Prediction of Compressional Wave Velocity Using Regression and Neural Network Modeling and Estimation of Stress Orientation in Bokaro Coalfield, India

Velocity of compressional wave (VP) of coal and non-coal lithology is predicted from five wells from the Bokaro coalfield (CF), India. Shear sonic travel time logs are not recorded for all wells under the study area. Shear wave velocity (Vs) is available only for two wells: one from east and other from west Bokaro CF. The major lithologies of this CF are dominated by coal, shaly coal of Barakar formation. This paper focuses on the (a) relationship between Vp and Vs, (b) prediction of Vp using regression and neural network modeling and (c) estimation of maximum horizontal stress from image log. Coal characterizes with low acoustic impedance (AI) as compared to the overlying and underlying strata. The cross-plot between AI and Vp/Vs is able to identify coal, shaly coal, shale and sandstone from wells in Bokaro CF. The relationship between Vp and Vs is obtained with excellent goodness of fit (R2) ranging from 0.90 to 0.93. Linear multiple regression and multi-layered feed-forward neural network (MLFN) models are developed for prediction Vp from two wells using four input log parameters: gamma ray, resistivity, bulk density and neutron porosity. Regression model predicted Vp shows poor fit (from R2 = 0.28) to good fit (R2 = 0.79) with the observed velocity. MLFN model predicted Vp indicates satisfactory to good R2 values varying from 0.62 to 0.92 with the observed velocity. Maximum horizontal stress orientation from a well at west Bokaro CF is studied from Formation Micro-Imager (FMI) log. Breakouts and drilling-induced fractures (DIFs) are identified from the FMI log. Breakout length of 4.5 m is oriented towards N60°W whereas the orientation of DIFs for a cumulative length of 26.5 m is varying from N15°E to N35°E. The mean maximum horizontal stress in this CF is towards N28°E.

[1]  R. Hillis,et al.  Present-day stress orientation in Thailand's basins , 2010 .

[2]  S. Paul,et al.  Cleat Orientation from Ground Mapping and Image Log Studies for In Situ Stress Analysis: Coal Bed Methane Exploration in South Karanpura Coalfield, India , 2017 .

[3]  Stefan Bachu,et al.  In situ stress magnitude and orientation estimates for Cretaceous coal-bearing strata beneath the plains area of central and southern Alberta , 2003 .

[4]  J. Dayho Neural Network Architectures: an Introduction , 1990 .

[5]  S. Paul,et al.  Determination of in-situ stress direction from cleat orientation mapping for coal bed methane exploration in south-eastern part of Jharia coalfield, India , 2011 .

[6]  Judith E. Dayhoff,et al.  Neural Network Architectures: An Introduction , 1989 .

[7]  R. Chatterjee,et al.  Wellbore stability analysis and prediction of minimum mud weight for few wells in Krishna-Godavari Basin, India , 2017 .

[8]  Sayan Ghosh,et al.  Estimation of ash, moisture content and detection of coal lithofacies from well logs using regression and artificial neural network modelling , 2016 .

[9]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Porosity estimation from pre-stack seismic data in gas-hydrate bearing sediments, Krishna-Godavari basin, India , 2016 .

[10]  R. Hillis,et al.  In situ stresses of the West Tuna area, Gippsland Basin , 2005 .

[11]  B. Hardage,et al.  Interpretation of fractures and stress anisotropy in Marcellus Shale using multicomponent seismic data , 2014 .

[12]  Larry G. Mastin,et al.  Well bore breakouts and in situ stress , 1985 .

[13]  Daniel Moos,et al.  Utilization of observations of well bore failure to constrain the orientation and magnitude of crustal stresses: Application to continental, Deep Sea Drilling Project, and Ocean Drilling Program boreholes , 1990 .

[14]  R. Bates,et al.  Natural Fracture Characterization Using P-Wave Reflection Seismic Data, VSP, Borehole Imaging Logs, and the In-Situ Stress Field Determination , 1995 .

[15]  V. A. Mendhe,et al.  Evaluation of coal bed methane potential of coal seams of Sawang Colliery, Jharkhand, India , 2008 .

[16]  A. Gelman Analysis of variance: Why it is more important than ever? , 2005, math/0504499.

[17]  Bernt S. Aadnøy,et al.  Inversion Technique To Determine the In-Situ, Stress Field From Fracturing Data , 1988 .

[18]  E. Weeks Hydrologic properties of coal-beds in the Powder River Basin, Montana. II. Aquifer test analysis , 2005 .

[19]  S. Paul,et al.  Classification of coal seams for coal bed methane exploitation in central part of Jharia coalfield, India – A statistical approach , 2013 .

[20]  R. Morin Hydrologic properties of coal beds in the Powder River Basin, Montana I. Geophysical log analysis , 2005 .

[21]  Heloise B. Lynn,et al.  The winds of change , 2004 .

[22]  Richard F. Link,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Geological Data, Volume 2 , 1973 .

[23]  M. Zoback,et al.  Empirical relationships among seismic velocity, effective pressure, porosity, and clay content in sandstone , 1989 .

[24]  S. Mallick,et al.  Azimuthal anisotropy analysis of P-wave seismic data and estimation of the orientation of the in situ stress fields: An example from the Rock-Springs uplift, Wyoming, USA , 2017 .

[25]  M. Zoback,et al.  Empirical relations between rock strength and physical properties in sedimentary rocks , 2006 .

[26]  R. Hillis,et al.  Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province, Brunei , 2009 .

[27]  Zhaohui Huang,et al.  Fracture analysis and determination of in-situ stress direction from resistivity and acoustic image logs and core data in the Wenchuan Earthquake Fault Scientific Drilling Borehole-2 (50–1370 m) , 2013 .

[28]  R. Ulusay,et al.  Empirical Correlations for Predicting Strength Properties of Rocks from P-Wave Velocity Under Different Degrees of Saturation , 2013, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[29]  P. K. Pal,et al.  Estimation of stress magnitude and physical properties for coal seam of Rangamati area, Raniganj coalfield, India , 2010 .

[30]  S. Murthy,et al.  Palyno-petrographical facet and depositional account of Gondwana sediments from East Bokaro coalfield, Jharkhand , 2016, Journal of the Geological Society of India.

[31]  B. Müller,et al.  Borehole breakout and drilling-induced fracture analysis from image logs , 2008 .

[32]  Timothy Masters Signal and Image Processing with Neural Networks: A C++ Sourcebook , 1994 .

[33]  R. Chatterjee,et al.  Detection of overpressure zones and a statistical model for pore pressure estimation from well logs in the Krishna‐Godavari Basin, India , 2014 .

[34]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Pore pressure prediction in gas-hydrate bearing sediments of Krishna-Godavari basin, India , 2014 .

[35]  George S. Koch,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Geological Data , 1981 .

[36]  J. Castagna,et al.  Relationships between compressional‐wave and shear‐wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks , 1985 .

[37]  J. S. Bell,et al.  Petro Geoscience 1. IN SITU STRESSES IN SEDIMENTARY ROCKS (PART 1): MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES , 1996 .

[38]  Jorge Leonardo Martins,et al.  A well-log regression analysis for P-wave velocity prediction in the namorado oil field, Campos basin , 2009 .

[39]  S. Paul,et al.  Application of Cross-Plotting Techniques for Delineation of Coal and Non-Coal Litho-Units from Well Logs , 2012 .

[40]  J. S. Bell,et al.  Lecture: The Stress Regime of the Scotian Shelf Offshore Eastern Canada to 6 Kilometers Depth And Implications For Rock Mechanics And Hydrocarbon Migration , 1989 .

[41]  A. Nur,et al.  Effects of porosity and clay content on wave velocities in sandstones , 1986 .

[42]  Rima Chatterjee,et al.  Mapping of cleats and fractures as an indicator of in-situ stress orientation, Jharia coalfield, India , 2011 .

[43]  H. Lynn The winds of change Anisotropic rocks—their preferred direction of fluid flow and their associated seismic signatures—Part 1 , 2004 .

[44]  A. Varma,et al.  Methane Sorption dynamics and hydrocarbon generation of shale samples from West Bokaro and Raniganj basins, India , 2014 .

[45]  Bernt S. Aadnøy,et al.  Inversion technique to determine the in-situ stress field from fracturing data , 1990 .