech , 1973 .

[7]  R L Diehl,et al.  Conditions on rate normalization in speech perception , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[9]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[10]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Use of Cognitive Capacity in Reading: A Performance Operating Characteristic , 1981 .

[11]  Z. S. Bond,et al.  Influence of semantics on speech perception , 1977 .

[12]  A M Liberman,et al.  A specialization for speech perception. , 1989, Science.

[13]  I. Pollack,et al.  The Intelligibility of Excerpts from Conversation , 1963 .

[14]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Word recognition: Context effects without priming , 1986, Cognition.

[15]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Use of cognitive capacity in reading identical texts with different amounts of discourse level meaning. , 1979 .

[16]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Reading and cognitive capacity usage: Effects of text difficulty. , 1978 .

[17]  William D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Syntactic Context and Lexical Access , 1984 .

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[20]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Memory, meaning, and syntax , 1980 .

[21]  J Grimshaw,et al.  Verb processing during sentence comprehension: Contextual impenetrability , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[22]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Speech Perception as a Cognitive Process: The Interactive Activation Model. , 1983 .

[23]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[24]  V. M. Holmes.  Parsing strategies and discourse context , 1984 .

[25]  K. Suomi,et al.  On talker and phoneme information conveyed by vowels: A whole spectrum approach to the normalization problem , 1984, Speech Commun..

[26]  R. Cole,et al.  Listening for mispronunciations in a children's story: The use of context by children and adults , 1980 .

[27]  J. Fodor.  Précis of The Modularity of Mind , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Investigating the boundaries of reading units: letter detection in misspelled words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Identifying the speech codes , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  Helen Smith Cairns,et al.  Effects of prior context upon the integration of lexical information during sentence processing , 1981 .

[32]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The On-Line Effects of Semantic Context on Syntactic Processing , 1977 .

[34]  Betty Ann Levy,et al.  Proofreading familiar text: Allocating resources to perceptual and conceptual processes , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[35]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules , 1963 .

[36]  WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON,et al.  Processing structure of sentence perception , 1975, Nature.

[37]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Interclause relations and clausal processing , 1978 .

[38]  David W. Green,et al.  The Immediate Processing of Sentences , 1977 .

[39]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The access and processing of idiomatic expressions , 1979 .

[40]  T. Bever,et al.  Natural units of representation interact during sentence comprehension , 1982 .

[41]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[42]  Howard Steven Kurtzman,et al.  Studies in syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1985 .

[43]  Richard R. Hurtig.  The validity of clausal processing strategies at the discourse level , 1978 .

[44]  J. Elman,et al.  Perceptual switching in bilinguals , 1977 .

[45]  V. Tartter,et al.  Laterality differences in speaker and consonant identification in dichotic listening , 1982, Brain and Language.

[46]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[47]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  R. M. Warren.  Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[49]  J. Morton,et al.  Effect of word transitional probability on phoneme identification , 1976 .