Imaging of the optic disk in caring for patients with glaucoma: ophthalmoscopy and photography remain the gold standard.

Optic disk imaging is integral to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with glaucoma. We discuss the various forms of imaging the optic nerve, including ophthalmoscopy, photography, and newer imaging modalities, including optical coherence tomography (OCT), confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (HRT), and scanning laser polarimetry (GDx), specifically highlighting their benefits and disadvantages. We argue that ophthalmoscopy and photography remain the gold standard of imaging due to portability, ease of interpretation, and the presence of a large database of images for comparison.

[1]  G. Mcgwin,et al.  Agreement in Assessing Cup-to-Disc Ratio Measurement Among Stereoscopic Optic Nerve Head Photographs, HRT II, and Stratus OCT , 2006, Journal of glaucoma.

[2]  A Meyenberg,et al.  Morphometric assessment of normal, suspect and glaucomatous optic discs with Stratus OCT and HRT II , 2006, Eye.

[3]  K. Schulman,et al.  Resource use and costs of branch and central retinal vein occlusion in the elderly , 2010, Current medical research and opinion.

[4]  J. Caprioli,et al.  Optic disk and nerve fiber layer imaging to detect glaucoma. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  P. Lichter,et al.  The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[6]  R. Susanna,et al.  Comparison of Quantitative Imaging Devices and Subjective Optic Nerve Head Assessment by General Ophthalmologists to Differentiate Normal From Glaucomatous Eyes , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[7]  A. Coleman,et al.  Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  C. Cheung,et al.  Optic disc measurements in myopia with optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  J. Crowston,et al.  Optic disk size and glaucoma. , 2007, Survey of ophthalmology.

[10]  J. Caprioli,et al.  Measurement of optic disc size and rim area with spectral-domain OCT and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  R. Harper,et al.  The sensitivity and specificity of direct ophthalmoscopic optic disc assessment in screening for glaucoma: a multivariate analysis , 2000, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[12]  Greg Gamble,et al.  Agreement between stereoscopic photographs, clinical assessment, Heidelberg retina tomograph and digital stereoscopic optic disc camera in estimating verticalcup:disc ratio , 2005, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[13]  A Sommer,et al.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Detection of Glaucomatous Progression of the Optic Disc , 1996, Journal of glaucoma.

[14]  C. Leung,et al.  Optic disc imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: variability and agreement study with Heidelberg retinal tomograph. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[15]  J. Moreno-Montañés,et al.  Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Values Using Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-III , 2009, Journal of glaucoma.