Scale of body pattern adjusts to available cell number in amphibian embryos

In many embryos, the removal of cells whose descendants would normally have formed entire parts of the body pattern Is followed by apparently normal morphogenesis, which implies an ordered readjustment of the activities of the remaining cells before their potentialities become restricted. Special cell lineages cannot underly the generation and regulation of pattern in such embryos1,2. It is proposed instead that there must be some regulatory communication system in the developing embryo that normally ensures an appropriate spatial pattern of differentiation but which is also able to adjust to the removal, addition or transposition of material at a sufficiently early stage3–6. Precise models for such a mechanism have recently been suggested6–10, and have been tested experimentally10–14. I have performed surgical manipulations at pre-gastrula embryonic stages in two distantly related amphibian types, Xenopus and Ambystoma, and report here an assessment of the regulation achieved in terms of pattern proportions. The results are problematical for most current theories of pattern control.

[1]  P. Weiss Perspectives in the Field of Morphogenesis , 1950, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[2]  J. Cooke,et al.  Control of somite number during morphogenesis of a vertebrate, Xenopus laevis , 1975, Nature.

[3]  B. Goodwin,et al.  A phase-shift model for the spatial and temporal organization of developing systems. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  D. Summerbell,et al.  Positional signalling and specification of digits in chick limb morphogenesis , 1975, Nature.

[5]  R. Keller,et al.  Vital dye mapping of the gastrula and neurula of Xenopus laevis: I. Prospective areas and morphogenetic movements of the superficial layer , 1976 .

[6]  L. Wolpert Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  J. Slack,et al.  Determination and cellular commitment in the embryonic amphibian mesoderm , 1980, Nature.

[8]  S. Papageorgiou A morphogen gradient model for pattern regulation. I. Formation of non-repetitive and repetitive structures. , 1980, Biophysical chemistry.

[9]  K. Wildenthal Protein Breakdown inhibited by Insulin to improve Heart Culture , 1972, Nature.

[10]  H. Meinhardt Models for the ontogenetic development of higher organisms. , 1978, Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology.

[11]  A Gierer,et al.  Generation and regeneration of sequence of structures during morphogenesis. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  A. Sibatani A bifurcation model for developmental processes. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  Hans Driesch The Science And Philosophy Of The Organism , 1908 .

[14]  C. Waddington Regulation of Amphibian Gastrulae with Added Ectoderm , 1938 .

[15]  L Wolpert,et al.  Positional signalling along hydra. , 1972, Nature: New biology.

[16]  D. SUMMERBELL,et al.  Precision of Development in Chick Limb Morphogenesis , 1973, Nature.