Impact of Urine Collection Order on the Ability of Assays to Identify Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Men

Background Noninvasive urine samples have been used to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infections, with the assumption that the first-void urine (FVU), defined as the first 20 to 30 ml at any micturition, would be the optimal collection. We compared testing technologies on first, second, and third volumes for diagnosis. Goal The goal was to test in nonculture assays three sequential volumes of urine from men also undergoing urethral swabbing for C trachomatis culture specimens. Study Design A total of 237 men attending an STD clinic (C trachomatis prevalence, 11%) collected three containers of urine (each containing 20–30 mL) for testing in four nonculture assays. A urethral swab specimen was tested in cell culture. Results The numbers of men positive by testing of FVU with nucleic acid amplification (LCx chlamydia), nucleic acid hybridization (PACE 2), enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme), and a leukocyte esterase dipstick were 26, 7, 14, and 11, respectively; urethral culture identified 6 of the infected men. Comparative testing of all voids from the 26 men positive by the FVU assays demonstrated a reduction of LCx-positives. Non-amplified-test positivity declined precipitously in subsequent voids, approaching zero in the third void. The presence of symptoms and time of last void up to 8 hours had little effect on the number of positives detected by LCx of FVU. Conclusion Amplified testing of FVU was most effective for diagnosing infection in these men.

[1]  P. Mårdh,et al.  Non-invasive sampling for detection of genital infection withChlamydia trachomatis in males utilising urinary leukocyte esterase tests and immunoassays , 1994, Infection.

[2]  E. Sandström,et al.  Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in urine from men with urethritis , 1993, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[3]  L. Pickard,et al.  Effect of time elapsed since previous voiding on the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis antigens in urine , 1993, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[4]  T. Farley,et al.  Evaluation of the Gen‐Probe PACE 2 Assay for the Detection of Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections in Male Arrestees , 1998, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[5]  J. Sellors,et al.  Urine Specimens from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women Inhibitory to Amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis Nucleic Acid by PCR, Ligase Chain Reaction, and Transcription-Mediated Amplification: Identification of Urinary Substances Associated with Inhibition and Removal of Inhibitory Activity , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[6]  Helen H. Lee,et al.  Performance of Transcription-Mediated Amplification and Ligase Chain Reaction Assays for Detection of Chlamydial Infection in Urogenital Samples Obtained by Invasive and Noninvasive Methods , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  J. Sellors,et al.  Ability of commercial ligase chain reaction and PCR assays to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men by testing first-void urine , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[8]  M. Yasuda,et al.  Comparison among performances of a ligase chain reaction-based assay and two enzyme immunoassays in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men with nongonococcal urethritis , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[9]  H. Zeidler,et al.  Sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for purified Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in urine, peripheral blood, peripheral blood leukocytes, and synovial fluid , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[10]  C. Henquet,et al.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[11]  Helen H. Lee,et al.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction , 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[12]  F. Plummer,et al.  Leukocyte esterase urine strips for the screening of men with urethritis--use in developing countries. , 1994, Genitourinary medicine.

[13]  T. Quinn,et al.  Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine of asymptomatic men , 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[14]  J. Douglas,et al.  Evaluation of chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[15]  J. Sellors,et al.  Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[16]  L. Pickard,et al.  Screening Urine with a Leukocyte Esterase Strip and Subsequent Chlamydial Testing of Asymptomatic Men Attending Primary Care Practitioners , 1993, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[17]  T. Quinn,et al.  Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[18]  J. Cruz,et al.  Evaluation of three immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from asymptomatic males , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[19]  M. Pettinger,et al.  Use of a urine enzyme immunoassay as a diagnostic tool for Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men , 1991, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[20]  B. Thomas,et al.  Simplification of procedures used to test urine samples for Chlamydia trachomatis. , 1991, Journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  J. Sellors,et al.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in urine as an alternative to swabs and cultures. , 1990, The Journal of infectious diseases.