Hydraulic performance of grass swales for managing highway runoff.

The hydraulic performance of grass swales as a highway stormwater control measure was evaluated in a field-scale study adjacent to a Maryland highway. Two common swale design alternatives, pretreatment grass filter strips and vegetated check dams, were compared during 52 storm events over 4.5 years. Swale performance is described via three regimes, dependent on the relative size of the rainfall event. Overall, half of the events were small enough that the entire flow was stored, infiltrated, and evapotranspirated by the swales, resulting in no net swale discharge. Swales significantly reduced total volume and flow magnitudes generally during events with rainfall less than 3 cm. While the majority of improvement can be attributed to the swales, inclusion of check dams increases swale effectiveness. Pretreatment grass filter strips produced mixed effects. The swales demonstrated essentially no volumetric reduction during large storm events, functioning instead as conveyance, and smoothing fluctuations in flow.

[1]  Ana Deletic,et al.  Modelling of water and sediment transport over grassed areas , 2001 .

[2]  C. Cunnane Unbiased plotting positions — A review , 1978 .

[3]  M. Bäckström,et al.  Sediment transport in grassed swales during simulated runoff events. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Jan-Tai Kuo,et al.  Field Test of Grassed Swale Performance in Removing Runoff Pollution , 1999 .

[5]  Michael E Barrett,et al.  Performance Comparison of Structural Stormwater Best Management Practices , 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[6]  Ana Deletic,et al.  Performance of grass filters used for stormwater treatment—a field and modelling study , 2006 .

[7]  Vegetated Swales Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet , 1999 .

[8]  Thomas R. Gulledge,et al.  Probability plotting positions and goodness of fit for the normal distribution , 1985 .

[9]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Green‐ampt Infiltration Parameters from Soils Data , 1983 .

[10]  Allen P. Davis,et al.  Field Performance of Bioretention: Hydrology Impacts , 2008 .

[11]  Craig J. Allan,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION AND POLLUTANT LOADING ESTIMATION FOR HIGHWAY RUNOFF , 1998 .

[12]  Eric D. Stein,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices Using Dynamic Modeling , 2008 .

[13]  Betty T. Rushton Low Impact Parking Lot Design Reduces Runoff and Pollutant Loads , 1999 .

[14]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Streamflow distribution of non–point source nitrogen export from urban‐rural catchments in the Chesapeake Bay watershed , 2008 .

[15]  William F. Hunt,et al.  Mitigation of Impervious Surface Hydrology Using Bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland , 2009 .