Epidemiological investigations in regard to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) in Quebec, Canada. Part 1: biosecurity practices and their geographical distribution in two areas of different swine density.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a considerable threat to the swine industry and implementing biosecurity measures is essential for the control of its transmission. The aims of this study were: (1) to describe biosecurity practices in production sites located in a moderate density (MD) and a high density (HD) pig area according to production type; (2) to group sites in different patterns according to their biosecurity practices; and (3) to determine the geographical distribution of sites according to biosecurity patterns. Biosecurity practices were selected based on PRRS epidemiology. A questionnaire was completed on 125 breeding sites (MD=54; HD=71) and 120 growing (HD) sites, between 2005 and 2008. Depending on area and production type, the frequency of biosecurity practices used ranged from 0 to 2% for barrier at site entrance, 0 to 19% for use of shower, 25 to 35% for washing truck between loads of pigs, 51 to 57% for absence of rendering or rendering without access to the site, and 26 to 51% for absence of gilt purchase or purchase with quarantine. Better practices pertaining to entrance protocol (i.e. "no-entry" sign, shower, ≥24 h downtime) were reported more frequently on breeding sites in the MD than the HD area (P<0.05). In the HD area, growing sites had in general a lower level of biosecurity than breeding sites. Using a two-step clustering procedure performed separately for breeding and growing sites, two different patterns were obtained for each production type, which corresponded to a high and low level of biosecurity. For breeding sites, a higher biosecurity level was observed at sites located away from other pig sites, set at more than 300 m from the public road, having higher sow inventory, or being part of an integrated production (P<0.05). Spatial clusters of sites for each biosecurity pattern were detected. This study identified some shortcomings regarding biosecurity that should be addressed before implementing any PRRSV regional control. Vicinity of sites with different biosecurity levels also suggests difficulties in planning priorities of intervention based on geographical distribution of sites.

[1]  E. Albina,et al.  Results of a control programme for the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in the French 'Pays de la Loire' region. , 1997, Veterinary microbiology.

[2]  M. Hovi,et al.  Measuring and comparing constraints to improved biosecurity amongst GB farmers, veterinarians and the auxiliary industries. , 2008, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[3]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Categorical data analysis using the sas® system, 2nd edition , 2000 .

[4]  I. Gardner,et al.  Risk factors associated with seropositivity to porcine respiratory coronavirus in Danish swine herds , 1995, Preventive Veterinary Medicine.

[5]  S. Dee,et al.  Evaluation of the thermo-assisted drying and decontamination system for sanitation of a full-size transport vehicle contaminated with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus , 2007 .

[6]  E. Eggenberger,et al.  Risk factors for the reinfection of specific pathogen-free pig breeding herds with enzootic pneumonia , 1992, Veterinary Record.

[7]  P. Eckersall,et al.  Maternal undernutrition and the ovine acute phase response to vaccination , 2008, BMC veterinary research.

[8]  G. Medley,et al.  Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in GB pig herds: farm characteristics associated with heterogeneity in seroprevalence , 2008, BMC veterinary research.

[9]  P. T. Lyashenko Methods of Disease Control in the Novoaleksandrovsk Region. , 1940 .

[10]  D. Pfeiffer,et al.  Multivariate analysis of management and biosecurity practices in smallholder pig farms in Madagascar , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[11]  S. Mortensen,et al.  Risk factors for infection of sow herds with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[12]  M. Torremorell,et al.  Establishment of a herd negative for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) from PRRSV-positive sources , 2002 .

[13]  L. Garber,et al.  Evaluation of risk factors for the spread of low pathogenicity H7N2 avian influenza virus among commercial poultry farms. , 2005, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[14]  Colin D. Johnson,et al.  Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome on swine production in the United States. , 2005, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[15]  S. Dee,et al.  Evaluation of 4 intervention strategies to prevent the mechanical transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. , 2004, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[16]  Satoshi Otake,et al.  An experimental model to evaluate the role of transport vehicles as a source of transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus to susceptible pigs. , 2004, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[17]  S. Dee,et al.  Studies on the carriage and transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by individual houseflies (Musca domestica) , 2004, Veterinary Record.

[18]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis Using The SAS1 System , 1995 .

[19]  S. Dee,et al.  Evidence of long distance airborne transport of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae , 2009, Veterinary research.

[20]  J. Traub-Dargatz,et al.  An introduction to biosecurity of cattle operations. , 2002, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[21]  N. Rose,et al.  Occurrence of respiratory disease outbreaks in fattening pigs: relation with the features of a densely and a sparsely populated pig area in France. , 2002, Veterinary research.

[22]  Satoshi Otake,et al.  Mechanical transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus throughout a coordinated sequence of events during cold weather. , 2002, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[23]  Ann Lindberg,et al.  Disease awareness, information retrieval and change in biosecurity routines among pig farmers in association with the first PRRS outbreak in Sweden. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[24]  Paul A. Gore,et al.  11 – Cluster Analysis , 2000 .

[25]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[26]  D. Cole,et al.  Human Contacts and Potential Pathways of Disease Introduction on Georgia Poultry Farms , 2009, Avian diseases.

[27]  A. Kruif,et al.  A survey on biosecurity and management practices in Belgian pig herds. , 2008, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[28]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Studies of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus infection in avian species. , 1997, Veterinary microbiology.

[29]  G. Medley,et al.  A stochastic mathematical model of the within-herd transmission dynamics of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV): fade-out and persistence. , 2010, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[30]  S. Dee,et al.  Transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by fomites (boots and coveralls) , 2002 .

[31]  J. Stegeman,et al.  Factors associated with the introduction of classical swine fever virus into pig herds in the central area of the 1997/98 epidemic in the Netherlands , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[32]  P. Mason,et al.  Procedures for preventing transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus (O/TAW/97) by people. , 2004, Veterinary microbiology.

[33]  A. de Kruif,et al.  Type and frequency of contacts between Belgian pig herds. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[34]  T E Carpenter,et al.  Direct and indirect contact rates among beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds in three California counties, with reference to control of potential foot-and-mouth disease transmission. , 2001, American journal of veterinary research.

[35]  S. Dee,et al.  Further assessment of fomites and personnel as vehicles for the mechanical transport and transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. , 2009, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[36]  R Wurtz,et al.  Handwashing machines, handwashing compliance, and potential for cross-contamination. , 1994, American journal of infection control.

[37]  W. Christianson,et al.  Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome : A review , 2003 .

[38]  Sandra F. Amass,et al.  Biosecurity considerations for pork production units , 1999 .

[39]  C. Corzo,et al.  Long-distance airborne transport of infectious PRRSV and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae from a swine population infected with multiple viral variants. , 2010, Veterinary microbiology.

[40]  Edwin W. Moss,et al.  Animal Welfare and Meat Science , 2000 .

[41]  S. Mortensen,et al.  Biosecurity in 121 Danish sow herds. , 2004, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[42]  K. Rossow Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome , 1998, Veterinary pathology.

[43]  Yao Wang,et al.  A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment , 2001, KDD '01.

[44]  R. Morrison,et al.  Effect on total pigs weaned of herd closure for elimination of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus , 2007 .

[45]  M. Lambert Épidémiologie du syndrome reproducteur et respiratoire porcin dans deux régions de densités porcines différentes au Québec , 2012 .

[46]  A. Tibary,et al.  Biosecurity and biocontainment in alpaca operations☆ , 2005, Small Ruminant Research.