Who wants to know? The effect of audience on identity expression among minority group members.

Statements of social identification among ethnic minority members were examined as a function of group membership of the participants, group membership of the audience, and personal identifiability. In Study 1, Turkish migrants and Iranian refugees in the Netherlands expressed their identification with native and host groups as a function of the audience implicit in the language of the questionnaire (native, host). Turks stressed identification both with native and with the host group more to the host audience, whereas Iranians did not. Both groups, but particularly the Turks, emphasized the adaptation problems and associated stress, to the host culture and to the host audience. In Study 2, identification with native and host group was examined among Portuguese migrants in the Netherlands, as a function of audience (native, host) and personal identifiability (anonymous, identifiable). Degree of identification with native and host groups depended both on the audience and on personal identifiability. Results from both studies are explained primarily in terms of strategic self-presentation of identities, determined by the relation between the group and the audience. In general, participants address identity claims to audiences that might question these claims (or are in a position to redress grievances), although because of reality constraints, this is easier when anonymous.

[1]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[2]  K. Douglas,et al.  Identifiability and self-presentation: computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[3]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer? , 1996 .

[4]  M. Verkuyten.  Discourses of ethnic minority identity , 1997 .

[5]  John W. Berry,et al.  Psychology of acculturation: Understanding individuals moving between cultures. , 1990 .

[6]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[7]  B. R. Schlenker.  Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[8]  C. Kosmitzki.  The Reaffirmation of Cultural Identity in Cross-Cultural Encounters , 1996 .

[9]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe , 1995 .

[10]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[11]  J. Gerton,et al.  Psychological impact of biculturalism: evidence and theory. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  N. Hutnik.  Ethnic Minority Identity: A Social Psychological Perspective , 1992 .

[13]  O. Klein,et al.  The strategic confirmation of meta-stereotypes: how group members attempt to tailor an out-group's representation of themselves. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[14]  S. Reicher,et al.  Adolescence and Delinquency: The Collective Management of Reputation , 1995 .

[15]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Intergroup differentiation in Social Context: Identity needs versus Audience constraints , 2000 .

[16]  M. Bal.  The effects of language , 1989 .

[17]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization , 1986 .

[18]  C. Leach,et al.  Is racism dead? Comparing (expressive) means and (structural equation) models. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[19]  Robert Stalnaker.  Context And Content , 1999 .

[20]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content , 1999 .

[21]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. , 1990 .

[22]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  The (Il)legitimacy of ingroup bias - From social reality to social resistance , 2001 .

[23]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[24]  B. Buunk,et al.  Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants , 1998 .

[25]  R. Baumeister.  A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[26]  S. Reicher,et al.  More on deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: Three studies on the effects of visibility to the in‐group , 1998 .

[27]  J. Phinney.  Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: review of research. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  R. Brislin.  Applied cross-cultural psychology. , 1990 .

[29]  Mark Levine,et al.  On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. , 1994 .

[30]  E.,et al.  Self-Discrepancy : A Theory Relating Self and Affect , 2022 .

[31]  H. Triandis,et al.  Ethnic Affirmation Versus Social Desirability , 1983 .

[32]  K. Deaux,et al.  Negotiating Social Identity , 1998 .

[33]  J. Crocker,et al.  Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. , 1989 .

[34]  M. Bond,et al.  Experimenter language choice and ethnic affirmation by Chinese trilinguals in Hong Kong , 1984 .

[35]  David A. Ralston,et al.  Cultural Accommodation , 1995 .

[36]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[37]  Matthew J. Hornsey,et al.  Assimilation and Diversity: An Integrative Model of Subgroup Relations , 2000 .

[38]  James A. Davis,et al.  Research Methods in Social Relations , 1952 .

[39]  G. Breakwell.  Coping With Threatened Identities , 1986 .

[40]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  You Can’t Always Do What You Want: Social Identity and Self-Presentational Determinants of the Choice to Work for a Low-Status Group , 2000 .

[41]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Telling what they want to know: participants tailor causal attributions to researchers' interests , 1999 .

[42]  A. Dijker.  Emotional reactions to ethnic minorities , 1987 .

[43]  Mark Levine,et al.  Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out‐group , 1994 .

[44]  N. Ellemers.  The Influence of Socio-structural Variables on Identity Management Strategies , 1993 .

[45]  Jan Pieter van Oudenhoven,et al.  Integration and assimilation of Moroccan immigrants in Israel and the Netherlands , 1998 .

[46]  N. Ellemers,et al.  The Impact of Respect Versus Neglect of Self-Identities on Identification and Group Loyalty , 2002 .

[47]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[48]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  John T. Jost,et al.  The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations , 2001 .

[50]  D. Trafimow,et al.  The Effects of Language and Priming on the Relative Accessibility of the Private Self and the Collective Self , 1997 .

[51]  P. Nicassio.  The Psychosocial Adjustment of the Southeast Asian Refugee , 1985 .

[52]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The Distinctiveness Effect in Social Categorization: You Are What Makes You Unusual , 1995 .

[53]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing reality and its alternatives: an inclusion/ exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment , 1992 .

[54]  R. Spears,et al.  Panacea or Panopticon? , 1994 .

[55]  M. Bond,et al.  Ethnic Affirmation by Chinese Bilinguals , 1980 .

[56]  J. Lucassen,et al.  Newcomers: Immigrants and Their Descendants in the Netherlands 1550-1995 , 1998 .

[57]  C. Stangor,et al.  Prejudice : the target's perspective , 1999 .

[58]  N. Branscombe,et al.  Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The context and content of social identity threat , 1999 .

[60]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Commitment and strategic responses to social context. , 1999 .