Measuring risk-associated activity’s duration: A fuzzy set theory application

Uncertainty is inherent in the construction projects. Appropriately determining a project schedule under uncertainty is one of the most important factors for a contractor’s success in a project. However, when the likelihood of incurring risk events and the riskassociated consequences are uncertain, contractors often face difficulties in estimating project duration. While the Critical Path Method (CPM) has been widely used in scheduling a project, it has been frequently criticized because it assumes an activity’s duration deterministic without reflecting uncertainty involved in a project schedule. The Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) and the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) technique have been used to reinforce the shortcomings of the CPM through applying probabilistic analysis approach. They, however, still impose a problem of identifying probabilities under the circumstances where schedule variables cannot be defined as probabilistic nature. The main objective of this paper is to present an alternative schedule risk quantification method based on the fuzzy set theory for estimating a risk-associated activity’s duration. A hypothetical case study is prepared to show how the proposed method can be put into practice. Interviews with industry experts are also held to verify the usability as well as to identify the pros and cons of the method.

[1]  James J. O'Brien,et al.  Network scheduling variations for repetitive work , 1985 .

[2]  Arthur W. T. Leung,et al.  Site layout planning using nonstructural fuzzy decision support system , 2002 .

[3]  Aminah Robinson Fayek,et al.  Use of fuzzy logic for predicting design cost overruns on building projects , 2002 .

[4]  S. Chanas,et al.  THE USE OF FUZZY VARIABLES IN PERT , 1981 .

[5]  Kumar Neeraj Jha,et al.  Critical Factors Affecting Schedule Performance: Evidence from Indian Construction Projects , 2006 .

[6]  Van Uu Nguyen,et al.  Tender evaluation by fuzzy sets , 1985 .

[7]  T Chamberlain,et al.  THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY INSTITUTE , 1990 .

[8]  H. Zimmermann Fuzzy sets, decision making, and expert systems , 1987 .

[9]  Ali Jaafari Criticism of CPM for Project Planning Analysis , 1984 .

[10]  Hélène Fargier,et al.  Fuzzy PERT in series-parallel graphs , 2000, Ninth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. FUZZ- IEEE 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37063).

[11]  Brenda McCabe,et al.  Evaluating Risk in Construction–Schedule Model (ERIC–S): Construction Schedule Risk Model , 2003 .

[12]  Min-Yuan Cheng,et al.  OBJECT-ORIENTED EVOLUTIONARY FUZZY NEURAL INFERENCE SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[13]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Regional management of an aquifer for mining under fuzzy environmental objectives , 1983 .

[14]  Jong H. Ock,et al.  Pricing construction risk: fuzzy set application , 1993 .

[15]  Roman Slowinski,et al.  Fuzzy priority heuristics for project scheduling , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Didier Gourc,et al.  Where Do We Stand with Fuzzy Project Scheduling , 2004 .

[17]  Jacob Oluwoye,et al.  SIGNIFICANT FACTORS CAUSING DELAY AND COST OVERRUNS IN CONSTRUCTION OF GROUNDWATER PROJECTS IN GHANA , 2003 .

[18]  Malik Ranasinghe,et al.  Quantification and management of uncertainty in activity duration networks , 1994 .

[19]  James Bent,et al.  Effective Project Management Through Applied Cost and Schedule Control , 1996 .

[20]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..