Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems

PURPOSE Few studies have investigated the marginal accuracy of 3-unit zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of zirconia FPDs made using two CAD/CAM systems with that of metal-ceramic FPDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Artificial resin maxillary central and lateral incisors were prepared for 3-unit FPDs and fixed in yellow stone. This model was duplicated to epoxy resin die. On the resin die, 15 three-unit FPDs were fabricated per group (45 in total): Group A, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Everest system; Group B, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Lava system; and Group C, metal-ceramic 3-unit FPDs. They were cemented to resin dies with resin cement. After removal of pontic, each retainer was separated and observed under a microscope (Presize 440C). Marginal gaps of experimental groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan test. RESULTS Mean marginal gaps of 3-unit FPDs were 60.46 µm for the Everest group, 78.71 µm for the Lava group, and 81.32 µm for the metal-ceramic group. The Everest group demonstrated significantly smaller marginal gap than the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P<.05). The marginal gap did not significantly differ between the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION The marginal gaps of anterior 3-unit zirconia FPD differed according to CAD/CAM systems, but still fell within clinically acceptable ranges compared with conventional metal-ceramic restoration.

[1]  J A Sorensen,et al.  A rationale for comparison of plaque-retaining properties of crown systems. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  S E Sorensen,et al.  Gingival and alveolar bone reaction to marginal fit of subgingival crown margins. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[3]  H Spiekermann,et al.  Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[4]  In-Sung Yeo,et al.  In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  B. Lang,et al.  Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  R. Cronin,et al.  Effect of metal design and technique on the marginal characteristics of the collarless metal ceramic restoration. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  M. Stiesch,et al.  Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses. , 2010, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[8]  G. Heydecke,et al.  Fracture load and marginal fit of shrinkage-free ZrSiO4 all-ceramic crowns after chewing simulation. , 2006, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[9]  W. Mörmann,et al.  Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[10]  L. Gauckler,et al.  Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. , 2006, Quintessence international.

[11]  José F L Lozano,et al.  A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. , 2009, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  M. Tuntiprawon,et al.  The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. , 1995, Australian dental journal.

[13]  P. Vigolo,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles. , 2008, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[14]  Florian Beuer,et al.  Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses , 2009, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[15]  Emeka Nkenke,et al.  Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. , 2005, European journal of oral sciences.

[16]  F. Beuer,et al.  Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations , 2008, BDJ.

[17]  M. Behr,et al.  Marginal Integrity of CAD/CAM Fixed Partial Dentures , 2007, European journal of dentistry.

[18]  Andreas Bindl,et al.  Fit of all-ceramic posterior fixed partial denture frameworks in vitro. , 2007, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[19]  Irena Sailer,et al.  Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. , 2007, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[20]  J. Mclean,et al.  The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique , 1971, British Dental Journal.

[21]  Stig Karlsson,et al.  Precision of a CAD/CAM technique for the production of zirconium dioxide copings. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[22]  Lothar Borchers,et al.  Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. , 2009, European journal of oral sciences.

[23]  Siegbert Witkowski,et al.  Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques. , 2006, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  Wael Att,et al.  Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses. , 2009, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  M I MacEntee,et al.  Fit of three porcelain-fused-to-metal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[26]  A H Tjan,et al.  Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown systems. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[27]  José F L Lozano,et al.  Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs. , 2009, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[28]  J Chai,et al.  Marginal fit of machine-milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns. , 1994, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[29]  J Abduo,et al.  Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. , 2010, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[30]  J Chai,et al.  A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. , 1997, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[31]  M. Roos,et al.  Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. , 2008, European journal of oral sciences.

[32]  Jae-ho Yang,et al.  A STUDY ON THE MARGINAL FIT OF COLLARLESS METAL CERAMIC FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES , 2005 .

[33]  D. Edelhoff,et al.  Influence of preparation angle on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia crown copings. , 2009, Quintessence international.

[34]  J R Strub,et al.  Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems , 2004, British Dental Journal.