Calcified plaque: measurement of area at thin-section flat-panel CT and 64-section multidetector CT and comparison with histopathologic findings.

The purpose of this study was to assess the blooming artifacts in ex vivo coronary arteries at multidetector computed tomography (CT) and flat-panel-volume CT by comparing measured areas of calcified plaque with respect to the reference standard of histopathologic findings. Three ex vivo hearts were scanned with multidetector CT and flat-panel-volume CT after institutional review board approval. The area of calcified plaque was measured at histopathologic examination, multidetector CT, and flat-panel-volume CT. The plaque area was overestimated at multidetector CT by 400% (4.61/1.15) on average, and the predicted difference between the measurements was significant (3.46 mm(2), P = .018). The average overestimation of plaque area at flat-panel-volume CT was twofold (214% [2.18/1.02]), and the predicted difference was smaller (1.16 mm(2), P = .08). The extent of the blooming artifact in visualizing calcified coronary plaque is reduced by using flat-panel-volume CT.

[1]  Jonathan G Goldin,et al.  Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiolog , 2006, Circulation.

[2]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control , 2006, European Radiology.

[4]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Atherosclerotic plaque at the carotid bifurcation: CT angiographic appearance with histopathologic correlation. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Evidence for lower variability of coronary artery calcium mineral mass measurements by multi-detector computed tomography in a community-based cohort--consequences for progression studies. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[6]  J. Lima,et al.  Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by multidetector row computed tomography angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  G. Simonetti,et al.  Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. , 2004, European heart journal.

[8]  Michael Grasruck,et al.  Ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization , 2006, European Radiology.

[9]  E Falk,et al.  Effects of temperature and histopathologic preparation on the size and morphology of atherosclerotic carotid arteries as imaged by MRI , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  P. Stein,et al.  Multidetector computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. , 2006, The American journal of medicine.

[11]  M. Kalra,et al.  Effect of Contrast Concentration, Tube Potential and Reconstruction Kernels on MDCT Evaluation of Coronary Stents: an in Vitro Study , 2007, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[12]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Ex vivo coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization with multi-detector-row CT , 2003, European Radiology.

[13]  W. Frishman,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography , 2006 .

[14]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Coronary artery calcification: effect of size of field of view on multi-detector row CT measurements. , 2004, Radiology.

[16]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Michael Poon,et al.  Technology Insight: cardiac CT angiography , 2006, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[19]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Predictive Value of 16-Slice Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography to Detect Significant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Artery Disease: Patient- Versus Segment-Based Analysis , 2004, Circulation.

[20]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Noninvasive Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses with Multislice Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  M. Reiser,et al.  Multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic lesions in human ex vivo coronary arteries. , 2004, Atherosclerosis.

[22]  Jonathan G Goldin,et al.  Calcium begets calcium: progression of coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic subjects. , 2002, Radiology.

[23]  Stephen Schroeder,et al.  Reliability of Differentiating Human Coronary Plaque Morphology Using Contrast-Enhanced Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography: A Comparison With Histology , 2004, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[24]  C D Claussen,et al.  Non-invasive evaluation of atherosclerosis with contrast enhanced 16 slice spiral computed tomography: results of ex vivo investigations , 2004, Heart.