Effects of Cooperative and Individual Learning during Learner-Controlled Computer-Based Instruction

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects on the achievement, option use, attitudes, and interactions of college students of instructional method (cooperative vs. individual) and learner control of options during computer-based instruction. The students worked alone or with a partner to complete a computer lesson that provided either a full program with the option to bypass instruction (full-minus condition) or a lean program with the option to select additional instruction (lean-plus condition). The students in the full-minus condition used significantly more optional practice items and spent more time on practice than the students in the lean-plus condition did. The cooperative dyads spent significantly longer on practice items and selected significantly more elaborative feedback items during selected-response practice than the students working alone did. However, no significant achievement differences were found for instructional method or learner-control mode. The results suggest that the achievement benefits of cooperative learning found in previous research may not apply to situations in which mature students are provided with an instructional environment with many learner-controlled options.

[1]  Simon Hooper.  Effects of Peer Interaction during Computer-Based Mathematics Instruction. , 1992 .

[2]  Simon Hooper,et al.  Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction , 1992 .

[3]  David Trowbridge,et al.  Results from an Investigation of Groups Working at the Computer. , 1984 .

[4]  Esther R. Steinberg,et al.  Review of Student Control in Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1977 .

[5]  Howard J. Sullivan,et al.  Teaching for Competence , 1983 .

[6]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Learner Control and Achievement in Science Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1988 .

[7]  David W. Dalton,et al.  Effects of individual and cooperative computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes , 1989 .

[8]  J. A. Campanizzi.  Effects of Locus of Control and Provision of Overviews in a Computer-Assisted Instruction Sequence , 1978 .

[9]  Zemira R. Mevarech,et al.  Learning with Computers in Small Groups: Cognitive and Affective Outcomes , 1991 .

[10]  Carol A. Carrier.  Selection of Options by Field Independent and Dependent Children in a Computer-Based Concept Lesson. , 1984 .

[11]  Samuel Hicken,et al.  Learner control modes and incentive variations in computer-delivered instruction , 1992 .

[12]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[13]  Martha S. Doran.  The effects of individual, cooperative and collaborative learning structures using a computer simulation in accounting , 1995 .

[14]  Theodore M. Shlechter.  The Relative Instructional Efficiency of Small Group Computer-Based Training , 1990 .

[15]  R. Slavin.  When does cooperative learning increase student achievement , 1983 .

[16]  James D. Klein,et al.  Effects of individual versus cooperative learning and type of reward on performance and continuing motivation , 1994 .

[17]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Uses and effects of learner control of context and instructional support in computer-based instruction , 1989 .

[18]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  How Computers are Used in United States Schools: Basic Data from the 1989 I.E.A. Computers in Education Survey , 1991 .

[19]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning with computers in small groups , 1987 .

[20]  S. Bossert,et al.  Cooperative Activities in the Classroom , 1988 .

[21]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Point-Counterpoint: Ability Grouping, Cooperative Learning and the Gifted , 1990 .

[22]  Rosemary L. Newkirk.  A Comparison of Learner Control and Machine Control Strategies for Computer‐Assisted Instruction , 1973 .

[23]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Some Conditions of Meaningful Learning for Computer Programming: Advance Organizers and Subject Control of Frame Order. , 1976 .

[24]  James D. Klein,et al.  The effects of cued interaction and ability grouping during cooperative computer-based science instruction , 1995 .

[25]  S. Sharan.  Cooperative Learning in Small Groups: Recent Methods and Effects on Achievement, Attitudes, and Ethnic Relations , 1980 .

[26]  Angela B. Garcia,et al.  Effects of Student Control and Choice on Engagement in a CAI Arithmetic Task in a Low-Income School. , 1975 .

[27]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  A Test of One Learner-Control Strategy With Students of Differing Levels of Task Persistence , 1988 .

[28]  Lenora Cook.  Cooperative learning: A successful college teaching strategy , 1991 .

[29]  Robert J. Casey,et al.  Individualistic versus Paired/Cooperative Computer-Assisted Instruction: Matching Instructional Method with Cognitive Style , 1991 .

[30]  Z. Mevarech,et al.  To Cooperate or Not to Cooperate in CAI: That Is the Question , 1987 .

[31]  Cecilia L. Lopez,et al.  The relationship between learner control of CAI and locus of control among hispanic students , 1989 .

[32]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  The selection of instructional options in a computer-based coordinate concept lesson , 1985 .

[33]  A. King.  Enhancing Peer Interaction and Learning in the Classroom Through Reciprocal Questioning , 1990 .

[34]  W. Milheim,et al.  Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. , 1991 .

[35]  Thomas C. Reeves.  Pseudoscience in Instructional Technology: The Case of Learner Control Research. , 1993 .

[36]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Comparison Of Computer-Assisted Cooperative, Competitive, And Individualistic Learning , 1986 .

[37]  Paul M. Balson,et al.  Instructor-Controlled versus Student-Controlled Training in a Videodisc-Based Paramedical Program , 1984 .

[38]  J. Fry.  Interactive Relationship between Inquisitiveness and Student Control of Instruction. , 1972 .

[39]  H. Sullivan,et al.  Practice Mode and Learner Control in Computer-Based Instruction , 1990 .

[40]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[41]  Gregory C. Sales,et al.  Pair versus individual work on the acquisition of concepts in a computer-based in structional lesson , 1987 .

[42]  Gayle V. Davidson,et al.  The Effects of Group Computer-Based Instruction and Learning Style on Achievement and Attitude. , 1993 .

[43]  J. Stevens.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[44]  Michael D. Williams,et al.  The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on high- and average-ability students , 1993 .

[45]  Steven M. Crooks,et al.  Effects of Cooperative Learning and Learner-Control Modes in Computer-Based Instruction. , 1996 .

[46]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Cooperative Learning and the Structure of Interracial Friendships , 1981 .

[47]  Howard J. Sullivan,et al.  Effects of Self-Pacing and Instructor-Pacing in a PSI Course. , 1977 .

[48]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[49]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. , 1985 .

[50]  Joseph R. Makuch,et al.  Effects of Individual versus Paired/Cooperative Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Effectiveness and Efficiency of an In-Service Training Lesson , 1992 .

[51]  James D. Klein,et al.  Implementing individual and small group learning structures with a computer simulation , 1999 .

[52]  J. C. Riddell,et al.  Systematic Manipulation of Student Pacing, the Perfection Requirement, and Contact with a Teaching Assistant in an Introductory Psychology Course , 1975 .

[53]  James D. Klein,et al.  Influence of Student Ability, Locus of Control, and Type of Instructional Control on Performance and Confidence. , 1990 .

[54]  A. King,et al.  Effects of Guided Cooperative Questioning on Children's Knowledge Construction. , 1993 .

[55]  Susan H. Gray,et al.  The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning , 1987 .

[56]  G. Glass,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology , 1970 .

[57]  James D. Klein,et al.  Effects of orienting activities and practice on achievement, continuing motivation, and student behaviors in a cooperative learning environment , 1994 .