Direct visualization of single-molecule translocations through synthetic nanopores comparable in size to a molecule.

A nanopore is the ultimate analytical tool. It can be used to detect DNA, RNA, oligonucleotides, and proteins with submolecular sensitivity. This extreme sensitivity is derived from the electric signal associated with the occlusion that develops during the translocation of the analyte across a membrane through a pore immersed in electrolyte. A larger occluded volume results in an improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio, and so the pore geometry should be made comparable to the size of the target molecule. However, the pore geometry also affects the electric field, the charge density, the electro-osmotic flow, the capture volume, and the response time. Seeking an optimal pore geometry, we tracked the molecular motion in three dimensions with high resolution, visualizing with confocal microscopy the fluorescence associated with DNA translocating through nanopores with diameters comparable to the double helix, while simultaneously measuring the pore current. Measurements reveal single molecules translocating across the membrane through the pore commensurate with the observation of a current blockade. To explain the motion of the molecule near the pore, finite-element simulations were employed that account for diffusion, electrophoresis, and the electro-osmotic flow. According to this analysis, detection using a nanopore comparable in diameter to the double helix represents a compromise between sensitivity, capture volume, the minimum detectable concentration, and response time.

[1]  M. Niederweis,et al.  Reading DNA at single-nucleotide resolution with a mutant MspA nanopore and phi29 DNA polymerase , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  H. Heumann,et al.  Solution structure of a short DNA fragment studied by neutron scattering. , 1986, European journal of biochemistry.

[3]  Vivek V. Thacker,et al.  Studying DNA translocation in nanocapillaries using single molecule fluorescence. , 2012, Applied physics letters.

[4]  Niles A Pierce,et al.  Protein design is NP-hard. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[5]  Mark Akeson,et al.  Automated Forward and Reverse Ratcheting of DNA in a Nanopore at Five Angstrom Precision1 , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  J. M. Scholtz,et al.  Interactions of peptides with a protein pore. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Yingchun Liu,et al.  Transport properties and distribution of water molecules confined in hydrophobic nanopores and nanoslits. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[8]  D. Grahame The electrical double layer and the theory of electrocapillarity. , 1947, Chemical reviews.

[9]  T. Mitsui,et al.  Directly observing the motion of DNA molecules near solid-state nanopores. , 2012, ACS nano.

[10]  A. Meller,et al.  Synchronous optical and electrical detection of biomolecules traversing through solid-state nanopores. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[11]  D. Talaga,et al.  Single-molecule protein unfolding in solid state nanopores. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  Heidelinde R. C. Dietrich,et al.  The persistence length of double stranded DNA determined using dark field tethered particle motion. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  K. Yoshikawa,et al.  Hydrodynamic radius of circular DNA is larger than that of linear DNA , 2006 .

[14]  Muhammad A. Alam,et al.  Performance limits of nanobiosensors , 2006 .

[15]  Susan Daniel,et al.  Single ion-channel recordings using glass nanopore membranes. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  N. Dekker,et al.  Distinguishable populations report on the interactions of single DNA molecules with solid-state nanopores. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[17]  B. Ladanyi,et al.  Structure and dynamics of water confined in silica nanopores. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[18]  Rashid Bashir,et al.  DNA-Mediated Fluctuations in Ionic Current through Silicon Oxide Nanopore Channels. Nano Lett., 4(8), 1551-1556 , 2004 .

[19]  Aleksei Aksimentiev,et al.  Electro-osmotic screening of the DNA charge in a nanopore. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Alexander Y. Grosberg,et al.  DNA capture into a nanopore: interplay of diffusion and electrohydrodynamics. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  G. Timp,et al.  Using a nanopore for single molecule detection and single cell transfection. , 2012, The Analyst.

[22]  Rae M. Robertson,et al.  Diffusion of isolated DNA molecules: dependence on length and topology. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  U. Keyser,et al.  Salt dependence of ion transport and DNA translocation through solid-state nanopores. , 2006, Nano letters.

[24]  S. Jacobson,et al.  Ion transport in nanofluidic funnels. , 2010, ACS nano.

[25]  G. Timp,et al.  Microscopic mechanics of hairpin DNA translocation through synthetic nanopores. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Ruoshan Wei,et al.  Stochastic sensing of proteins with receptor-modified solid-state nanopores. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[27]  A. Meller,et al.  DNA profiling using solid-state nanopores: detection of DNA-binding molecules. , 2009, Nano letters.

[28]  Meni Wanunu,et al.  DNA translocation governed by interactions with solid-state nanopores. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[29]  G. Patriarche,et al.  Protein transport through a narrow solid-state nanopore at high voltage: experiments and theory. , 2012, ACS nano.

[30]  H. Bayley,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of ionic current and fluorescence from single protein pores. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  Andre Marziali,et al.  Evaluation of nanopores as candidates for electronic analyte detection , 2002, Electrophoresis.

[32]  K. Schulten,et al.  Sizing DNA using a nanometer-diameter pore. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[33]  D. Branton,et al.  Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  H. Bayley,et al.  Catalyzing the translocation of polypeptides through attractive interactions. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[35]  Jacob J. Schmidt,et al.  Discrimination of single base substitutions in a DNA strand immobilized in a biological nanopore. , 2009, ACS nano.

[36]  K. Schulten,et al.  The electromechanics of DNA in a synthetic nanopore. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[37]  Chuen Ho,et al.  Electrolytic transport through a synthetic nanometer-diameter pore. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  S. Lindsay,et al.  Optical and electrical detection of single-molecule translocation through carbon nanotubes. , 2013, ACS nano.

[39]  Aleksei Aksimentiev,et al.  Slowing the translocation of double-stranded DNA using a nanopore smaller than the double helix , 2010, Nanotechnology.

[40]  Effects of electrostatic screening on the conformation of single DNA molecules confined in a nanochannel. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[41]  K. Schulten,et al.  Microscopic Kinetics of DNA Translocation through synthetic nanopores. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Yaoqi Zhou,et al.  Energy functions in de novo protein design: current challenges and future prospects. , 2013, Annual review of biophysics.

[43]  Erik Meijering,et al.  Methods for cell and particle tracking. , 2012, Methods in enzymology.

[44]  Sheereen Majd,et al.  Controlling protein translocation through nanopores with bio-inspired fluid walls , 2011 .

[45]  C. Bustamante,et al.  Direct visualization of individual DNA molecules by fluorescence microscopy: characterization of the factors affecting signal/background and optimization of imaging conditions using YOYO. , 1997, Analytical biochemistry.

[46]  David Stoddart,et al.  Single-nucleotide discrimination in immobilized DNA oligonucleotides with a biological nanopore , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.