Price negotiation in differentiated products markets: Evidence from the Canadian mortgage market

This paper measures market power in a decentralized market where contracts are determined through a search and negotiation process. The mortgage industry has many institutional features which suggest competitiveness: homogeneous contracts, negotiable rates, and, for a given consumer, common lending costs across lenders. As a result, even with a small number of lenders, informed borrowers can gather multiple quotes. However, there is important heterogeneity in the ability of consumers to understand the subtleties of financial contracts, in their ability or willingness to search and negotiate for quotes, and also in their degree of loyalty to their main financial institution. We propose and estimate a model to disentangle the different channels through which market power can arise for a given transaction in this environment. There are two main sources of market power. The first is search frictions. We find that over the five year period of the contract the average search cost corresponds to an upfront sunk cost of between $1,047 and $1,590. The second main source of market power is switching costs. We estimate that consumers are willing to pay between $759 and $1,617 upfront to avoid having to switch banks.

[1]  R. Town,et al.  Competition in Networks: An Analysis of Hospital Pricing Behavior , 1999 .

[2]  Matthew Grennan Price Discrimination and Bargaining: Empirical Evidence from Medical Devices , 2012 .

[3]  Mark Armstrong,et al.  Exploding Offers and Buy-Now Discounts , 2011 .

[4]  Leemore S. Dafny,et al.  Are Health Insurance Markets Competitive? , 2008, The American economic review.

[5]  M. Satterthwaite,et al.  Competition and Market Power in Option Demand Markets , 2001, The Rand journal of economics.

[6]  Gregory S. Crawford,et al.  The Welfare Effects of Bundling in Multichannel Television Markets , 2012 .

[7]  Susan E. Woodward,et al.  Diagnosing Consumer Confusion and Sub-Optimal Shopping Effort: Theory and Mortgage-Market Evidence , 2010 .

[8]  Ali Hortacsu,et al.  Testing Models of Consumer Search using Data on Web Browsing and Purchasing Behavior , 2009 .

[9]  A. Wolinsky True Monopolistic Competition as a Result of Imperfect Information , 1986 .

[10]  Luke M. Froeb,et al.  Mergers, Cartels, Set-Asides, and Bidding Preferences in Asymmetric Oral Auctions , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[11]  Steven Berry,et al.  Differentiated Products Demand Systems from a Combination of Micro and Macro Data: The New Car Market , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  M. S. Goeree,et al.  LIMITED INFORMATION AND ADVERTISING IN THE U.S. PERSONAL COMPUTER INDUSTRY , 2008 .

[13]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption , 1984 .

[14]  Alan T. Sorensen Equilibrium Price Dispersion in Retail Markets for Prescription Drugs , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  Jason Allen,et al.  Discounting in Mortgage Markets , 2011 .

[16]  Boundedly Rational Bargaining in Option Demand Markets: An Empirical Application , 2007 .

[17]  H. Bester Bargaining versus price competition in markets with quality uncertainty , 1993 .

[18]  Demographic Preferences and Price Discrimination in New Vehicle Sales∗ , 2009 .

[19]  Han Hong,et al.  Using price distributions to estimate search costs , 2006 .

[20]  W. Hanemann Discrete-Continuous Models of Consumer Demand , 1984 .

[21]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Product Differentiation, Search Costs, and Competition in the Mutual Fund Industry: A Case Study of S&P 500 Index Funds , 2003 .

[22]  Fabien Postel-Vinay,et al.  Equilibrium Wage Dispersion with Worker and Employer Heterogeneity , 2002 .