Metaphors in Conceptual Design

A metaphor allows us to understand one concept in terms of another, enriching our mental imagery and imbuing concepts with meaningful attributes. Metaphors are well studied in design, for example, in branding, communication and the design of computer interfaces. Less well appreciated is that our understanding of fundamental design concepts, including design itself, is metaphorical. When we treat design as a process of exploration or when we get together to “bounce ideas off each other” we understand the abstract concepts of design and ideas metaphorically; ideas don’t literally bounce, nor are we literally exploring when we design. Our research is a descriptive study of the metaphors employed in design. It is the first phase in a longer research effort to understand the impact of design metaphors on creativity. We investigated whether design authors employed different metaphors for the overall design process and consequently for core design concepts. To address this hypothesis we analyzed the language used in the concept generation chapters of nine widely used engineering design textbooks. We coded each metaphorical phrase, such as “finding another route to a solution”, and determined the core metaphors in use for common design concepts including, ideas, problems, solutions, concepts, design, the design process, user needs and others. We confirmed that authors with differing views of design do indeed emphasize different metaphors for core design concepts. We close by discussing the implications of some common metaphors, in particular that Ideas Are Physical Objects.© 2007 ASME

[1]  H. W. Rittel,et al.  Second-generation design methods , 1984 .

[2]  Hernan Casakin,et al.  Assessing the Use of Metaphors in the Design Process , 2006 .

[3]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Analogies and metaphors in creative design , 2008 .

[4]  J. Dixon,et al.  Engineering Design , 2019, Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering.

[5]  William A. Stubblefield.  Patterns of change in design metaphor: a case study , 1998, CHI.

[6]  Z. Kövecses,et al.  Metaphor: A Practical Introduction , 2002 .

[7]  John Chris Jones,et al.  Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures , 1981 .

[8]  Kim Halskov Madsen,et al.  Breakthrough by Breakdown: Metaphors and Structured Domains , 1988 .

[9]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[10]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[11]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[12]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[13]  J. Christopher Jones,et al.  Design methods: Seeds of human futures , 1970 .

[14]  Victoria Hoban,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner , 2013 .

[15]  Michael J. Reddy.  Metaphor and Thought: The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language , 1993 .

[16]  Raymond T. Grontkowski.  The Myth of Metaphor , 1962 .

[17]  Donald A. Schön.  Metaphor and Thought: Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy , 1993 .

[18]  Patrick Little,et al.  Engineering Design: A Project Based Introduction , 1999 .

[19]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Designing the world as your palette , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[20]  Kim Halskov,et al.  A guide to metaphorical design , 1994, CACM.

[21]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  The Conceptual Structure of Information Space , 2003, Designing Information Spaces.

[22]  C. Turbayne.  The Myth Of Metaphor , 1964 .

[23]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[24]  Laura Slack,et al.  Product Design , 2022, Lean Management.

[25]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[26]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  The conceptual structure of information space , 2003 .

[27]  W. P. Lewis,et al.  Fundamentals of Engineering Design , 1989 .

[28]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  An ethnographic perspective on engineering design , 1988 .

[29]  Ken Mohnkern,et al.  Beyond the interface metaphor , 1997, SGCH.

[30]  D. Gentner,et al.  Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity , 1982 .

[31]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Interface metaphors and user interface design , 1988 .

[32]  Don Koberg,et al.  The all new universal traveler : a soft-systems guide to creativity, problem-solving, and the process of reaching goals , 1981 .

[33]  L. Boroditsky.  Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors , 2000, Cognition.

[34]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[35]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[36]  Liane Gabora,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process , 2002, Creativity & Cognition.

[37]  三嶋 博之.  The theory of affordances , 2008 .