Trends, similarities, and differences in the usage of teen and senior public online newsgroups

This article presents an analysis of the human to human interactions in two public online newsgroups, one targeting the young generation and the other the elderly. The main goal of this study was to establish a better understanding of similarities and differences in the ways of interacting among the participants of these two newsgroups. A series of analytical/statistical techniques, like Social Network Analysis (SNA), were used in order to get a better understanding of the online communities that have emerged around the participants of these two newsgroups. The SNA analysis showed that the teens newsgroup is more highly connected, has more messages sent and received and has a higher reciprocity. On the other hand, the senior newsgroup has more central dominant people who tend to make the rest of the network dependent on them for communication.

[1]  August E. Grant,et al.  Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging , 1990 .

[2]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  The Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1995 .

[3]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  `Making Moosic': The Development of Personal Relationships on Line and a Comparison to their Off-Line Counterparts , 1998 .

[4]  H. Rheingold.  A slice of life in my virtual community , 1993 .

[5]  Bolanle A. Olaniran,et al.  A model of group satisfaction in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face meetings , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Sara J. Czaja,et al.  Computer communication as an aid to independence for older adults , 1993, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[7]  J PerrinAndrew.  Review of "The content analysis guidebook" by Kimberly A. Neuendorf. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002 , 2002 .

[8]  R. Hanneman.  Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[9]  Andrew Laghos,et al.  Frameworks for Analyzing Computer-Mediated-Communication in e- Learning , 2005 .

[10]  Louis M. Gomez,et al.  A Cognitive Analysis of Database Query Production , 1986 .

[11]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Introduction to social network analysis , 2007, BCS HCI.

[12]  B. Wellman.  An electronic group is virtually a social network. , 1997 .

[13]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Network Analysis and Computer-Mediated Communication Systems , 1994 .

[14]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The impact of a computerized conferencing system on the productivity of scientific research communities , 1982 .

[15]  Barrett S. Caldwell,et al.  Social isolation and integration in electronic environments , 1993, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Volker Krebs,et al.  An introduction to social network analysis , 2004 .

[17]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[18]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The quality of online social relationships , 2002, CACM.

[19]  B. Wellman,et al.  Studying On-Line Social Networks , 1999 .

[20]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[21]  B. Wellman.  Living Networked in a Wired World , 1999 .

[22]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Empathic communities: reaching out across the Web , 1998, INTR.

[23]  J. Horrigan.  Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties , 2001 .

[24]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[25]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[26]  Barry Wellman.  Designing the Internet for a networked society , 2002, CACM.

[27]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[28]  Andrew Laghos,et al.  Distributed Construction through Participatory Design , 2005, Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology.

[29]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Computers, networks and work , 1995 .

[30]  Merry L. Eilers,et al.  Older adults and computer education: "Not to have the world a closed door." , 1989 .

[31]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.