A Simulation Course on Lifesaving Techniques for Third-Year Medical Students

Background: The University of Virginia School of Medicine discontinued animal vivisection in February 2004 for teaching lifesaving procedures to third-year medical students. Consequently, a 1-day course using simulation technology was developed to meet objectives previously covered in the animal laboratory. The authors sought to evaluate the course and hypothesized that the students’ confidence in lifesaving procedures as well as their acceptance of simulation technology as a teaching tool would increase. Methods: The course was designed in a two-session format. The first session (first half of the day) concentrated on individual procedure skills, utilizing part-task trainers. The second session (second half of the day) used a Medical Education Technologies Inc. (METI) Emergency Care Simulator (ECS) full-body patient simulator to present a major trauma scenario. The study design was a prospective, pretest-posttest study without a control group. A 10-question pre and post survey used a Likert scale to explore students’ confidence in their skills as well as their acceptance of simulation technology. A course evaluation used a similar Likert scale for evaluation of the course substations, the trauma scenario, and students’ self-assessment of their skill levels as well as a 100% point scale for an overall rating of the course. Results: A total of eight 1-day courses were successfully held over 2 years with a total enrollment of 240 students utilizing 20 instructors inclusive of faculty, residents, and other emergency medicine health care providers. For the pre and post survey results, there was a significant increase in students’ confidence in performing lifesaving procedures as well as their acceptance of simulation as a teaching tool (P < 0.05 for each question with pre n = 222 and post n = 226). For the course evaluation results (n = 190), all of the course substations were rated in the good to excellent range and the course received an overall score of 97.55 ± 7.23% out of 100%. Furthermore, students reported a significant increase in their skill level (P < 0.05). Conclusion: This lifesaving techniques course utilizing simulation technology successfully covered objectives previously taught with animal vivisection, increased students’ confidence levels in performing lifesaving procedures and was highly accepted by the medical students.

[1]  Elizabeth G Armstrong,et al.  Can a Simulated Critical Care Encounter Accelerate Basic Science Learning Among Preclinical Medical Students? A Pilot Study , 2006, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[2]  R. Steadman,et al.  Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[3]  Clinical skills in acute care: a role for simulation training. , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[4]  Ake Grenvik,et al.  From Resusci-Anne to Sim-Man: the evolution of simulators in medicine. , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[5]  Michael A Seropian,et al.  General Concepts in Full Scale Simulation: Getting Started , 2003, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  R M Harden,et al.  Adoption and integration of simulation‐based learning technologies into the curriculum of a UK Undergraduate Education Programme , 2003, Medical education.

[7]  David P Sklar,et al.  Human simulation in emergency medicine training: a model curriculum. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[8]  Kenji Hira,et al.  Evaluation of trauma team performance using an advanced human patient simulator for resuscitation training. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  B. Ho,et al.  Teaching first-year medical students physiology: does the human patient simulator allow for more effective teaching? , 2002, Singapore medical journal.

[10]  Glenn Regehr,et al.  Measuring Self-assessment: Current State of the Art , 2002, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[11]  T. Krummel,et al.  Use of a human patient simulator in the development of resident trauma management skills. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  T. Euliano.  Small group teaching: clinical correlation with a human patient simulator. , 2001, Advances in physiology education.

[13]  J. Gordon,et al.  The human patient simulator: acceptance and efficacy as a teaching tool for students. The Medical Readiness Trainer Team. , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[14]  J W Mayer,et al.  "Harvey," the cardiology patient simulator: pilot studies on teaching effectiveness. , 1980, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  J. W. Mayer,et al.  Teaching bedside cardiologic examination skills using "Harvey", the cardiology patient simulator. , 1980, The Medical clinics of North America.

[16]  J. S. Denson,et al.  A computer-controlled patient simulator. , 1969, JAMA.

[17]  Lawrence T. Post,et al.  American College of Surgeons , 2020, Definitions.