Understanding the accuracy of tests with cutting scores: the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value model.

While researchers usually are concerned about psychometric properties of psychological tests estimated using large samples, most clinical decision-makers must evaluate the accuracy of test results for individuals. This is particularly true as regards tests that have cutting scores to determine, for example, whether to assign a particular diagnosis or accept an applicant into a training program. This paper reviews a conceptual model that may foster improved understanding of test outcomes for individuals. The terms "sensitivity," "specificity," and "predictive value" are defined, and the relations of positive and negative predictive values to population base rates are emphasized. Examples from the psychological literature are presented to illustrate the utility of these concepts in clinical decision-making with psychological tests. Implications for test users, test developers, and instructors are discussed.

[1]  D. Lachar,et al.  The Personality Inventory for Children and response to methylphenidate: preliminary evidence for predictive utility. , 1983, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[2]  W. Miller Alcoholism scales and objective assessment methods: a review. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  M. Kovács Rating scales to assess depression in school-aged children. , 1981, Acta paedopsychiatrica.

[4]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Personality and prediction: principles of personality assessment / Jerry S. Wiggins , 1973 .

[5]  E. Cureton Recipe for a cookbook. , 1957, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  R. D. Wirt Multidimensional description of child personality : a manual for the personality inventory for children , 1977 .

[7]  A. Kazdin,et al.  Assessment of depression and diagnosis of depressive disorder among psychiatrically disturbed children , 1986, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[8]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Applied psychology in personnel management , 1978 .

[9]  T J Vecchio,et al.  Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations. , 1966, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  S. Irwin,et al.  Single and repeat dose effects of imipramine and chlorpromazine in man. , 1971, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[11]  C. Macandrew THE DIFFERENTIATION OF MALE ALCOHOLIC OUTPATIENTS FROM NONALCOHOLIC PSYCHIATRIC OUTPATIENTS BY MEANS OF THE MMPI. , 1965, Quarterly journal of studies on alcohol.

[12]  Cost efficiency and test prediction. , 1963, Journal of consulting psychology.

[13]  R. Kline Methodological considerations in the evaluation of the convergence of psychiatric diagnoses and parent-informant checklists , 1988, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[14]  A. Rosen Detection of suicidal patients: an example of some limitations in the prediction of infrequent events. , 1954, Journal of consulting psychology.

[15]  Graham F. Wagstaff,et al.  Personality assessment , 1980, Nature.

[16]  L. Cronbach Essentials of psychological testing , 1960 .

[17]  P. Greenland,et al.  Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications. , 1981, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  J. Yerushalmy Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to X-ray techniques. , 1947, Public health reports.

[19]  Report of the Conference on the Use of Stimulant Drugs In the Treatment of Behaviorially Disturbed Young School Children , 1971, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[20]  R. Detels,et al.  A survey diagnostic tool for senile dementia. , 1981, American journal of epidemiology.

[21]  R. Dawes A note on base rates and psychometric efficiency. , 1962, Journal of consulting psychology.

[22]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Psychological tests and personnel decisions , 1958 .

[23]  E. Robins,et al.  Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. , 1978, Archives of general psychiatry.

[24]  P. Meehl,et al.  Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.