Mobilizing Community Energy

What explains the galvanising of communities to participate actively in energy projects? How do groups mobilize to overcome the often formidable barriers highlighted in the existing literature? Drawing on original qualitative research of 100 community energy groups in Scotland, including six in-depth case studies, we explain how effective mobilization occurs and the political dynamics surrounding such mobilization. To capture these dynamics, we adapt theories offered by literature on social movements, with a particular focus on resource mobilization theories. Applying our adapted framework, we identify two particular sets of resources shaping community energy mobilization: (i) structural resources, which refer to the broad political context structuring and constraining opportunities for community energy mobilization; and (ii) symbolic resources—less tangible resources used to galvanise participants. We investigate to what extent our case study groups were able to draw upon and exploit these resources. We find that structural resources can either facilitate or hinder mobilization; what matters is how state resources are exploited and constraints mitigated. The use of symbolic resources was highly effective in aiding mobilization. Each of the groups examined – despite their considerable variation – effectively exploited symbolic resources such as shared identity or desire for strong, self reliant communities.

[1]  Gill Seyfang,et al.  Community action for sustainable housing: Building a low-carbon future , 2010 .

[2]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy , 2010 .

[3]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK , 2007, Global Environmental Politics.

[4]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use? , 2008 .

[5]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Carbon reduction at community scale , 2010 .

[6]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Social enterprise and renewable energy: emerging initiatives and communities of practice , 2008 .

[7]  T. Skocpol,et al.  The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry , 1980, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[8]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Dynamic Incentives of Environmental Regulations: The Effects of Alternative Policy Instruments on Te , 1995 .

[9]  Bradley D. Parrish,et al.  Building capacity for low-carbon communities: The role of grassroots initiatives , 2010 .

[10]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Good Neighbours, Public Relations and Bribes: The Politics and Perceptions of Community Benefit Provision in Renewable Energy Development in the UK , 2010 .

[11]  M. Dekay,et al.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Emerging in between: The multi-level governance of renewable energy in the English regions , 2007 .

[13]  C. Calhoun Social theory and the politics of identity , 1994 .

[14]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[15]  Sarah Mander,et al.  The Role of Discourse Coalitions in Planning for Renewable Energy: A Case Study of Wind-Energy Deployment , 2008 .

[16]  E. Bomberg Mind the (Mobilization) Gap: Comparing Climate Activism in the United States and European Union , 2012 .

[17]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[18]  Hanspeter Kriesi,et al.  Political Context and Opportunity , 2007 .

[19]  Jacquelien van Stekelenburg,et al.  The social psychology of protest , 1997 .

[20]  Private Sector Governance for a Sustainable Economy: A Strategic Approach , 2011 .

[21]  M. Diani,et al.  Social Movements: An Introduction , 1998 .

[22]  David Toke,et al.  Explaining wind power planning outcomes:: some findings from a study in England and Wales , 2005 .

[23]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change , 2010 .

[24]  Carsten Anckar,et al.  On the Applicability of the Most Similar Systems Design and the Most Different Systems Design in Comparative Research , 2008 .

[25]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Chapter 24 Common-pool resources and institutions: Toward a revised theory , 2002 .

[26]  Tim Jackson Motivating Sustainable Consumption , 2008 .

[27]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Community renewable energy: What should it mean , 2008 .

[29]  S. Burch In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: An examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities , 2010 .

[30]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? , 2008 .

[31]  R. Dalton,et al.  The Green Rainbow: Environmental Groups in Western Europe , 1994 .

[32]  Dillon Platero Let's Do It Ourselves! , 1970, The School Review.

[33]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Re-powering Scotland: Wind Farms and the ‘Energy or Environment?’ Debate , 2009 .

[34]  Rocio A. Diaz-Chavez,et al.  Community-based renewable energy in the Lake District National Park – local drivers, enablers, barriers and solutions , 2012 .

[35]  E. Amenta,et al.  The Political Consequences of Social Movements , 2010 .

[36]  T. Gurr,et al.  Why Men Rebel. , 1970 .

[37]  M. Büchs,et al.  Low-carbon practices: a third sector research agenda , 2011 .

[38]  G. Walker Decentralised systems and fuel poverty: Are there any links or risks? ☆ , 2008 .

[39]  Anthony Oberschall,et al.  Social Movements , 2017 .

[40]  J. Zuboy,et al.  Nontechnical Barriers to Solar Energy Use: Review of Recent Literature , 2006 .

[41]  Ian Convery,et al.  Social impacts of community renewable energy projects: findings from a woodfuel case study , 2012 .

[42]  A. Walder Political Sociology and Social Movements , 2009 .