Political and environmental equity issues related to municipal waste incineration siting

Abstract This analysis presents an overview of recent research concerning factors influencing community responses to municipal incinerators. These factors range from those about which experts and lay people may readily agree, such as the years of service remaining in an existing landfill, to issues that are more likely to engender disagreement, such as community perceptions of environmental risks, ‘environmental equity’, and other economic and political concerns. The implications of these factors as well as recommendations for decision makers facing municipal solid waste disposal issues are presented.

[1]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Improving Community Acceptance of Hazardous Waste Facilities Through Alternative Systems for Mitigating and Managing Risk , 1984 .

[2]  B. A. Williams,et al.  KNOWLEDGE VS. NIMBY: ASSESSING FLORIDA'S STRATEGY FOR SITING HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES , 1985 .

[3]  Ralph Nader,et al.  Menace of Atomic Energy , 1979 .

[4]  Y. Aharoni,et al.  No-risk society , 1981 .

[5]  Louis Blumberg,et al.  War on Waste: Can America Win Its Battle With Garbage? , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[6]  A. Myrick Freeman,et al.  The benefits of environmental improvement , 1979 .

[7]  Chris Zeiss,et al.  Waste Facility Impacts on Residential Property Values , 1989 .

[8]  Paul Mohai,et al.  Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards , 1992 .

[9]  Lawrence W. Barnthouse,et al.  Ecology, Impact Assessment, and Environmental Planning , 1986 .

[10]  R. Godsil Remedying Environmental Racism , 1991 .

[11]  A. E. Ladd The solid waste crisis and support for recycling: A research note , 1990 .

[12]  R. Hecky,et al.  Increases in Fish Mercury Levels in Lakes Flooded by the Churchill River Diversion, Northern Manitoba , 1984 .

[13]  Anthony E. Ladd Opposition to Solid Waste Incineration: Pre- Implementation Anxieties Surrounding a New Environmental Controversy* , 1991 .

[14]  L. Hamilton Who Cares about Water Pollution? Opinions in a Small‐Town Crisis* , 1985 .

[15]  Owen J. Furuseth,et al.  Community response to a municipal waste incinerator: NIMBY or neighbor? , 1991 .

[16]  Michael O'Hare,et al.  Facility siting and public opposition , 1983 .

[17]  A C Upton,et al.  The biological effects of low-level ionizing radiation. , 1982, Scientific American.

[18]  R. Warland,et al.  Differential Paths to Political Activism: Comparisons of Four Mobilization Processes After the Three Mile Island Accident , 1988 .

[19]  R. Bullard,et al.  Solid waste sites and the black Houston community. , 1983, Sociological inquiry.

[20]  R. C. Schwing,et al.  Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? , 1980 .

[21]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  How Close Is Close Enough: Public Perceptions of the Risks of Industrial Facilities , 1983 .

[22]  K. Bachrach,et al.  Coping with a community stressor: the threat of a hazardous waste facility. , 1985, Journal of health and social behavior.

[23]  Evan Vlachos,et al.  The dynamics of technical controversy , 1981 .

[24]  H. J. Otway,et al.  Revealed Preferences: Comments on the Starr Benefit-Risk Relationships , 1975 .

[25]  M. Douglas Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[26]  D. Mileti,et al.  Psychosocial Effects of Hazardous Toxic Waste Disposal in Communities. , 1990 .

[27]  William D. Robinson The Solid waste handbook : a practical guide , 1986 .

[28]  D. Morell,et al.  Siting and the Politics of Equity , 1984 .

[29]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[30]  D. Green,et al.  NIMBY or NIABY: a logit model of opposition to solid-waste-disposal facility siting , 1994 .

[31]  Stanley Rothman,et al.  Elite Ideology and Risk Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy , 1987, American Political Science Review.