How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? An analysis using a cell tensegrity model.

A eukaryotic cell attaches and spreads on substrates, whether it is the extracellular matrix naturally produced by the cell itself, or artificial materials, such as tissue-engineered scaffolds. Attachment and spreading require the cell to apply forces in the nN range to the substrate via adhesion sites, and these forces are balanced by the elastic response of the substrate. This mechanical interaction is one determinant of cell morphology and, ultimately, cell phenotype. In this paper we use a finite element model of a cell, with a tensegrity structure to model the cytoskeleton of actin filaments and microtubules, to explore the way cells sense the stiffness of the substrate and thereby adapt to it. To support the computational results, an analytical 1D model is developed for comparison. We find that (i) the tensegrity hypothesis of the cytoskeleton is sufficient to explain the matrix-elasticity sensing, (ii) cell sensitivity is not constant but has a bell-shaped distribution over the physiological matrix-elasticity range, and (iii) the position of the sensitivity peak over the matrix-elasticity range depends on the cytoskeletal structure and in particular on the F-actin organisation. Our model suggests that F-actin reorganisation observed in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in response to change of matrix elasticity is a structural-remodelling process that shifts the sensitivity peak towards the new value of matrix elasticity. This finding discloses a potential regulatory role of scaffold stiffness for cell differentiation.

[1]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[2]  J. Sanger,et al.  Analysis of myofibrillar structure and assembly using fluorescently labeled contractile proteins , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Eben Alsberg,et al.  FRET measurements of cell-traction forces and nano-scale clustering of adhesion ligands varied by substrate stiffness. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  D. Boal,et al.  Mechanics of the cell , 2001 .

[6]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  A mechanical model of actin stress fiber formation and substrate elasticity sensing in adherent cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Caterina Minelli,et al.  Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. , 2009, European cells & materials.

[8]  P. Janmey,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblast-collagen-matrix contraction: growth-factor signalling and mechanical loading. , 2000, Trends in cell biology.

[10]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Supplemental Data Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006 .

[11]  S. Safran,et al.  Theory of the mechanical response of focal adhesions to shear flow , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[12]  K. Fujiwara,et al.  Collagen modulates cell shape and cytoskeleton of embryonic corneal and fibroma fibroblasts: distribution of actin, alpha-actinin, and myosin. , 1982, Developmental biology.

[13]  D Stamenović,et al.  Contribution of intermediate filaments to cell stiffness, stiffening, and growth. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[14]  D. Weitz,et al.  Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks , 2004, Science.

[15]  C. Brangwynne,et al.  Mechanical Response of Cytoskeletal Networks , 2008 .

[16]  J. McGarry,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell. , 2004, European cells & materials.

[17]  E. Hay Interaction of embryonic surface and cytoskeleton with extracellular matrix. , 1982, The American journal of anatomy.

[18]  R. Kamm,et al.  On the Role of Continuum Models in Mechanobiology , 2000, Mechanics in Biology.

[19]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Matrix Strains Induced by Cells: Computing How Far Cells Can Feel , 2009, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[20]  F. Grinnell Fibroblast mechanics in three-dimensional collagen matrices. , 2008, Journal of bodywork and movement therapies.

[21]  D E Ingber,et al.  Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. , 1998, Current opinion in cell biology.

[22]  P. Janmey,et al.  Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Cells and Tissues Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials , 2005 .

[23]  R. Buxbaum,et al.  A thermodynamic model for force integration and microtubule assembly during axonal elongation. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  D Isabey,et al.  Stiffening response of a cellular tensegrity model. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  David J Odde,et al.  Traction Dynamics of Filopodia on Compliant Substrates , 2008, Science.

[27]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[28]  Shinji Deguchi,et al.  Flow-induced hardening of endothelial nucleus as an intracellular stress-bearing organelle. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  A. Evans,et al.  A model for the contractility of the cytoskeleton including the effects of stress-fibre formation and dissociation , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[30]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[31]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Direct mechanical measurement of geodesic structures in rat mesenchymal stem cells , 2007, HFSP journal.

[32]  E. Hay Interaction of embryonic cell surface and cytoskeleton with extracellular matrix , 1982 .

[33]  S T Quek,et al.  Mechanical models for living cells--a review. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  A. Bushnell,et al.  Immunofluorescent and ultrastructural studies of polygonal microfilament networks in respreading non-muscle cells. , 1979, Experimental cell research.

[35]  D. Discher,et al.  Optimal matrix rigidity for stress fiber polarization in stem cells. , 2010, Nature physics.

[36]  J. Tomasek,et al.  Mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix influence fibronectin fibril assembly in vitro. , 1995, Experimental cell research.

[37]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[38]  C Zhu,et al.  Cell mechanics: mechanical response, cell adhesion, and molecular deformation. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[39]  John A. Pedersen,et al.  Mechanobiology in the Third Dimension , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  D. Ingber Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[41]  Frederick Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[42]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Jcb: Article Introduction , 2002 .

[43]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell mechanosensitivity controls the anisotropy of focal adhesions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  A. Besser,et al.  Force-induced adsorption and anisotropic growth of focal adhesions. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[45]  P Montcourrier,et al.  Mechanical model of cytoskeleton structuration during cell adhesion and spreading. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  S. Suresh,et al.  Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials , 2003, Nature materials.

[47]  R. Burgkart,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[48]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[49]  D Stamenović,et al.  Invited review: engineering approaches to cytoskeletal mechanics. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.