Computed tomographic angiography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis and evaluation of acute pancreatitis in dogs

Background Acute pancreatitis in dogs is an under‐diagnosed disease. Current diagnostic methods are insufficient at identifying sequelae and lack prognostic capability. Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is accurate for diagnosis and prognostication of pancreatitis in humans. Objectives In comparison to ultrasound (US), CTA will (1) better diagnose more severe pancreatitis and sequelae and (2) provide assessment of patient outcome by identification of pancreatic contrast enhancement patterns. Animals Twenty‐six client‐owned dogs suspected to have acute pancreatitis. Methods US and CTA examinations performed at time of admission were compared to determine the detection of pancreatic changes and sequelae. CTA findings also were compared to outcome indicators for prognosis of dogs with acute pancreatitis. Specific canine pancreatic lipase (cPL) samples were obtained and compared with CTA findings. Results Ten of 26 dogs had heterogeneous contrast enhancement of the pancreas. Compared to US, CTA better identified portal vein thrombosis (P = .003). Patients with heterogeneous contrast enhancement had longer hospitalization (P = .01), including hospital stays for >5 days (P = .02), had more relapses, and were more likely to have portal vein thrombosis (P = .002). Patients with heterogeneous contrast enhancement had increased spec cPL (P = .006). Conclusions and Clinical Importance In comparison to US, CTA better identified dogs with more severe acute pancreatitis and those with portal vein thrombosis, factors that may predict longer hospitalization and increased risk of relapse. The presence of heterogeneous contrast enhancement and portal vein thrombosis may change therapy for patients with acute pancreatitis.

[1]  Erratum for Computed tomographic angiography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis and evaluation of acute pancreatitis in dogs , 2019, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[2]  J. Lidbury,et al.  New advances in the diagnosis of canine and feline liver and pancreatic disease. , 2016, Veterinary journal.

[3]  P. J. Armstrong,et al.  Safety of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the feline pancreas: a case-control study , 2015, Journal of feline medicine and surgery.

[4]  A. Marolf,et al.  Computed Tomographic Angiography under Sedation in the Diagnosis of Suspected Canine Pancreatitis: A Pilot Study , 2014, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[5]  J. Mattoon,et al.  Chapter 11 – Pancreas , 2015 .

[6]  B. Edwin,et al.  Pancreatic biopsy by minimal tail resection in live adult patients at the onset of type 1 diabetes: experiences from the DiViD study , 2014, Diabetologia.

[7]  G. Voorhout,et al.  Computed tomographic characteristics of presumed normal canine abdominal lymph nodes. , 2013, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[8]  C. Webster,et al.  Ultrasonographic measurement of the pancreas and pancreatic duct in clinically normal dogs. , 2013, American journal of veterinary research.

[9]  Colin D Johnson,et al.  Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus , 2012, Gut.

[10]  C. Mansfield Acute pancreatitis in dogs: advances in understanding, diagnostics, and treatment. , 2012, Topics in companion animal medicine.

[11]  D. Biller,et al.  A multi-institutional study evaluating the diagnostic utility of the spec cPL™ and SNAP® cPL™ in clinical acute pancreatitis in 84 dogs. , 2012, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[12]  Vikesh K. Singh,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Radiologic and Clinical Scoring Systems in the Early Prediction of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis , 2012, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[13]  C. Webster,et al.  Portal vein thrombosis in 33 dogs: 1998-2011. , 2012, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[14]  J. Luff,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of canine pancreas-specific lipase (cPL) and other markers for pancreatitis in 70 dogs with and without histopathologic evidence of pancreatitis. , 2011, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[15]  P. J. Armstrong,et al.  Effect of Pancreatic Tissue Sampling on Serum Pancreatic Enzyme Levels in Clinically Healthy Dogs , 2010, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[16]  R. Dubielzig,et al.  Computed tomography characteristics of canine tracheobronchial lymph node metastasis. , 2010, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[17]  P. J. Armstrong,et al.  Diseases of the gallbladder and biliary tree. , 2009 .

[18]  Dominique G. Penninck,et al.  Atlas of small animal ultrasonography , 2008 .

[19]  J. Steiner,et al.  Sensitivity of serum markers for pancreatitis in dogs with macroscopic evidence of pancreatitis. , 2008, Veterinary therapeutics : research in applied veterinary medicine.

[20]  P. Watson,et al.  Prevalence and breed distribution of chronic pancreatitis at post-mortem examination in first-opinion dogs. , 2007, The Journal of small animal practice.

[21]  J. Kinns,et al.  Association between malignancy and sonographic heterogeneity in canine and feline abdominal lymph nodes. , 2007, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[22]  A. Zwingenberger,et al.  Helical computed tomographic angiography of the normal canine pancreas. , 2006, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[23]  J. Steiner Diagnosis of pancreatitis. , 2003, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[24]  E. Balthazar Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. , 2002, Radiology.

[25]  John S. Mattoon,et al.  Small Animal Diagnostic Ultrasound , 2002 .

[26]  R. Nelson,et al.  Acute pancreatitis complicated by gland necrosis: spectrum of findings on contrast-enhanced CT. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  F. Shofer,et al.  Evaluation of risk factors for fatal acute pancreatitis in dogs. , 1999, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[28]  F. Shofer,et al.  Clinical, clinicopathologic, radiographic, and ultrasonographic abnormalities in dogs with fatal acute pancreatitis: 70 cases (1986-1995). , 1998, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[29]  R. Martin,et al.  Extrahepatic biliary tract obstruction: a retrospective study of 45 cases (1983-1993). , 1995, Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association.

[30]  T. V. Van Winkle,et al.  Thrombosis of the Portal Vein in Eleven Dogs , 1993, Veterinary pathology.

[31]  C. Johnson,et al.  CT of acute pancreatitis: correlation between lack of contrast enhancement and pancreatic necrosis. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  D L Robinson,et al.  Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. , 1990, Radiology.

[33]  E. Bradley,et al.  Prediction of Pancreatic Necrosis by Dynamic Pancreatography , 1989, Annals of surgery.

[34]  J. Neoptolemos,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced abdominal computed tomography scanning and prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis: A prospective study , 1989, The British journal of surgery.

[35]  W. Maier Early Objective Diagnosis and Staging of Acute Pancreatitis by Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography , 1987 .

[36]  M. Büchler,et al.  How do Imaging Methods Influence the Surgical Strategy in Acute Pancreatitis , 1986 .

[37]  A. Megibow,et al.  Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. , 1985, Radiology.