The orthogonal tilt reconstruction method.

Generating reliable initial models for novel asymmetric molecules, particularly heterogeneous ones, remains a major challenge in cryo-electron microscopy. Geometric reconstruction methods, relying on the ability to tilt the microscope stage to obtain two or more views of each molecule, are arguably the most robust for these types of samples as they generate independent reconstructions for each characteristic view obtained. Random Conical Tilt (RCT) is the classic geometric reconstruction method. Pairs of images are collected at high tilt (around 50°) and 0°. The latter are used to sort the data into characteristic views of the molecule and the former are used for their reconstruction. RCT's greatest strength is its ability to generate structures regardless of the number of orientations adopted by the sample on the support. Its major drawback stems from the limited tilt of the microscope stage; this results in an incomplete sampling of the structure in Fourier space and artifacts in its real space representation. Orthogonal Tilt Reconstruction (OTR), a modification of this data collection strategy, results in fully sampled structures. It relies on collecting data at -45° and +45° and treating the tilt pairs as equivalent to the ideal 0°/90° that cannot be collected directly in the microscope. OTR requires a sample that adopts a large number of orientations on the support. Here, the RCT and OTR methods are reviewed and their performances with a biological test sample are compared. The steps required to apply OTR are also discussed.

[1]  Georgios Skiniotis,et al.  Acetylated Histone Tail Peptides Induce Structural Rearrangements in the RSC Chromatin Remodeling Complex* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Structure of a RSC–nucleosome complex and insights into chromatin remodeling , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[3]  Eva Nogales,et al.  Architecture of the yeast Rrp44–exosome complex suggests routes of RNA recruitment for 3′ end processing , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[5]  Marin van Heel,et al.  Direct 3D Reconstruction from Projections with Initially Unknown Angles , 1985 .

[6]  N. Grigorieff,et al.  Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. , 2003, Journal of structural biology.

[7]  Pawel A Penczek,et al.  Exploring conformational modes of macromolecular assemblies by multiparticle cryo-EM. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[8]  Denis Fellmann,et al.  Automation of random conical tilt and orthogonal tilt data collection using feature-based correlation. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[9]  S. Harrison,et al.  Near-atomic resolution using electron cryomicroscopy and single-particle reconstruction , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Wen Jiang,et al.  EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[11]  Z. Zhou,et al.  3.88 Å structure of cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus by cryo-electron microscopy , 2008, Nature.

[12]  Eva Nogales,et al.  The orthogonal tilt reconstruction method: an approach to generating single-class volumes with no missing cone for ab initio reconstruction of asymmetric particles. , 2006, Journal of structural biology.

[13]  M. Heel,et al.  Angular reconstitution: a posteriori assignment of projection directions for 3D reconstruction. , 1987 .

[14]  Quansheng Liu,et al.  Reconstitution, Activities, and Structure of the Eukaryotic RNA Exosome , 2006, Cell.

[15]  Wei Zhang,et al.  GTPase activation of elongation factor EF‐Tu by the ribosome during decoding , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[16]  Thomas Walz,et al.  Negative Staining and Image Classification – Powerful Tools in Modern Electron Microscopy , 2004, Biological Procedures Online.

[17]  Andres E Leschziner,et al.  Conformational flexibility in the chromatin remodeler RSC observed by electron microscopy and the orthogonal tilt reconstruction method , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  José María Carazo,et al.  Image processing for electron microscopy single-particle analysis using XMIPP , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[19]  Francisco J. Asturias,et al.  Structural analysis of the RSC chromatin-remodeling complex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. Frank,et al.  Three‐dimensional reconstruction from a single‐exposure, random conical tilt series applied to the 50S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[21]  A Leith,et al.  SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[22]  J. Frank Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies , 2006 .

[23]  Dong-Hua Chen,et al.  De novo backbone trace of GroEL from single particle electron cryomicroscopy. , 2008, Structure.

[24]  M Radermacher,et al.  DoG Picker and TiltPicker: software tools to facilitate particle selection in single particle electron microscopy. , 2009, Journal of structural biology.

[25]  M van Heel,et al.  A new generation of the IMAGIC image processing system. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[26]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Structural Insight into Nascent Polypeptide Chain–Mediated Translational Stalling , 2009, Science.