SAAS: Integrating Systems Analysis with Accounting and Strategy for Ex Ante Evaluation of IS Investments

For many companies, investment in information systems (IS) is one of the largest expenditures in the firm's capital budget. An important goal of ex ante investment evaluation of an information system is to reasonably determine the return on investment (ROI) of the proposed information system. However, past research has shown that business managers have significant concerns about the soundness of ex ante ROI evaluations of information systems. This relates to the fact that several benefits of an IS are intangible and nonfinancial. In addition, it has long been recognized that, unlike many other capital projects, IS projects exhibit significant contextual interaction. Further, different professionals such as accountants and Information Technology (IT) personnel often use different approaches to evaluate a potential information system. This study develops a framework and methodology that integrates and accommodates the different perspectives of IT personnel, accountants, and business managers. We propose a f...

[1]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Returns on Investments in Information Technology: A Research Synthesis , 2002, J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Jacques Verville,et al.  Acquiring Enterprise Software: Beating the Vendors at Their Own Game , 2000 .

[3]  James B. Edwards,et al.  ERP, Balanced Scorecard, and IT: How Do They Fit Together? , 2001 .

[4]  Robert A. Jones,et al.  Process mapping and scripting in the Accounting Information Systems (AIS) curriculum , 2001 .

[5]  Lee L. Gremillion,et al.  Justifying Decision Support and Office Automation Systems , 1985, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Assessing the usability of a user interface standard , 1991, CHI.

[7]  B. Santos.  Justifying investments in new information technologies , 1991 .

[8]  FRANK BANNISTER,et al.  Acts of faith: instinct, value and IT investment decisions , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Jack J. Phillips,et al.  ROI in the Public Sector: Myths and Realities , 2004 .

[10]  Sudha Ram,et al.  SEAM: A State-Entity-Activity-Model for a Well-Defined Workflow Development Methodology , 2002, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[11]  J. T. M. van Der Zee,et al.  Alignment Is Not Enough: Integrating Business and Information Technology Management with the Balanced Business Scorecard , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  Options Analysis of Software Platform Decisions: A Case Study , 2000, MIS Q..

[13]  Z. Irani,et al.  Integrating the costs of a manufacturing IT/IS infrastructure into the investment decision-making process , 1997 .

[14]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[15]  Hamid R. Parsaei,et al.  Economic and financial justification of advanced manufacturing technologies , 1992 .

[16]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Capital-Budgeting Systems and Capabilities Investments in U.S. Companies after the Second World War , 1994, Business History Review.

[17]  Frank F. Land,et al.  Matching an IT Project with an appropriate method of evaluation: a research note on ‘Evaluating Investments in IT’ , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Zahir Irani,et al.  The Propagation of Technology Management Taxonomies for Evaluating Investments in Information Systems , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Peter P. Chen.  The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data , 1975, VLDB '75.

[20]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative approaches to information systems evaluation , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Akhilesh Bajaj.  Large Scale Requirements Modeling: An Industry Analysis, a Model and a Teaching Case , 2006 .

[22]  Steven L. Alter,et al.  The Work System Method: Connecting People, Processes, and IT for Business Results , 2006 .

[23]  Marcia L. Weidenmier,et al.  Linking Business Processes and Transaction Cycles , 2004, J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Ravi S. Sharma,et al.  Evaluation measures for computer-based information systems , 1993 .

[25]  Didier P. Hostettler,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: a Necessary Good or an Unnecessary Evil , 1999 .

[26]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[27]  Joan A. Ballantine,et al.  Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[28]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Developing a frame of reference for ex-ante IT/IS investment evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  C. J. Wolfe,et al.  The effects of system design alternatives on the acquisition of tax knowledge from a computerized tax decision aid , 2000 .

[30]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[31]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[32]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Information technology and systems justification: A review for research and applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..