THE DETERRENT EFFECT OF PERCEIVED CERTAINTY AND SEVERITY OF PUNISHMENT REVISITED

This paper synthesizes and extends recent criticisms of cross-sectional and panel studies of perceptual deterrence and then uses those criticisms to design a better cross-sectional study. A series of scenarios involving the noncompliance of a hypothetical plumber were posed to a sample of predominantly middle-aged administrators. The respondents were asked to estimate the probability that the noncompliance would be detected and, if detected, the probability that it would result in criminal prosecution. Respondents were also asked to project their own behavior if in the plumber's position. The results contrast sharply with prior findings, especially of the panel studies. Not only do perceptions of detection risk play an important role in deterring tax noncompliance, but fear of criminal prosecution appears to be a powerful deterrent.

[1]  Patricia G. Erickson,et al.  Cross-sectional versus longitudinal research: An empirical comparison of projected and subsequent criminality , 1987 .

[2]  Guillermina Jasso,et al.  Measuring household social standing , 1974 .

[3]  R. Paternoster,et al.  The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues , 1987 .

[4]  R. Paternoster,et al.  The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Severity: A Reexamination , 1986 .

[5]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter? , 1983 .

[6]  M. Silberman.  Toward a theory of criminal deterrence. , 1976 .

[7]  Jack P. Gibbs,et al.  Perceived Risk of Punishment and Self-Reported Delinquency , 1978 .

[8]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Crime Rates and Legal Sanctions , 1969 .

[9]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Perceived Penal Sanction and Self-Reported Criminality: A Neglected Approach to Deterrence Research. , 1972 .

[10]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Severity of Punishment , 1980 .

[11]  Andy B. Anderson,et al.  Models of deterrence theory , 1983 .

[12]  Craig V. D. Thornton,et al.  Crime, Deterrence, and Rational Choice , 1986 .

[13]  John S. Carroll,et al.  A Psychological Approach to Deterrence: The Evaluation of Crime Opportunities , 1978 .

[14]  L. Calvin,et al.  A Study of Admitted Income Tax Evasion , 1978 .

[15]  J. Toby.  Social Disorganization and Stake in Conformity: Complementary Factors in the Predatory Behavior of Hoodlums , 1957 .

[16]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Perceived Risk and Deterrence: Methodological Artifacts in Perceptual Deterrence Research , 1982 .

[17]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Deterrent and Experiential Effects: the Problem of Causal Order in Perceptual Deterrence Research , 1982 .

[18]  Wilbur J. Scott,et al.  Tax evasion and mechanisms of social control: A comparison with grand and petty theft , 1982 .

[19]  Tinsley E. Yarbrough,et al.  Tax Ethics and Taxpayer Attitudes: A Survey , 1978 .

[20]  D. Bishop,et al.  Legal and Extralegal Barriers to Delinquency , 1984 .

[21]  K. Williams,et al.  Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. , 1986 .

[22]  Quint C. Thurman,et al.  Neutralization and Tax Evasion: How Effective Would a Moral Appeal Be in Improving Compliance to Tax Laws? , 1984 .

[23]  Richard J. Lundman.  One-Wave Perceptual Deterrence Research: Some Grounds for the Renewed Examination of Cross-Sectional Methods , 1986 .

[24]  S. Rettig,et al.  The risk hypothesis in predictive judgments of unethical behavior. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[25]  D. Nagin,et al.  Tax Compliance and Perceptions of the Risks of Detection and Criminal Prosecution , 1989 .