Measuring while moving (humanitarian supply chain performance measurement – status of research and current practice)

Purpose – Raising standards are leading humanitarians to become increasingly interested in measuring the performance of their supply chain. A few researchers have addressed this topic, building on classical measurement theories and trying to identify the salient features of the humanitarian sector. This young body of literature must now be tested against current practice. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The practitioners’ perspective is explored through a multiple case study, based on qualitative evidence, within three major humanitarian organizations. Results are discussed using a situation-actor-process – learning-action-performance model of inquiry. Preceding this investigation, a literature review delves into research on humanitarian supply chain performance measurement and presents the most relevant pieces in a general framework. Findings – Humanitarians have elaborated measures whose essential focus is laid on service level. The more comprehensive approach advoc...

[1]  Kate Hughes,et al.  Humanitarian logistics metrics : where we are and how we might improve , 2011 .

[2]  Gordon Stewart,et al.  Supply‐chain operations reference model (SCOR): the first cross‐industry framework for integrated supply‐chain management , 1997 .

[3]  Sabine F. Schulz,et al.  Logistics performance management in action within a humanitarian organization , 2009 .

[4]  D. Whetten.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[5]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[6]  Dong-Young Kim.  Relationship between supply chain integration and performance , 2013 .

[7]  P. Larson,et al.  Not‐for‐profit supply chains in interrupted environments , 2009 .

[8]  R. Kent,et al.  International humanitarian crises: two decades before and two decades beyond , 2004 .

[9]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[10]  P. Walker,et al.  Fit for purpose: the role of modern professionalism in evolving the humanitarian endeavour , 2011, International Review of the Red Cross.

[11]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation methods , 1981 .

[12]  Sander de Leeuw,et al.  Towards a Reference Mission Map for Performance Measurement in Humanitarian Supply Chains , 2010, PRO-VE.

[13]  G. Kovács,et al.  Responding to Disruptions in the Supply Network – From Dormant to Action , 2009 .

[14]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains , 2008 .

[15]  R. Oloruntoba,et al.  Humanitarian aid : an agile supply chain? , 2006 .

[16]  E. A. van der Laan,et al.  Performance measurement in humanitarian supply chains , 2009 .

[17]  Arshinder,et al.  Supply chain coordination issues: an SAP‐LAP framework , 2007 .

[18]  Parikshit Charan,et al.  Supply chain performance issues in an automobile company: a SAP‐LAP analysis , 2012 .

[19]  R. Yin.  The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers , 1981 .

[20]  Lijo John,et al.  Humanitarian supply chain management in India: a SAP‐LAP framework , 2012 .

[21]  Hau L. Lee.  The triple-A supply chain. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[22]  Sushil.  SAP‐LAP models of inquiry , 2000 .

[23]  P. S. Scott,et al.  Le)agility in humanitarian aid (NGO) supply chains , 2010 .

[24]  Tun Lin Moe,et al.  Balanced scorecard for natural disaster management projects , 2007 .

[25]  Wilhelm Dangelmaier,et al.  A humanitarian supply chain process reference model , 2009, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[26]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[27]  S. Sofaer.  Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? , 1999, Health services research.

[28]  Mike Kennerley,et al.  Managing through measures: a study of impact on performance , 2005 .

[29]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  Measuring supply chain performance , 1999 .