Adverse condition and critical event prediction in commercial buildings: Danish case study

Over the last two decades, there has been a growing realization that the actual energy performances of many buildings fail to meet the original intent of building design. Faults in systems and equipment, incorrectly configured control systems and inappropriate operating procedures increase the energy consumption about 20% and therefore compromise the building energy performance. To improve the energy performance of buildings and to prevent occupant discomfort, adverse condition and critical event prediction plays an important role. The Adverse Condition and Critical Event Prediction Toolbox (ACCEPT) is a generic framework to compare and contrast methods that enable prediction of an adverse event, with low false alarm and missed detection rates. In this paper, ACCEPT is used for fault detection and prediction in a real building at the University of Southern Denmark. To make fault detection and prediction possible, machine learning methods such as Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) are used. A new PCA–based method is developed for artificial fault generation. While the proposed method finds applications in different areas, it has been used primarily for analysis purposes in this work. The results are evaluated, discussed and compared with results from Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA) with KDE. The results show that ACCEPT is more powerful than CVA with KDE which is known to be one of the best multivariate data-driven techniques in particular, under dynamically changing operational conditions.

[1]  Hamid Reza Shaker,et al.  Adverse Condition and Critical Event Prediction in Cranfield Multiphase Flow Facility , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Sensing, Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Control (SDPC).

[2]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Comparison of Selected Model Evaluation Criteria for Maintenance Applications , 2004 .

[3]  Oleg Okun Feature Selection and Ensemble Methods for Bioinformatics: Algorithmic Classification and Implementations , 2011 .

[4]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems , 2001 .

[5]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Fault Sample Generation for Virtual Testability Demonstration Test Subject to Minimal Maintenance and Scheduled Replacement , 2015 .

[6]  Sanja Lazarova-Molnar,et al.  A new data-driven controllability measure with application in intelligent buildings , 2017 .

[7]  Guanghui Sun,et al.  New Developments in Sliding Mode Control and Its Applications , 2014 .

[8]  Mo Sha,et al.  A Virtual Sample Generation Approach for Blast Furnace Fault Diagnosis , 2013 .

[9]  Evan Mills Building commissioning: a golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions in the United States , 2011 .

[10]  Verónica Bolón-Canedo,et al.  Recent advances and emerging challenges of feature selection in the context of big data , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[11]  Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard,et al.  Challenge: Advancing Energy Informatics to Enable Assessable Improvements of Energy Performance in Buildings , 2015, e-Energy.

[12]  Rodney Martin,et al.  ACCEPT: Introduction of the Adverse Condition and Critical Event Prediction Toolbox , 2015 .

[13]  Cristobal Ruiz-Carcel,et al.  Statistical process monitoring of a multiphase flow facility , 2015 .

[14]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[15]  Henrik M. Tommerup Energibesparelser i eksisterende og nye boliger , 2004 .

[16]  P. Phillips,et al.  Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? , 1992 .

[17]  George C. Runger,et al.  Feature Selection with Ensembles, Artificial Variables, and Redundancy Elimination , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[18]  Nader Mohamed,et al.  Fault detection and diagnosis for smart buildings: State of the art, trends and challenges , 2016, 2016 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (ICBDSC).

[19]  Yi Cao,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Process Monitoring Using Canonical Variate Analysis and Kernel Density Estimations , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[20]  Antero Arkkio,et al.  A simplified scheme for induction motor condition monitoring , 2008 .

[21]  Der-Chiang Li,et al.  The attribute-trend-similarity method to improve learning performance for small datasets , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..