Spatial and temporal variations of aerosols around Beijing in summer 2006: 2. Local and column aerosol optical properties

[1] Model calculations were conducted using the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF-chem) for the region around Beijing, China, in the summer of 2006, when the CAREBeijing-2006 intensive campaign was conducted. In this paper, we interpret aerosol optical properties in terms of aerosol mass concentrations and their chemical compositions by linking model calculations with measurements. The model calculations generally captured the observed variability of various surface and column aerosol optical parameters in and around Beijing. At the surface, the spatial and temporal variations of aerosol absorption and scattering coefficients corresponded well to those of elemental carbon and sulfate mass concentrations, respectively, and were controlled by local-scale (<100 km and <24 hours) and regional-scale (<500 km and <3 days) emissions, respectively. The contribution of secondary aerosols and their water uptake increased with altitude within the planetary boundary layer. This variation led to a considerable increase in column aerosol optical depth and was responsible for the differences in regional and temporal variations between surface and column aerosol optical properties around Beijing. These processes are expected to be common in other megacity regions as well. Model calculations, however, underestimated or overestimated the absolute levels of aerosol optical properties in and around Beijing by up to 60%. Sensitivity studies showed that these discrepancies were mostly due to the uncertainties in aerosol mixing state and aerosol density (affecting mass extinction efficiency) in the model calculations. Good agreement with measurements is achieved when these aerosol properties are accurately predicted or assumed; however, significant bias can result when these properties are inadequately treated, even if total aerosol mass concentrations are reproduced well in the model calculations.

[1]  D. Jacob,et al.  Transpacific Transport of Asian Anthropogenic Aerosols and its Impact on Surface Air Quality in the United States , 2006 .

[2]  W. Malm,et al.  Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States , 1994 .

[3]  J. Penner,et al.  Aerosol direct radiative effects over the northwest Atlantic, northwest Pacific, and North Indian Oceans: estimates based on in-situ chemical and optical measurements and chemical transport modeling , 2005 .

[4]  M. Molina,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher than expected , 2006 .

[5]  Georg A. Grell,et al.  Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model , 2005 .

[6]  Sunling Gong,et al.  CUACE/Dust – an integrated system of observation and modeling systems for operational dust forecasting in Asia , 2007 .

[7]  M. Kulmala,et al.  Aerosol formation during PARFORCE: Ternary nucleation of H2SO4, NH3, and H2O : New Particle Formation and Fate in the Coastal Environment (PARFORCE) , 2002 .

[8]  Anthony S. Wexler,et al.  A new method for multicomponent activity coefficients of electrolytes in aqueous atmospheric aerosols , 2005 .

[9]  Youhua Tang,et al.  Trans‐Pacific transport of black carbon and fine aerosols (D < 2.5 μm) into North America , 2007 .

[10]  Z. Kam,et al.  Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , 1998 .

[11]  LI Chengcai,et al.  A modeling analysis of a heavy air pollution episode occurred in Beijing , 2006 .

[12]  D. Blake,et al.  Export of anthropogenic reactive nitrogen and sulfur compounds from the East Asia region in spring , 2003 .

[13]  N. Takegawa,et al.  Rapid aerosol particle growth and increase of cloud condensation nucleus activity by secondary aerosol formation and condensation: A case study for regional air pollution in northeastern China , 2009 .

[14]  Anthony S. Wexler,et al.  Modelling urban and regional aerosols—I. model development , 1994 .

[15]  Nobuo Sugimoto,et al.  Record heavy Asian dust in Beijing in 2002: Observations and model analysis of recent events , 2003 .

[16]  R. Mathur Estimating the impact of the 2004 Alaskan forest fires on episodic particulate matter pollution over the eastern United States through assimilation of satellite‐derived aerosol optical depths in a regional air quality model , 2008 .

[17]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  An algorithm that retrieves aerosol properties from dual‐wavelength polarized lidar measurements , 2007 .

[18]  Alexandros Papayannis,et al.  Extraordinary dust event over Beijing, China, during April 2006: Lidar, Sun photometric, satellite observations and model validation , 2007, Geophysical Research Letters.

[19]  Christine Wiedinmyer,et al.  Evaluating simulated primary anthropogenic and biomass burning organic aerosols during MILAGRO: implications for assessing treatments of secondary organic aerosols , 2009 .

[20]  Steven J. Ghan,et al.  Coupling aerosol-cloud-radiative processes in the WRF-Chem model: Investigating the radiative impact of elevated point sources , 2008 .

[21]  M. Chin,et al.  Natural and transboundary pollution influences on sulfate‐nitrate‐ammonium aerosols in the United States: Implications for policy , 2004 .

[22]  Jun Wang,et al.  Intercomparison between satellite‐derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies , 2003 .

[23]  Y. H. Zhang,et al.  AEROSOL OPTICAL PROPERTIES IN A RURAL ENVIRONMENT NEAR THE MEGA-CITY GUANGZHOU, CHINA: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL AIR POLLUTION, RADIATIVE FORCING AND REMOTE SENSING , 2008 .

[24]  D. Chu,et al.  Improving National Air Quality Forecasts with Satellite Aerosol Observations , 2005 .

[25]  Tong Zhu,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations of aerosols around Beijing in summer 2006: Model evaluation and source apportionment , 2009, Journal of Geophysical Research.

[26]  D. Blake,et al.  Variability of submicron aerosol observed at a rural site in Beijing in the summer of 2006 , 2009 .

[27]  Spyros N. Pandis,et al.  Optimizing model performance: variable size resolution in cloud chemistry modeling , 2001 .

[28]  Steven J. Ghan,et al.  Impact on modeled cloud characteristics due to simplified treatment of uniform cloud condensation nuclei during NEAQS 2004 , 2007 .

[29]  R. Robinson,et al.  Interactions in Aqueous Nonelectrolyte Solutions. I. Solute-Solvent Equilibria , 1966 .

[30]  R. Martin,et al.  Estimating ground-level PM2.5 using aerosol optical depth determined from satellite remote sensing , 2006 .

[31]  R. C. Easter,et al.  Simulating the evolution of soot mixing state with a particle-resolved aerosol model , 2008, 0809.0875.

[32]  N. Sugimoto,et al.  A model tool for assessing real-time mixing of mineral and anthropogenic pollutants in East Asia: a case study of April 2005 , 2008 .

[33]  D. Blake,et al.  Evolution of mixing state of black carbon particles: Aircraft measurements over the western Pacific in March 2004 , 2007 .

[34]  M. Andreae,et al.  Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols , 2006 .

[35]  Zhaoyan Liu,et al.  Adjoint inversion modeling of Asian dust emission using lidar observations , 2008 .

[36]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Deconvolution and quantification of hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass spectrometry. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  G. Carmichael,et al.  Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B mission , 2009 .

[38]  G. Grell,et al.  Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology‐chemistry‐aerosol model , 2006 .

[39]  Leonard K. Peters,et al.  A computationally efficient Multicomponent Equilibrium Solver for Aerosols (MESA) , 2005 .

[40]  N. Takegawa,et al.  Aerosol optical properties observed during Campaign of Air Quality Research in Beijing 2006 (CAREBeijing‐2006): Characteristic differences between the inflow and outflow of Beijing city air , 2009 .

[41]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  New Particle Formation in the Remote Troposphere: A Comparison of Observations at Various Sites , 1999 .

[42]  D. Jacob,et al.  Mapping annual mean ground‐level PM2.5 concentrations using Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer aerosol optical thickness over the contiguous United States , 2004 .

[43]  Y. Yokouchi,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol formation in urban air: Temporal variations and possible contributions from unidentified hydrocarbons , 2009 .

[44]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions , 1995 .

[45]  E. Vermote,et al.  The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and Validation , 2005 .

[46]  Rohit Mathur,et al.  An evaluation of real‐time air quality forecasts and their urban emissions over eastern Texas during the summer of 2006 Second Texas Air Quality Study field study , 2009 .

[47]  Nobuo Sugimoto,et al.  Optical properties of atmospheric aerosols obtained by in situ and remote measurements during 2006 Campaign of Air Quality Research in Beijing (CAREBeijing‐2006) , 2009 .

[48]  T. Bond,et al.  Limitations in the enhancement of visible light absorption due to mixing state , 2006 .

[49]  L. Ruby Leung,et al.  Effects of soot‐induced snow albedo change on snowpack and hydrological cycle in western United States based on Weather Research and Forecasting chemistry and regional climate simulations , 2009 .

[50]  S. Howell,et al.  Aircraft profiles of aerosol microphysics and optical properties over North America: Aerosol optical depth and its association with PM2.5 and water uptake , 2007 .

[51]  Rohit Mathur,et al.  Assessment of an ensemble of seven real-time ozone forecasts over eastern North America during the summer of 2004 , 2005 .

[52]  Patrick Chazette,et al.  Development and validation of a simple mineral dust source inventory suitable for modelling in North Central China , 2005 .

[53]  N. Takegawa,et al.  Aging of black carbon in outflow from anthropogenic sources using a mixing state resolved model: Model development and evaluation , 2009 .

[54]  N. Takegawa,et al.  Temporal variations of elemental carbon in Tokyo , 2006 .

[55]  Rohit Mathur,et al.  Evaluation of several PM2.5 forecast models using data collected during the ICARTT/NEAQS 2004 field study: PM2.5 FORECAST MODEL EVALUATION , 2007 .

[56]  Shobha Kondragunta,et al.  Air Quality Forecast Verification Using Satellite Data , 2005 .

[57]  Rohit Mathur,et al.  A comparison of CMAQ‐based aerosol properties with IMPROVE, MODIS, and AERONET data , 2007 .

[58]  R. Turco,et al.  Modeling coagulation among particles of different composition and size , 1994 .

[59]  Nobuo Sugimoto,et al.  A high-resolution numerical study of the Asian dust storms of April 2001 , 2003 .

[60]  Tong Zhu,et al.  Performance of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) during Intensive Campaigns in China in the Summer of 2006 , 2009 .

[61]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Source-receptor relationships between East Asian sulfur dioxide emissions and Northern Hemisphere sulfate concentrations , 2008 .

[62]  Y. H. Zhang,et al.  Influence of soot mixing state on aerosol light absorption and single scattering albedo during air mass aging at a polluted regional site in northeastern China , 2009 .

[63]  Yutaka Kondo,et al.  Aging of black carbon in outflow from anthropogenic sources using a mixing state resolved model: 2. Aerosol optical properties and cloud condensation nuclei activities , 2009 .

[64]  P. Achtert,et al.  Mixing state of nonvolatile aerosol particle fractions and comparison with light absorption in the polluted Beijing region , 2009 .

[65]  Jerome D. Fast,et al.  Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC) , 2008 .