Competitive Interactions of Attentional Resources in Early Visual Cortex during Sustained Visuospatial Attention within or between Visual Hemifields: Evidence for the Different-hemifield Advantage

Performing a task across the left and right visual hemifields results in better performance than in a within-hemifield version of the task, termed the different-hemifield advantage. Although recent studies used transient stimuli that were presented with long ISIs, here we used a continuous objective electrophysiological (EEG) measure of competitive interactions for attentional processing resources in early visual cortex, the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP). We frequency-tagged locations in each visual quadrant and at central fixation by flickering light-emitting diodes (LEDs) at different frequencies to elicit distinguishable SSVEPs. Stimuli were presented for several seconds, and participants were cued to attend to two LEDs either in one (Within) or distributed across left and right visual hemifields (Across). In addition, we introduced two reference measures: one for suppressive interactions between the peripheral LEDs by using a task at fixation where attention was withdrawn from the periphery and another estimating the upper bound of SSVEP amplitude by cueing participants to attend to only one of the peripheral LEDs. We found significantly greater SSVEP amplitude modulations in Across compared with Within hemifield conditions. No differences were found between SSVEP amplitudes elicited by the peripheral LEDs when participants attended to the centrally located LEDs compared with when peripheral LEDs had to be ignored in Across and Within trials. Attending to only one LED elicited the same SSVEP amplitude as Across conditions. Although behavioral data displayed a more complex pattern, SSVEP amplitudes were well in line with the predictions of the different-hemifield advantage account during sustained visuospatial attention.

[1]  Mark M Schira,et al.  Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  Jenna G. Kelly,et al.  Bilateral attentional advantage on elementary visual tasks , 2009, Vision Research.

[3]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Visuo-spatial neural response interactions in early cortical processing during a simple reaction time task: a high-density electrical mapping study , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Cheuk Yee Pang,et al.  Competitive interactions in somatosensory cortex for concurrent vibrotactile stimulation between and within hands , 2015, Biological Psychology.

[5]  Satoshi Shioiri,et al.  Asymmetrical brain activity induced by voluntary spatial attention depends on the visual hemifield: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[6]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Tutis Vilis,et al.  fMRI reveals greater within‐ than between‐hemifield integration in the human lateral occipital cortex , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[11]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Regan.  Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[13]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Expansion of MT Neurons Excitatory Receptive Fields during Covert Attentive Tracking , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[15]  S. Pollmann,et al.  Interhemispheric resource sharing: Decreasing benefits with increasing processing efficiency , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  J. Liederman,et al.  Developmental changes in hemispheric independence. , 1985, Child development.

[17]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Visual attention as a multilevel selection process , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  L. Kehrer.  Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[19]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Bilateral field advantage in visual crowding , 2009, Vision Research.

[20]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  S. Brandt,et al.  Hemifield effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  S. Kastner,et al.  Stimulus similarity modulates competitive interactions in human visual cortex. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[24]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Visual attention capacity parameters covary with hemifield alignment , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Tracking the allocation of attention in visual scenes with steady-state evoked potentials , 2011 .

[26]  Rufin VanRullen,et al.  Bullet trains and steam engines: exogenous attention zips but endogenous attention chugs along. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[27]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Bilateral Field Advantage in Visual Enumeration , 2011, PLoS ONE.

[28]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  The selective tuning model of attention: psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item , 2003, Vision Research.

[29]  W. Brown,et al.  Bilateral field interactions, hemispheric specialization and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission time , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Mieke Donk,et al.  Detection Performance in Pop-Out Tasks: Nonmonotonic Changes with Display Size and Eccentricity , 2002, Perception.

[32]  S. Pollmann,et al.  The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[34]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  A Belger,et al.  Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[36]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Keeping focused: Sustained spatial selective visual attention is maintained in healthy old age , 2012, Brain Research.

[37]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[38]  S Plainis,et al.  Raised Visual Detection Thresholds Depend on the Level of Complexity of Cognitive Foveal Loading , 2001, Perception.

[39]  R. Marois,et al.  Capacity limits of information processing in the brain , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients , 1989, Nature.

[41]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  S. Brandt,et al.  What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared , 2007, Brain Research.

[43]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[44]  Malcolm A. Jeeves,et al.  Bilateral visual field processing and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission time , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Spatial neglect and attention networks. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[46]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Blind separation and blind deconvolution: an information-theoretic approach , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[48]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Attentional interference at small spatial separations , 1999, Vision Research.

[49]  S. Shipp.  Interhemispheric integration in visual search , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  H. Pashler,et al.  Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[51]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Sustained Splits of Attention within versus across Visual Hemifields Produce Distinct Spatial Gain Profiles , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[53]  A. Belger,et al.  Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  Suzanne E. Welcome,et al.  How dynamic is interhemispheric interaction? Effects of task switching on the across-hemisphere advantage , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[55]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[56]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[57]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraint on theories of attention , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  M. Banich.  The Missing Link: The Role of Interhemispheric Interaction in Attentional Processing , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[59]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[60]  A. Friedman,et al.  Multiple resources in divided attention: a cross-modal test of the independence of hemispheric resources. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady‐state visual evoked potential , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[62]  J. Duhamel,et al.  The Spatial and Temporal Deployment of Voluntary Attention across the Visual Field , 2009, PloS one.

[63]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Modeling Visual Attention via Selective Tuning , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[64]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  The center-surround profile of the focus of attention arises from recurrent processing in visual cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[65]  S. Andersen,et al.  Effects of overt and covert attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[66]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[67]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Attentional bias of competitive interactions in neuronal networks of early visual processing in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[68]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[69]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[70]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[71]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[72]  T. Ludwig,et al.  Hemispheric interactions: The Bilateral Advantage and Task Difficulty , 1992, Cortex.

[73]  S. Palmer,et al.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[74]  L. Kehrer.  Perceptual segregation and retinal position. , 1987, Spatial vision.

[75]  L. Kehrer,et al.  A central performance drop with luminance stimuli requiring spatial integration , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Attending to orientation results in an inhibitory surround in orientation space , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[77]  R. Dolan,et al.  Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.