Randomized, Open‐Label Phase II Study Comparing Capecitabine‐Cisplatin Every 3 Weeks with S‐1‐Cisplatin Every 5 Weeks in Chemotherapy‐Naïve Patients with HER2‐Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer: OGSG1105, HERBIS‐4A Trial

Abstract Lessons Learned. Evidence has suggested that capecitabine‐cisplatin is similar or possibly superior to S‐1‐cisplatin in terms of safety and efficacy for Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). As far as we are aware, our study is the first randomized trial of two regimens consisting of an oral fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin in human epidermal growth receptor 2‐negative AGC patients with measurable lesions. Background. We performed a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine plus cisplatin in comparison with S‐1 plus cisplatin for first‐line treatment of human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)‐negative advanced gastric cancer in Japan. Methods. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days plus cisplatin at 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (n = 43) or S‐1 at 40–60 mg twice daily for 21 days plus cisplatin at 60 mg/m2 on day 8 every 5 weeks (n = 41). The primary endpoint of the study was response rate. Results. Response rate did not differ significantly between the capecitabine‐cisplatin and S‐1‐cisplatin groups (53.5% vs. 51.2%, respectively, p > .999). S‐1‐cisplatin tended to confer a better progression‐free survival (PFS; median of 5.9 vs. 4.1 months, p = .284), overall survival (OS; median of 13.5 vs. 10.0 months, p = .290), and time to treatment failure (TTF; median of 4.5 vs. 3.1 months, p = .052) compared with capecitabine‐cisplatin. Common hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included anemia and neutropenia in both groups. However, anorexia, fatigue, and hyponatremia of grade 3 or 4 occurred more frequently in the capecitabine‐cisplatin group. Conclusion. Capecitabine‐cisplatin failed to demonstrate superior efficacy compared with S‐1‐cisplatin. The higher incidence of severe adverse events with capecitabine‐cisplatin suggests that S‐1‐cisplatin should remain the standard first‐line chemotherapy for HER2‐negative advanced gastric cancer in Japan.

[1]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[2]  M. V. van Oijen,et al.  The efficacy and safety of S-1-based regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, Gastric Cancer.

[3]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[4]  Galina Kurteva,et al.  Capecitabine and cisplatin with or without cetuximab for patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (EXPAND): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  K. Matsuo,et al.  A retrospective comparison of S-1 plus cisplatin and capecitabine plus cisplatin for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer , 2013, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  T. Choueiri,et al.  Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer treated with Cisplatin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  E. Baba,et al.  Efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus cisplatin in Japanese patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: subset analyses of the AVAGAST study and the ToGA study , 2012, Gastric Cancer.

[8]  M. Shah,et al.  Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Yoon-Koo Kang,et al.  Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[10]  Yoon-Koo Kang,et al.  Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  Masahiro Takeuchi,et al.  S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  A. Norman,et al.  Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  J. Ajani,et al.  Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  H. Ishitsuka,et al.  Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[15]  M. Fukushima,et al.  Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. , 1996, Anti-cancer drugs.