Postoperative Oral Antibiotics and Sinonasal Outcomes following Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Tumors (POET) Study: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics are commonly used in pituitary surgery, but evidence supporting their use is lacking, which has implications for antibiotic stewardship. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether receipt of postoperative oral antibiotics results in superior sinonasal quality of life (QOL) compared with placebo among patients who undergo endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. METHODS Patients were randomized to receive either oral placebo or cefdinir (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in patients intolerant to cefdinir) for 7 d after surgery. They were monitored for 12 wk. The primary outcome measure was sinonasal QOL at 2 wk on the Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12. Supplementary end points included sinonasal QOL reported on the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 and objective endoscopy scores to assess nasal healing according to the Lund-Kennedy method. RESULTS A total of 461 patients were screened, 131 were randomized, and 113 (placebo arm: 55; antibiotic arm: 58) were analyzed. There was no clinically meaningful or statistically significant difference in sinonasal QOL at any measured time point (P ≥ .24) using either instrument. Nasal cavity endoscopy scores were not significantly different at 1 to 2 wk after surgery (P = .25) or at 3 to 4 wk after surgery (P = .08). CONCLUSION Postoperative prophylactic oral antibiotics did not result in superior sinonasal QOL compared with placebo among patients who underwent standard endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.

[1]  W. Abuzeid,et al.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in anterior skull‐base surgery: a survey of the North American Skull Base Society , 2019, International forum of allergy & rhinology.

[2]  C. Snyderman,et al.  Perioperative management in endoscopic endonasal skull‐base surgery: a survey of the North American Skull Base Society , 2018, International forum of allergy & rhinology.

[3]  A. Little,et al.  The Minimally Clinically Important Difference of The Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12 , 2017, Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base.

[4]  Kathryn L. Jelinek,et al.  Comparison of sinonasal quality of life and health status in patients undergoing microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary lesions: a prospective cohort study. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  Kathryn L. Jelinek,et al.  Predictors of sinonasal quality of life and nasal morbidity after fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  R. Carrau,et al.  Prospective validation of a patient-reported nasal quality-of-life tool for endonasal skull base surgery: The Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  T. Schwartz,et al.  A prospective study of postoperative symptoms in sinonasal quality‐of‐life following endoscopic skull‐base surgery: dissociations based on specific symptoms , 2013, International forum of allergy & rhinology.

[8]  J. Mullol,et al.  Impairment of olfaction and mucociliary clearance after expanded endonasal approach using vascularized septal flap reconstruction for skull base tumors. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[9]  P. Erwin,et al.  Prophylactic Perioperative Antibiotic Use in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[10]  P. Gardner,et al.  Nasal morbidity following endoscopic skull base surgery: A prospective cohort study , 2011, Head & neck.

[11]  A. Little,et al.  Short-duration, single-agent antibiotic prophylaxis for meningitis in trans-sphenoidal surgery , 2011, Pituitary.

[12]  M. Bergsneider,et al.  Evolution of sinonasal symptoms following endoscopic anterior skull base surgery. , 2010, Skull base : official journal of North American Skull Base Society ... [et al.].

[13]  S. Albu,et al.  Prophylactic Antibiotics in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Short Follow-Up Study , 2010, American journal of rhinology & allergy.

[14]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  P. Gardner,et al.  Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery. , 2009, Skull base : official journal of North American Skull Base Society ... [et al.].

[17]  V. Lund,et al.  Psychometric validity of the 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test , 2009, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[18]  R. Chandra,et al.  Prophylactic i.v. Antibiotics in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Trends and Attitudes of the American Rhinologic Society Membership , 2009, American journal of rhinology & allergy.

[19]  A. Perneczky,et al.  Surgical complications after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery , 2009, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Su,et al.  Postoperative Antibiotic Care after Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery , 2008, American journal of rhinology.

[21]  Christina Wang,et al.  Endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas and other sellar lesions: an assessment of efficacy, safety, and patient impressions. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  Paolo Cappabianca,et al.  Surgical complications associated with the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[23]  M. Jorissen,et al.  Short term effects of antibiotics (Zinnat) after endoscopic sinus surgery. , 2000, Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica Belgica.

[24]  D. Kennedy,et al.  Staging for Rhinosinusitis , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.