Delay and capacity in energy efficient sensor networks

MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks employ periodic switching to low energy sleep state in order to enhance network lifetime. During the sleep state, the sensors do not perform energy consuming operations such as receiving and transmitting packets. During the normal state, CSMA based multi-access mechanism is the MAC protocol of choice in distributed, unsynchronized sensor networks. The energy conserving mechanism has a two-fold effect on delay in the network. On one hand it increases delay since many a times the intended receiver may be in sleep state and the transmitter has to delay the transmission to allow the receiver to wake up. On the other hand, since the sensors do not transmit in sleep state, the contention for channel is reduced which tends to improve delay. In this paper we present a queuing theoretic analysis of delay and capacity in sensor networks with uncoordinated sleep mechanism and characterize the energy-delay-capacity tradeoffs. We consider several sleep states which consume different levels of energy. We model sensor networks as queuing networks and evaluate closed form expressions for average packet delay and maximum achievable per-node throughput in terms of network parameters and sleep schedule. Comparisons with the performance of networks that do not employ any energy conserving mechanisms show that any of the energy conserving sleep states in the networks considered in this paper leads to considerable degradation in delay and capacity of the network.

[1]  Elif Uysal-Biyikoglu,et al.  Energy-efficient transmission over a wireless link via lazy packet scheduling , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[2]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  Active query forwarding in sensor networks , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[3]  Patrick Thiran,et al.  Latency of wireless sensor networks with uncoordinated power saving mechanisms , 2004, MobiHoc '04.

[4]  Sanjay Shakkottai,et al.  Asymptotics of query strategies over a sensor network , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[5]  David E. Culler,et al.  Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks , 2004, SenSys '04.

[6]  Tarek F. Abdelzaher,et al.  Towards optimal sleep scheduling in sensor networks for rare-event detection , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[7]  Elif Uysal-Biyikoglu,et al.  Energy-efficient scheduling of packet transmissions over wireless networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[8]  Gunter Bolch,et al.  Queueing Networks and Markov Chains , 2005 .

[9]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Delay efficient sleep scheduling in wireless sensor networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[10]  Sergio D. Servetto,et al.  Constrained random walks on random graphs: routing algorithms for large scale wireless sensor networks , 2002, WSNA '02.

[11]  Alexandre Proutiere,et al.  Evaluating delay and energy in sensor networks with sporadic and correlated traffic , 2007 .

[12]  Alvise Bonivento,et al.  Adaptive sleep discipline for energy conservation and robustness in dense sensor networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[13]  Hong Shen,et al.  RandomWalk Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005, Sixth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing Applications and Technologies (PDCAT'05).

[14]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  The power of choice in random walks: an empirical study , 2006, MSWiM '06.

[15]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[16]  M. Balakrishnan,et al.  Impact of sleep in a wireless sensor MAC protocol , 2004, IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004.

[17]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  The impact of data aggregation in wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops.

[18]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[19]  Marco Zuniga,et al.  Using Heterogeneity to Enhance Random Walk-based Queries , 2009, J. Signal Process. Syst..

[20]  Anantha Chandrakasan,et al.  Dynamic Power Management in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2001, IEEE Des. Test Comput..

[21]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  An adaptive energy-efficient and low-latency MAC for data gathering in wireless sensor networks , 2004, 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2004. Proceedings..

[22]  Viktor K. Prasanna,et al.  Energy-latency tradeoffs for data gathering in wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[23]  B. Krishnamachari,et al.  Active Query Forwarding in Sensor Networks ( ACQUIRE ) , 2002 .

[24]  Suresh Singh,et al.  PAMAS—power aware multi-access protocol with signalling for ad hoc networks , 1998, CCRV.

[25]  Alhussein A. Abouzeid,et al.  Queuing network models for delay analysis of multihop wireless ad hoc networks , 2006, IWCMC '06.

[26]  József Balogh,et al.  On k−coverage in a mostly sleeping sensor network , 2008, Wirel. Networks.

[27]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Energy conserving routing in wireless ad-hoc networks , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[28]  S. M. Heemstra de Groot,et al.  Power-aware routing in mobile ad hoc networks , 1998, MobiCom '98.