Flow quantitation by radio frequency analysis of contrast echocardiography

Contrast echocardiography has the potential for measuring cardiac output and regional blood flow. However, accurate quantitation is limited both by the use of non-standard contrast agents and by the electronic signal distortion inherent to the echocardiographic instruments. Thus, the aim of this study is to quantify flow by combining a stable contrast agent and a modified echo equipment, able to sample the radio frequency (RF) signal from a region of interest (ROI) in the echo image. The contrast agent SHU-454 (0.8 ml) was bolus injected into anin vitro calf vein, at 23 flow rates (ranging from 376 to 3620 ml/min) but constant volume and pressure. The ROI was placed in the centre of the vein, the RF signal was processed in real time and transferred to a personal computer to generate time-intensity curves. In the absence of recirculation, contrast washout slope and mean transit time (MTT) of curves (1.11–8.52 seconds) yielded excellent correlations with flow: r=0.93 and 0.95, respectively. To compare the accuracy of RF analysis with that of conventional image processing as to flow quantitation, conventional images were collected in the same flow model by two different scanners: a) the mechanical sector scanner used for RF analysis, and b) a conventional electronic sector scanner. These images were digitized off-line, mean videodensity inside an identical ROI was measured and time-intensity curves were built. MTT by RF was shorter than by videodensitometric analysis of the images generated by the same scanner (p<0.001). In contrast, MTT by RF was longer than by the conventional scanner (p<0.001). Significant differences in MTT were also found with changes in the gain setting controls of the conventional scanner. To study the stability of the contrast effect, 6 contrast injections (20 ml) were performed at a constant flow rate during recirculation: the spontaneous decay in RF signal intensity (t1/2=64±8 seconds) was too long to affect MTT significantly.In conclusion, the combination of a stable con trast agent and a modified echocardiographic instrument provides accurate quantitation of flow in anin vitro model; RF analysis is more accurate than conventional processing as to flow quantitation by contrast echocardiography.

[1]  O. L. Kwan,et al.  Superior intensity and reproducibility of SHU-454, a new right heart contrast agent. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  A. L'Abbate,et al.  Myocardial Tissue Recruitment in the Dog as Determined by Double Tracer Dilution Method , 1976, Circulation research.

[3]  M. S. Klein,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion in humans by contrast echocardiography. I. Evaluation of regional coronary reserve by peak contrast intensity. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  L S Wann,et al.  Intramyocardial variability in integrated backscatter: effects of coronary occlusion and reperfusion. , 1987, Circulation.

[5]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of myocardium. , 1985, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[6]  F J Ten Cate,et al.  Safety and efficacy of a new transpulmonary ultrasound contrast agent: initial multicenter clinical results. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  D D Watson,et al.  Assessment of Regional Myocardial Blood Flow with Myocardial Contrast Two-dimensional Echocardiography , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  D D Watson,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography in humans. II. Assessment of coronary blood flow reserve. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  J. Areeda,et al.  Physical factors influencing quantitation of two-dimensional contrast echo amplitudes. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  O. L. Kwan,et al.  In vivo correlation of thermodilution cardiac output and videodensitometric indicator-dilution curves obtained from contrast two-dimensional echocardiograms. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  S. Powsner,et al.  Contrast ultrasonography of the kidney: a new method for evaluation of renal perfusion in vivo. , 1987, Circulation.

[12]  L Landini,et al.  On-line two-dimensional evaluation of ultrasonic integrated backscatter. , 1987, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[13]  A. Distante,et al.  Myocardial Perfusion by Contrast Echocardiography: From Off‐Line Processing to Radio Frequency Analysis , 1991, Circulation.

[14]  E Picano,et al.  In vivo quantitative ultrasonic evaluation of myocardial fibrosis in humans. , 1990, Circulation.

[15]  G M Pohost,et al.  Contrast echocardiography in acute myocardial ischemia: I. In vivo determination of total left ventricular "area at risk". , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  O. L. Bastiaans,et al.  Videodensitometric processing of contrast two-dimensional echocardiographic data. , 1982, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  J. Elion,et al.  Left heart opacification with peripheral venous injection of a new saccharide echo contrast agent in dogs. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  T. Force,et al.  In vivo prediction of the transmural extent of experimental acute myocardial infarction using contrast echocardiography. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  S. Reisner,et al.  Contrast agents for myocardial perfusion studies , 1991 .

[20]  S. Kaul,et al.  Albunex: a safe and effective commercially produced agent for myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[21]  L. Landini,et al.  Computerized radio-frequency analysis of concentration and 'decay' of echo-contrast agents , 1988, Proceedings. Computers in Cardiology 1988.

[22]  S E Nissen,et al.  Contrast echo washout curves from the left ventricle: application of basic principles of indicator-dilution theory and calculation of ejection fraction. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  S. Powsner,et al.  Quantitative Radiofrequency Analysis of Sonicated Echo Contrast Agents , 1987 .

[24]  S. Powsner,et al.  Quantitation of echo-contrast effects. , 1986, American journal of physiologic imaging.