Diversification in the internet economy: the role of for-profit mediators

We investigate market forces that would lead to the emergence of new classes of players in the sponsored search advertising market. We report a multi-fold diversification triggered by an inherent feature of the sponsored search market, namely, capacity constraints, arising from the fact that there is a limit on the number of available advertisement slots, especially for the popular keywords. As a result, a significant pool of interested advertisers are left out. We present a comparative study of two scenarios motivated by capacity constraints - one where the additional capacity is provided by for-profit agents (or, mediators), who compete for slots in the original auction, draw traffic, and run their own sub-auctions, and the other, where the additional capacity is provided by the auctioneer herself, by essentially acting as a mediator and running a single combined auction. The quality of the additional capacity is measured by its fitness factor. We observe that the single combined-auction model seems inferior to the mediator-based model and market becomes more capacity efficient in the latter. For instance, the revenue of the auctioneer always increases when mediators are involved, unlike the auctioneer based scenario where often there is a tradeoff between the revenue and the capacity. Further, the social value (i.e. efficiency) always increases when mediators are involved. Thus, our analysis indicates that there are significant opportunities for diversification in the internet economy and we should expect it to continue to develop richer structure, with room for different types of market entities and mechanisms to coexist.

[1]  Sébastien Lahaie,et al.  An analysis of alternative slot auction designs for sponsored search , 2006, EC '06.

[2]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[3]  Vwani P. Roychowdhury,et al.  Capacity Constraints and the Inevitability of Mediators in Adword Auctions , 2007, WINE.

[4]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Implementing Sponsored Search in Web Search Engines: Computational Evaluation of Alternative Mechanisms , 2007, INFORMS J. Comput..

[5]  Arpita Ghosh,et al.  Auctions with Revenue Guarantees for Sponsored Search , 2007, WINE.

[6]  A. Gunawardana,et al.  A Quality-Based Auction for Search Ad Markets with Aggregators , 2008 .

[7]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[8]  Andrew V. Goldberg,et al.  Competitiveness via consensus , 2003, SODA '03.

[9]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Revenue analysis of a family of ranking rules for keyword auctions , 2007, EC '07.

[10]  Itai Ashlagi,et al.  Mediators in position auctions , 2007, EC '07.

[11]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Position Auctions with Consumer Search , 2007 .

[12]  Tilman Börgers,et al.  Equilibrium Bids in Sponsored Search Auctions: Theory and Evidence , 2013 .

[13]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[14]  Andrew V. Goldberg,et al.  Collusion-resistant mechanisms for single-parameter agents , 2005, SODA '05.

[15]  E. Maasland,et al.  Auction Theory , 2021, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[16]  Ashish Goel,et al.  Truthful auctions for pricing search keywords , 2006, EC '06.

[17]  F. A. Hayek The American Economic Review , 2007 .