The effects of adopting the Balanced Scorecard on shareholder returns

Abstract Many firms have adopted the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a way to implement strategy and measure firm performance. This paper uses a long-horizon event study methodology to examine the relationship between BSC adoption and shareholder returns. Using a matched pair design, we show that firms who adopt the BSC significantly outperform firms that do not adopt the BSC over a three year period beginning with the year of adoption. Our results are robust for different matching criteria. There is also evidence that firms earn greater excess returns after adoption of the BSC than before. These results provide strong evidence that the BSC is an effective strategic management tool that leads to improved shareholder returns.

[1]  R. Banker,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of an Incentive Plan that Includes Nonfinancial Performance Measures , 2000 .

[2]  E. Fama,et al.  Industry costs of equity , 1997 .

[3]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  Linking Balanced Scorecard Measures to Size and Market Factors: Impact on Organizational Performance , 2000 .

[4]  Taylor Randall,et al.  Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms , 2003 .

[5]  William M. Cready.  Information Value and Investor Wealth: The Case of Earnings Announcements , 1988 .

[6]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[7]  Tom Kennedy,et al.  The Impact of Activity‐Based Costing Techniques on Firm Performance , 2001 .

[8]  D. Larcker,et al.  Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications , 1998 .

[9]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[10]  Michael R. Kinney,et al.  Further Evidence on the Extent and Origins of JIT's Profitability Effects , 2002 .

[11]  R. Anthony,et al.  Management Control Systems , 2020, Management Control Systems and Tools for Internationalization Success.

[12]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Sophisticated capital budgeting selection techniques and firm performance , 1985 .

[13]  B. Lev,et al.  Value-Relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Wireless Communications Industry , 1996 .

[14]  Thomas L. Albright,et al.  An investigation of the effect of Balanced Scorecard implementation on financial performance , 2004 .

[15]  G. Easton,et al.  The Effects of Total Quality Management on Corporate Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 1998 .

[16]  Hassan R. HassabElnaby,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Performance Consequences of Nonfinancial Measures , 2003 .

[17]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II , 2001 .

[18]  Gerald K. Debusk,et al.  Does the Balanced Scorecard Improve Performance? Much of the Evidence Available to Gauge the Success of the Balanced Scorecard Has Been Anecdotal. A Recent Survey of IMA Members Provides Numbers. Do They Reach a Final Verdict? You Be the Judge , 2006 .

[19]  D. Larcker,et al.  Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction , 1998 .

[20]  James J. Cordeiro,et al.  Do EVA ™ Adopters Outperform their Industry Peers? Evidence from Security Analyst Earnings Forecasts , 2001 .