The calibrated sigma method: An efficient remedy for between-group differences in response category use on Likert scales

[1]  B. Weijters,et al.  Methodological Issues in Cross-Linguistic and Multilingual Advertising Research , 2017 .

[2]  M. Pandelaere,et al.  The ‘I’ in extreme responding , 2016 .

[3]  M. Geuens,et al.  Scale format effects on response option interpretation and use , 2016 .

[4]  Y. V. Vaerenbergh,et al.  Examining the relationship between language divergence and word-of-mouth intentions , 2014 .

[5]  Bert Weijters,et al.  The Effect of Familiarity with the Response Category Labels on Item Response to Likert Scales , 2013 .

[6]  F. Martínez-López,et al.  Structural equation modelling in marketing and business research , 2013 .

[7]  Stefano Puntoni,et al.  The Anchor Contraction Effect in International Marketing Research , 2011 .

[8]  B. Weijters,et al.  The effect of rating scale format on response styles: the number of response categories and response catgory labels , 2010 .

[9]  Patrick J.F. Groenen,et al.  Identifying Response Styles: A Latent-Class Bilinear Multinomial Logit Model , 2010 .

[10]  J. Krosnick,et al.  National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality , 2009 .

[11]  Stanley A. Mulaik,et al.  Linear Causal Modeling with Structural Equations , 2009 .

[12]  Jonas Holmqvist,et al.  Perceived importance of native language use in service encounters , 2009 .

[13]  C. Chiu,et al.  Motivated response styles: the role of cultural values, regulatory focus, and self-consciousness in socially desirable responding. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Robert D. Tortora,et al.  Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet , 2009 .

[15]  Prashanth U. Nyer,et al.  The effect of public commitment on resistance to persuasion: The influence of attitude certainty, issue importance, susceptibility to normative influence, preference for consistency and source proximity , 2009 .

[16]  Bert Weijters,et al.  Assessing response styles across modes of data collection , 2008 .

[17]  C. Moorman,et al.  Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines , 2008 .

[18]  Jean-Paul Fox,et al.  Using Item Response Theory to Measure Extreme Response Style in Marketing Research: A Global Investigation , 2008 .

[19]  Anne-Wil Harzing.  Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research , 2006 .

[20]  Alvaro J. Arce-Ferrer.  An Investigation Into the Factors Influencing Extreme-Response Style , 2006 .

[21]  Scott Fricker,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys , 2005 .

[22]  B. Duffy,et al.  Comparing Data from Online and Face-to-face Surveys , 2005 .

[23]  R. Fischer,et al.  Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias , 2004 .

[24]  Gerald Albaum,et al.  A Comparison of Response Characteristics from Web and Telephone Surveys , 2004 .

[25]  J. Wicherts,et al.  A Cautionary Note on the Use of Information Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Modeling With Means , 2004 .

[26]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated Closed Mindedness and the Emergence of Culture , 2003 .

[27]  Irvine Clarke,et al.  Extreme response style in cross‐cultural research , 2001 .

[28]  Hans Baumgartner,et al.  Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation , 2001 .

[29]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[30]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Overcoming Scale Usage Heterogeneity , 2001 .

[31]  S. Skevington,et al.  Designing response scales for cross-cultural use in health care: data from the development of the UK WHOQOL. , 1999, The British journal of medical psychology.

[32]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[33]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay-saying: comment on Neuberg et al.'s (1997) critique of the need for closure scale. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  H W Marsh,et al.  Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  E. Greenleaf,et al.  MEASURING EXTREME RESPONSE STYLE , 1992 .

[38]  E. Greenleaf.  Improving Rating Scale Measures by Detecting and Correcting Bias Components in Some Response Styles , 1992 .

[39]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence , 1989 .

[40]  Alfred C. Marcus,et al.  Response Styles in Telephone and Household Interviewing: A Field Experiment , 1980 .

[41]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Response biases in crosscultural measurement , 2015 .

[42]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[43]  Niels Bosma,et al.  Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2009 Executive Report. , 2010 .

[44]  Leo Sleuwaegen,et al.  De contextuele determinanten van het ondernemerschap in Vlaanderen , 2010 .

[45]  Gert Jan Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations - Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival (3. ed.) , 2010 .

[46]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  Methods for assessing and calibrating response scales across countries and languages , 2005 .

[47]  T. Little.  Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues. , 1997, Multivariate behavioral research.

[48]  S. Saxena,et al.  An Approach to Response Scale Development for Cross-Cultural Questionnaires , 1997 .

[49]  Scott Shane,et al.  Cultural influences on national rates of innovation , 1993 .