The emergence of tuning in newly generated tuberous electroreceptors

Tuning curves of afferent electroreceptive fibers in the anterior lateral line nerve of the weakly electric fish, Sternopygus macrurus, indicate that the tuberous electroreceptors of each individual are well- tuned to its own electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency. In order to study how receptor tuning may develop, new receptor organs were induced to form in regenerating cheek skin, and their tuning properties were compared with those of intact receptors from the same fish. At 3 weeks after the onset of regeneration, new receptors of a given fish were broadly tuned with best frequencies (BFs) lower than that fish's EOD frequency and the BFs of its own intact tuberous receptors. Three weeks later, regenerated receptors of the same fish were indistinguishable from intact receptors in BF, although tuning curves were occasionally slightly broader than normal. To determine if the presence of an ongoing electric field is necessary for the genesis of proper tuning, receptors were allowed to regenerate in fish deprived of their EODs. At 6 weeks, tuning curves of these receptors also had BFs that were tuned similarly to intact receptors and to each individual's characteristic EOD frequency (determined by recordings of the pacemaker nucleus in the medulla). Thus, as regenerating receptors mature, they gradually become more sharply tuned and tuned to progressively higher frequencies until reaching the correct BF, which matches the EOD frequency; however, tuning to the appropriate EOD frequency occurs without reference to the ongoing electric field.

[1]  H. W. Lissmann,et al.  Organization of ampullary electric receptors in Gymnotidae (Pisces) , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  S. W. Bailey An experimental study of the origin of lateral-line structures in embryonic and adult teleosts , 1937 .

[3]  N. Spitzer Ion channels in development. , 1979, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Henning Scheich,et al.  The Detection of Electric Fields from Electric Organs , 1974 .

[5]  L. Stone The development of lateral‐line sense organs in amphibians observed in living and vital‐stained preparations , 1933 .

[6]  A. Wachtel,et al.  Special cutaneous receptor organs of fish: The tuberous organs of Eigenmannia , 1966 .

[7]  G. Shepherd,et al.  Changes in the electrical properties of olfactory epithelial cells in the tiger salamander after olfactory nerve transection , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Schmidt,et al.  Activity sharpens the map during the regeneration of the retinotectal projection in goldfish , 1983, Brain Research.

[9]  C. Carr,et al.  Peripheral organization and central projections of the electrosensory nerves in gymnotiform fish , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  J. Denizot,et al.  New formation of sensory cells in the tuberous organ (Electroreceptor) of Brienomyrus niger (Mormyridae) induced by transection of afferent nerve , 1985, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Carr,et al.  Single electrocytes produce a sexually dimorphic signal in South American electric fish,Hypopomus occidentalis (Gymnotiformes, Hypopomidae) , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  G. R. Noakes,et al.  Vibrations and Waves , 1962, Nature.

[13]  A H Bass,et al.  Temporal coding of species recognition signals in an electric fish. , 1981, Science.

[14]  R. H. Hamstra,et al.  Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: high-frequency electroreceptors in the electric fish, Eigenmannia. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  N Suga,et al.  Coding in tuberous and ampullary organs of a gymnotid electric fish , 1967, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  G. Westby,et al.  SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE ELECTRIC ORGAN DISCHARGE OF EIGENMANNIA VIRESCENS AND THE EFFECT OF GONADAL MATURATION , 1981 .

[17]  R B Szamier,et al.  Special cutaneous receptor organs of fish: VI. Ampullary and tuberous organs of Hypopomus , 1970 .

[18]  Y. Zohar,et al.  7 The Gonadal Steroids , 1983 .

[19]  M. Bennett,et al.  RAPID DEGENERATION OF AMPULLARY ELECTRORECEPTOR ORGANS AFTER DENERVATION , 1973, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  C. Hopkins Principles of electrolocation and jamming avoidance in electric fish: Studies in brain function. Vol. I By W. Heiligenberg. New York: Springer Verlag (1977). Paper: $10.40 , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Carl D. Hopkins,et al.  On the Diversity of Electric Signals in a Community of Mormyrid Electric Fish in West Africa , 1981 .

[22]  Gerald T. Filipski,et al.  Sudan black B as a nerve stain for whole cleared fishes , 1984 .

[23]  T H Bullock,et al.  Further analysis of sensory coding in electroreceptors of electric fish. , 1965, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. Meyer Steroid influences upon the discharge frequencies of a weakly electric fish , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[25]  K. Elekes,et al.  COMPARATIVE SYNAPTOLOGY OF THE PACEMAKER NUCLEUS IN THE BRAIN OF WEAKLY ELECTRIC FISH (GYMNOTIDAE) , 1981 .

[26]  H. Zakon Postembryonic changes in the peripheral electrosensory system of a weakly electric fish: Addition of receptor organs with age , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  M. V. Bennett,et al.  Physiology and ultrastructure of electrotonic junctions. IV. Medullary electromotor nuclei in gymnotid fish. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  H. Zakon,et al.  Androgens Alter the Tuning of Electroreceptors , 1982, Science.

[29]  T Szabo,et al.  Sense organs of the lateral line system in some electric fish of the Gymnotidae, Mormyridae and Gymnarchidae , 1965, Journal of morphology.

[30]  K. E. Machin,et al.  The Mechanism of Object Location in Gymnarchus Niloticus and Similar Fish , 1958 .

[31]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Court and spark: electric signals in the courtship and mating of gymnotoid fish , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  T. Szabo Anatomy of the Specialized Lateral Line Organs of Electroreception , 1974 .

[33]  C. Hopkins Electric communication in the reproductive behavior of Sternopygus macrurus (Gymnotoidei). , 2010, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[34]  A. J. Hudspeth,et al.  Voltage- and ion-dependent conductances in solitary vertebrate hair cells , 1983, Nature.

[35]  F. Meunier,et al.  Experimental regeneration of the caudal skeleton of the glass knifefish, Eigenmannia virescens (Rhamphichthydae, Gymnotoidei) , 1981, Journal of morphology.

[36]  T. Szabo,et al.  The effect of sensory nerve transsection on the sensory cells and on the receptor potential of the tuberous (Knollen) organ in mormyrid fish (Gnathonemus sp.) , 1969, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[37]  R. Miledi,et al.  Characteristics of transmitter release at regenerating frog neuromuscular junctions , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  C. C. Bell,et al.  Effect of electric organ discharge on ampullary receptors in a mormyrid , 1978, Brain Research.

[39]  A H Bass,et al.  Hormonal control of sexual differentiation: changes in electric organ discharge waveform. , 1983, Science.

[40]  R. Fettiplace,et al.  An electrical tuning mechanism in turtle cochlear hair cells , 1981, The Journal of physiology.