GMRF Estimation under Topological and Spectral Constraints

We investigate the problem of Gaussian Markov random field selection under a non-analytic constraint: the estimated models must be compatible with a fast inference algorithm, namely the Gaussian belief propagation algorithm. To address this question, we introduce the *-IPS framework, based on iterative proportional scaling, which incrementally selects candidate links in a greedy manner. Besides its intrinsic sparsity-inducing ability, this algorithm is flexible enough to incorporate various spectral constraints, like e.g. walk summability, and topological constraints, like short loops avoidance. Experimental tests on various datasets, including traffic data from San Francisco Bay Area, indicate that this approach can deliver, with reasonable computational cost, a broad range of efficient inference models, which are not accessible through penalization with traditional sparsity-inducing norms.

[1]  E. Seneta Non-negative Matrices and Markov Chains , 2008 .

[2]  Ali Jalali,et al.  On Learning Discrete Graphical Models using Greedy Methods , 2011, NIPS.

[3]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[4]  Xihong Lin,et al.  VARIABLE SELECTION AND ESTIMATION WITH THE SEAMLESS-L0 PENALTY , 2011 .

[5]  Rob Malouf,et al.  A Comparison of Algorithms for Maximum Entropy Parameter Estimation , 2002, CoNLL.

[6]  J. Darroch,et al.  Generalized Iterative Scaling for Log-Linear Models , 1972 .

[7]  Fabien Moutarde,et al.  Spatial and temporal analysis of traffic states on large scale networks , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[8]  Danny Bickson,et al.  Gaussian Belief Propagation: Theory and Aplication , 2008, 0811.2518.

[9]  William T. Freeman,et al.  Correctness of Belief Propagation in Gaussian Graphical Models of Arbitrary Topology , 1999, Neural Computation.

[10]  A. Hasman,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference , 1991 .

[11]  C. N. Liu,et al.  Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[13]  Katya Scheinberg,et al.  Learning Sparse Gaussian Markov Networks Using a Greedy Coordinate Ascent Approach , 2010, ECML/PKDD.

[14]  Dmitry M. Malioutov,et al.  Walk-Sums and Belief Propagation in Gaussian Graphical Models , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  Alexandre d'Aspremont,et al.  Model Selection Through Sparse Max Likelihood Estimation Model Selection Through Sparse Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Multivariate Gaussian or Binary Data , 2022 .

[16]  Xihong Lin,et al.  Variable selection and estimation with the seamless-L0 penalty models , 2012 .

[17]  Paul H. Siegel,et al.  Gaussian belief propagation based multiuser detection , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[18]  T. Speed,et al.  Gaussian Markov Distributions over Finite Graphs , 1986 .

[19]  大西 仁,et al.  Pearl, J. (1988, second printing 1991). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan-Kaufmann. , 1994 .

[20]  Pradeep Ravikumar,et al.  Sparse inverse covariance matrix estimation using quadratic approximation , 2011, MLSLP.

[21]  Peter A. Flach,et al.  Evaluation Measures for Multi-class Subgroup Discovery , 2009, ECML/PKDD.

[22]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Chapter 2 – BAYESIAN INFERENCE , 1988 .

[23]  Bin Dong,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for ℓ0 Minimization in Wavelet Frame Based Image Restoration , 2013, J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties , 2001 .