Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), regular and small sized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in daily practice: European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) Survey.

OBJECTIVE A wide selection of both anterograde and retrograde mini-invasive procedures exist for stones' treatment. The 2016 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines still don't univocally define a best option. Our purpose is to give an overview on some European Stone Centers' customs and to compare real life clinical practice with statements of opinion leaders and Guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 2015 we performed a survey in 3 step about the spread of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques among EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) members. The 1st and 2nd steps dealt with the definition of EULIS urologist and department by collecting personal opinions about the endoscopic techniques. The third step was about clinical results. This paper presents data from the first two steps. RESULTS Ninety-one people answered. Out of them, 80% are European and 42% work in Centres fully dedicated to stone treatment. In particular, 50% of responders perform more than 80 RIRS/year, 25% more than 80 PCNL/year, 48% more than 100 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL)/year. RIRS is mainly used to treat stones < 2 cm both as primary treatment and after SWL failure. 73% don't perform routine pre-stenting and 66% ordinarily use a ureteral sheath. Hospital stay for RIRS is 24h for 70% of responders. Regular PCNL is performed by 87% of the responders, MiniPCNL by 58%, Ultra-MiniPCNL by 23% and MicroPCNL by 28%. Pneumatic balloon dilation is the favourite dilation technique (49%). 37% of responders perform PCNL always in the supine position, 21% always in the prone one. Almost all the responders agree about using Mini, Ultra-Mini and MicroPCNL for 1-2 cm stones. Approximately 50% also use MiniPCNL for stones > 2 cm. CONCLUSION our survey confirms the great heterogeneity existing in stones' treatment techniques in daily practice.

[1]  M. Desai,et al.  Factors predicting outcomes of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy: results from a large single‐centre experience , 2016, BJU international.

[2]  Sutchin R. Patel,et al.  The modern history and evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. , 2015, Journal of endourology.

[3]  J. J. de la Rosette,et al.  How well tolerated is supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy? , 2014, Current opinion in urology.

[4]  A. Breda,et al.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones larger than 2.5 cm , 2014, Current opinion in urology.

[5]  J. Desai,et al.  Ultra‐mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP): one more armamentarium , 2013, BJU international.

[6]  Liangren Liu,et al.  A comparison among four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, Urolithiasis.

[7]  O. Traxer,et al.  Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[8]  O. Traxer,et al.  Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[9]  Jean de la Rosette,et al.  Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[10]  M. Bader,et al.  The "all-seeing needle": initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. , 2011, European urology.

[11]  Liangren Liu,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients in the supine versus prone position. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[12]  G. Preminger,et al.  Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. , 2004, Journal of endourology.

[13]  J. W. Segura,et al.  Percutaneous removal of kidney stones. Preliminary report. , 1982, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[14]  R Günther,et al.  PERCUTANEOUS STONE MANIPULATION , 1981, The Journal of urology.

[15]  R. Autorino,et al.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, European urology.

[16]  Clinical research office of the endourological society. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[17]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy , 1998, World Journal of Urology.

[18]  G. Lemos,et al.  Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy , 2020 .

[19]  W. J. Bean,et al.  Percutaneous removal of kidney stones. , 1985, The Journal of the Florida Medical Association.

[20]  B. Johansson,et al.  Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. , 1976, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.