Systematic mixed-methods reviews are not ready to be assessed with the available tools.

[1]  David Moher,et al.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[2]  J. Popay,et al.  Methodological issues in the synthesis of diverse sources of evidence. , 2006 .

[3]  Jeremy Grimshaw,et al.  AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  Michael Crowe,et al.  A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  Alessandro Liberati,et al.  Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  P. Pluye,et al.  A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[7]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  P. Katrak,et al.  A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools , 2004, BMC medical research methodology.

[9]  Catherine Pope,et al.  Moving Beyond Effectiveness in evidence Synthesis: methodological issues in the synthesis of diverse sources of evidence , 2006 .

[10]  David R. Jones,et al.  How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective , 2006 .